Synod Social Media Promotes Women Priests

Last week, we saw widespread chuckles at the immeasurably cringe hand holding exercise of the Synod elitist circle.

Now, those in charge of the Synod's media have produced yet another PR disaster, with hand holding of another variety.

This image was posted on the official Synod media account. It features a man (?) wearing a Pride shirt alongside a female priest.

Some of the other images posted were deeply unsettling, including one that placed ‘Priest Biases’ and ‘Heirarchy’ alongside ‘Racism’ and ‘Abuse’.

There were other pieces of ‘art’ including this hilarious one showing a ‘Queer’, a ‘Muslim’ and what appears to be the Cookie Monster from Sesame Street.

As the Synod unfolds, it is becoming more and more plausible to say that there are those in Rome who have no interest in what people have to say and are simply implementing a pre determined outcome.

If they truly wanted to represent people, why not show images of the Latin Mass, which was desired by those responding to the Irish Synod? Why not show the division sown by those persecuting the Latin Mass as mentioned in the USA's Synodal Synthesis?

CNA quotes a spokesperson for the Synod of the Bishops who said:

"This was an example of the contributions we received. Not only [the] texts but also some of the designs. It was an example of what the listening consultation over the world has produced."

These crudely drawn pieces of artwork were chosen while others were not.

The Synod, if we are to judge it by its social media output, is rapidly descending into the mouthpiece of the English speaking liberal Catholic world, with no one or anything else in the wide global variety of our faith considered as worthy of a voice as the sycophants who see this Synod as a vehicle for their niche ecclesiastical engineering.

The promotion of women priests undermines not just Pope John Paul II, but Pope Francis also who has spoken against the innovation. Likewise Pope Francis has spoken against gay lobbies in the church, comparing it to Freemasonry, when he said:

"The problem is not having this orientation. We must be brothers. The problem is lobbying by this orientation, or lobbies of greedy people, political lobbies, Masonic lobbies, so many lobbies. This is the worse problem”.

But of course, the liberals in the church get to make up their own rules.