Pope Benedict XVI on the Peace of Christmas

The following is Pope Benedict XVI’s homily on the solemnity of the Nativity of Our Lord, Christmas Eve 2005.

"The Lord said to me: You are my son; this day I have begotten you". With these words of the second Psalm, the Church begins the Vigil Mass of Christmas, at which we celebrate the Birth of Jesus Christ our Redeemer in a stable in Bethlehem. This Psalm was once a part of the coronation rite of the kings of Judah. The People of Israel, in virtue of its election, considered itself in a special way a son of God, adopted by God. Just as the king was the personification of the people, his enthronement was experienced as a solemn act of adoption by God, whereby the King was in some way taken up into the very mystery of God. At Bethlehem night, these words, which were really more an expression of hope than a present reality, took on new and unexpected meaning. The Child lying in the manger is truly God’s Son. God is not eternal solitude but rather a circle of love and mutual self-giving. He is Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

But there is more: in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, God himself, God from God, became man. To him the Father says: "You are my son". God’s everlasting "today" has come down into the fleeting today of the world and lifted our momentary today into God’s eternal today. God is so great that he can become small. God is so powerful that he can make himself vulnerable and come to us as a defenceless child, so that we can love him. God is so good that he can give up his divine splendour and come down to a stable, so that we might find him, so that his goodness might touch us, give itself to us and continue to work through us. This is Christmas: "You are my son, this day I have begotten you". God has become one of us, so that we can be with him and become like him. As a sign, he chose the Child lying in the manger: this is how God is. This is how we come to know him. And on every child shines something of the splendour of that "today", of that closeness of God which we ought to love and to which we must yield – it shines on every child, even on those still unborn.

Let us listen to a second phrase from the liturgy of this holy Night, one taken from the Book of the Prophet Isaiah: "Upon the people who walked in darkness a great light has shone" (Is 9:1). The word "light" pervades the entire liturgy of tonight’s Mass. It is found again in the passage drawn from Saint Paul’s letter to Titus: "The grace of God has appeared" (2:11). The expression "has appeared", in the original Greek says the same thing that was expressed in Hebrew by the words "a light has shone": this "apparition" – this "epiphany" – is the breaking of God’s light upon a world full of darkness and unsolved problems. The Gospel then relates that the glory of the Lord appeared to the shepherds and "shone around them" (Lk 2:9). Wherever God’s glory appears, light spreads throughout the world. Saint John tells us that "God is light and in him is no darkness" (1 Jn 1:5). The light is a source of life.

But first, light means knowledge; it means truth, as contrasted with the darkness of falsehood and ignorance. Light gives us life, it shows us the way. But light, as a source of heat, also means love. Where there is love, light shines forth in the world; where there is hatred, the world remains in darkness. In the stable of Bethlehem there appeared the great light which the world awaits. In that Child lying in the stable, God has shown his glory – the glory of love, which gives itself away, stripping itself of all grandeur in order to guide us along the way of love. The light of Bethlehem has never been extinguished. In every age it has touched men and women, "it has shone around them". Wherever people put their faith in that Child, charity also sprang up – charity towards others, loving concern for the weak and the suffering, the grace of forgiveness. From Bethlehem a stream of light, love and truth spreads through the centuries. If we look to the Saints – from Paul and Augustine to Francis and Dominic, from Francis Xavier and Teresa of Avila to Mother Teresa of Calcutta – we see this flood of goodness, this path of light kindled ever anew by the mystery of Bethlehem, by that God who became a Child. In that Child, God countered the violence of this world with his own goodness. He calls us to follow that Child.

Along with the Christmas tree, our Austrian friends have also brought us a small flame lit in Bethlehem, as if to say that the true mystery of Christmas is the inner brightness radiating from this Child. May that inner brightness spread to us, and kindle in our hearts the flame of God’s goodness; may all of us, by our love, bring light to the world! Let us keep this light-giving flame, lit in faith, from being extinguished by the cold winds of our time! Let us guard it faithfully and give it to others! On this night, when we look towards Bethlehem, let us pray in a special way for the birthplace of our Redeemer and for the men and women who live and suffer there. We wish to pray for peace in the Holy Land: Look, O Lord, upon this corner of the earth, your Homeland, which is so very dear to you! Let your light shine upon it! Let it know peace!

The word "peace" brings us to a third key to the liturgy of this holy Night. The Child foretold by Isaiah is called "Prince of Peace". His kingdom is said to be one "of endless peace". The shepherds in the Gospel hear the glad tidings: "Glory to God in the highest" and "on earth, peace...". At one time we used to say: "to men of good will". Nowadays we say "to those whom God loves". What does this change mean? Is good will no longer important? We would do better to ask: who are those whom God loves, and why does he love them? Does God have favourites? Does he love only certain people, while abandoning the others to themselves? The Gospel answers these questions by pointing to some particular people whom God loves. There are individuals, like Mary, Joseph, Elizabeth, Zechariah, Simeon and Anna. But there are also two groups of people: the shepherds and the Wise Men from the East, the "Magi". Tonight let us look at the shepherds. What kind of people were they? In the world of their time, shepherds were looked down upon; they were considered untrustworthy and not admitted as witnesses in court. But really, who were they? To be sure, they were not great saints, if by that word we mean people of heroic virtue. They were simple souls. The Gospel sheds light on one feature which later on, in the words of Jesus, would take on particular importance: they were people who were watchful. This was chiefly true in a superficial way: they kept watch over their flocks by night. But it was also true in a deeper way: they were ready to receive God’s Word through the Angel's proclamation. Their life was not closed in on itself; their hearts were open. In some way, deep down, they were waiting for something; they were waiting for God. Their watchfulness was a kind of readiness – a readiness to listen and to set out. They were waiting for a light which would show them the way. That is what is important for God. He loves everyone, because everyone is his creature. But some persons have closed their hearts; there is no door by which his love can enter. They think that they do not need God, nor do they want him. Other persons, who, from a moral standpoint, are perhaps no less wretched and sinful, at least experience a certain remorse. They are waiting for God. They realize that they need his goodness, even if they have no clear idea of what this means. Into their expectant hearts God’s light can enter, and with it, his peace. God seeks persons who can be vessels and heralds of his peace. Let us pray that he will not find our hearts closed. Let us strive to be active heralds of his peace – in the world of today.

Among Christians, the word "peace" has taken on a very particular meaning: it has become a word to designate communion in the Eucharist. There Christ’s peace is present. In all the places where the Eucharist is celebrated, a great network of peace spreads through the world. The communities gathered around the Eucharist make up a kingdom of peace as wide as the world itself. When we celebrate the Eucharist we find ourselves in Bethlehem, in the "house of bread". Christ gives himself to us and, in doing so, gives us his peace. He gives it to us so that we can carry the light of peace within and give it to others. He gives it to us so that we can become peacemakers and builders of peace in the world. And so we pray: Lord, fulfil your promise! Where there is conflict, give birth to peace! Where there is hatred, make love spring up! Where darkness prevails, let light shine! Make us heralds of your peace! Amen.

Pope Pius XII on Christmas and Unity

The following was the Christmas message of Pope Pius XII in 1942. It dwells upon the need for societies that are peaceful from top to bottom in order to bring about a true representation of the incarnation.

As the Holy Christmas Season comes round each year, the message of Jesus, Who is light in the midst of darkness, echoes once more from the Crib of Bethlehem in the ears of Christians and re-echoes in their hearts with an ever new freshness of joy and piety. It is a message which lights up with heavenly truth a world that is plunged in darkness by fatal errors. It infuses exuberant and trustful joy into mankind, torn by the anxiety of deep, bitter sorrow. It proclaims liberty to the sons of Adam, shackled with the chains of sin and guilt. It promises mercy, love, peace to the countless hosts of those in suffering and tribulation who see their happiness Shattered and their efforts broken in the tempestuous strife and hate of our stormy days.

The church bells, which announce this message in every continent, not only recall the gift which God made to mankind at the dawn of the Christian Era; they also announce and proclaim a consoling reality of the present, a reality which is eternally young, living and lifegiving; it is the reality of the “True Light which enlighteneth every man that cometh into this World,” and which knows no setting. The Eternal Word, Who is the Way, the Truth and the Life, began His mission of saving and redeeming the human race by being born in the squalor of a stable and by thus ennobling and hallowing poverty.

He thus proclaimed and consecrated a message which is still, today, the Word of Eternal Life. That message can solve the most tortuous questions, unsolved and insoluble for those who bring to their investigations a mentality and an apparatus which are ephemeral and merely human; and those questions stand up, bleeding, imperiously demanding an answer, before the thought and the feeling of embittered and exasperated mankind.

The watchword “I have compassion on the multitude” is for Us a sacred trust which may not be abused; it remains strong, and impelling in all times and in all human situations, as it was the distinguishing mark of Jesus.

The Church would be untrue to herself, ceasing to be a mother, if she turned a deaf ear to her children’s anguished cries, which reach her from every class of the human family. She does not intend to take sides for any of the particular forms in which the several peoples and States strive to solve the gigantic problems of domestic order or international collaboration, as long as these forms conform to the law of God. But on the other hand, as the “Pillar and Ground of Truth” and guardian, by the will of God and the mandate of Christ, of the natural and supernatural order, the Church cannot renounce her right to proclaim to her sons and to the whole world the unchanging basic laws, saving them from every perversion, frustration, corruption, false interpretation and error.

This is all the more necessary for the fact that from the exact maintenance of these laws, and not merely by the effort of noble and courageous wills, depends in the last analysis the solidity of any national and international order, so fervently desired by all peoples. We know the qualities of courage and sacrifice of those peoples, and We also know their straitened conditions and their sorrow; and in this hour of unspeakable trial and strife We feel Ourselves bound to each and every one of them without exception, by a deep, all-embracing, unmovable affection, and by an immense desire to bring them every solace and help which is in any way at Our command.

Primary Elements of Social Life

In our last Christmas Message, We expounded the principles- which Christian thought suggests, for the establishment of an international order of friendly relations and collaboration such as to conform to the demands of God’s Law. Today We shall, with the consent, We feel, and the interested attention of all upright men, pause to consider very carefully and with equal impartiality, the fundamental laws of the internal order of the States and peoples.

International relations and internal order are intimately related. International equilibrium and harmony depend on the internal equilibrium and development of the individual States in the material, social and intellectual spheres. A firm steady peace policy towards other nations is, in fact, impossible without a spirit of peace within the nation which inspires trust. It is only, then, by striving for an integral peace, a peace in both fields, that people will be freed from the cruel nightmare of war, and the material and psychological causes of further discord and disorder will be diminished in a desire for peace, and hence aims at attaining peace, that “tranquil living together in order” in which St. Thomas finds the essence of peace. Two primary elements, then, regulate social life, a living together in order, and a living together in tranquillity.

Order

Order, which is fundamental in an association of men (of beings, that is, who strive to attain an end appropriate to their nature) is not merely external linking up of parts which are numerically distinct. It is rather, and must be, a tendency and an ever more perfect approach to an internal union; and this does not exclude differences founded in fact and sanctioned by the will of God or by supernatural standard.

A clear understanding of the genuine fundamentals of all social life has a capital importance today as never before, when mankind, impregnated by the poison of error and social aberrations, tormented by the fever of discordant desires, doctrines, and aims, is excitedly tossing about in the disorder which it has itself created, and is experiencing the destructive force of false ideas that disregard the Law of God or are opposed to it. And since disorder can only be overcome by an order which is not merely superimposed and fictitious (just as darkness with its fearful and depressing effects can only be driven away by light and not by will o’ the wisps); so security, reorganizations, progressive improvement cannot be expected and cannot be brought about unless by a return of large and influential sections to correct notions about security.

It is a return which calls for the Grace of God in large measure, and for a resolute will, ready and prepared for sacrifice on the part of good farseeing men. From these influential circles who are more capable of penetrating and appreciating the beauty of just social norms, there will pass on and infiltrate into the masses the clear knowledge of the true, divine, spiritual origin of social life. Thus the way will be cleared for the reawakening, the growth and fixing of those moral principles without which even the proudest achievements create but a babel in which the citizens, though they live inside the same walls, speak different and incoherent languages.

From individual and social life we should rise to God, the First Cause and Ultimate Foundation, as He is the Creator of the first conjugal society, from which we have the society which is the family, and the society of peoples and of nations. As an image, albeit imperfect, of its Exemplar, the One and Triune God, Who through the Mystery of the Incarnation, redeemed and raised human nature, life in society, in its ideals and in its end, possesses by the light of reason and of revelation a moral authority and an absoluteness which transcend every temporal change. It has a power of attraction that, far from being weakened or lessened by delusions, errors, failures, draws irresistibly the noblest and most faithful souls to the Lord, to take up with renewed energy, with added knowledge, with new studies, methods and means, the enterprises which in other times and circumstances were tried in vain.

The origin and the primary scope of social life is the conservation, development and perfection of the human person, helping him to realize accurately the demands and values of religion and culture set by the Creator for every man and for all mankind, both as a whole and in its natural ramifications.

A social teaching or a social reconstruction program which denies or prescinds from this internal essential relation to God of everything that regards men, is on a false course; and while it builds up with one hand, it prepares with the other the materials which sooner or later will undermine and destroy the whole fabric. And when it disregards the respect due to the human person and to the life which is proper to that person, and gives no thought to it in its organization, in legislative and executive activity, then instead of serving society, it harms it; instead of encouraging and stimulating social thought, instead of realizing its hopes and expectations, it strips it of all real value and reduces it to a utilitarian formula which is openly rejected by constantly increasing groups.

If social life implies intrinsic unity, it does not, at the same time, exclude differences which are founded in fact and nature. When we hold fast to God, the Supreme Controller of all that relates to man, then the similarities no less than the differences of men find their allotted place in the fixed order of being, of values, and hence also of morality. When, however, this foundation is removed, there is a dangerous lack of cohesion in the various spheres of culture; the frontier of true value becomes uncertain and shifting, even to the point where mere external factors, and often blind instincts, come to determine, according to the prevalent fashion of the day, who is to have control of this or that direction.

After the fateful economy of the past decades, during which the lives of all citizens were subordinated to the stimulus of gain, there now succeeds another and no less fateful policy which, while it considers everybody with reference to the State, excludes all thought of ethics or religion. This is a fatal travesty, a fatal error. It is calculated to bring about far-reaching consequences for social life, which is never nearer to losing its noblest prerogatives than when it thinks it can deny or forget with impunity the external source of its own dignity: God.

Reason, enlightened by faith, assigns to individuals and to particular societies in the social organization a definite and exalted place. It knows, to mention only the most important, that the whole political and economic activity of the State is directed to the permanent realization of the common good.

In a conception of society which is pervaded and sanctioned by religious thought, the influence of economics and of every other sphere of cultural activity represents a universal and most exalted center of activity, very rich in its variety and coherent in its harmony, in which men’s intellectual equality and diversity of occupation come into their own and secure adequate expression. When this is not so, work is depreciated and the worker is belittled.

That social life, such as God willed it, may attain its scope, it needs a juridical order to support it from without, to defend and protect it. The function of this juridical order is not to dominate but to serve, to help the development and increase of society’s vitality in the rich multiplicity of its ends, leading all the individual energies to their perfection in peaceful completion, and defending them with appropriate and honest means against all that may militate against those who only by this means can be held within the noble discipline of social life. But in the just fulfillment of this right, an authority which is truly worthy of the name will always be painfully conscious of its responsibility in the sight of the Eternal Judge, before Whose Tribunal every wrong judgment, and especially every revolt against the order established by God, will receive without fail its sanction and its condemnation.

The precise, bedrock, basic rules that govern society cannot be prejudiced by the intervention of human agency. They can be denied, overlooked, despised, transgressed, but they can never be overthrown with legal validity. It is true indeed that, as time goes on, conditions of life change. But there is never a complete break or a complete discontinuity between the law of yesterday and that of today, between the disappearance of old powers and constitutions and the appearance of a new order. In any case, whatever be the change or transformation, the scope of every social life remains identical, sacred, obligatory; it is the development of the personal values of man as the image of God; and the obligation remains with every member of the human family to realize his unchangeable destiny, whosoever be the legislator and the authority whom he obeys.

In consequence, there always remains, too, his inalienable right, which no opposition can nullify — a right which must be respected by friend and foe — to a legal order and practice which appreciate and understand that it is their essential duty to serve the common good.

The juridical order has, besides, the high and difficult scope of insuring harmonious relations both between individuals and between societies, and within these. This scope will be reached if legislators will abstain from following those perilous theories and practices, so harmful to communities to their spirit of union, which derive their origin and promulgation from false postulates. Among such postulates We must count the juridical positivism which attributes a deceptive majesty to the setting up of purely human laws, and which leaves the way open for a fatal divorce of law from morality.

There is, besides, the conception which claims for particular nations, or classes, the juridical instinct as the final imperative and the norm from which there is no appeal; finally, there are those various theories which, differing among themselves, and deriving from opposite ideologies, agree in considering the State, or a group which represents it, as an absolute and supreme entity, exempt from control and from criticism even when its theoretical and practical postulates result in and offend by, their open denial of essential tenets of the human Christian conscience.

Anyone who considers with an open and penetrating mind the vital connection between social order and a genuine juridical order, and who is conscious of the fact that internal order in all its complexity depends on the predominance of spiritual forces, on the respect of human dignity in oneself and in others, on the love of society and of its God-given ends, cannot wonder at the sad effects of juridical conceptions which, far from the royal road of truth, proceed on the insecure ground of materialistic postulates. But he will realize at once the urgent need of a return to a conception of law which is spiritual and ethical, serious and profound, vivified by the warmth of true humanity and illumined by the splendor of the Christian Faith, which bids us seek in the juridical order an outward refraction of the social order willed by God, a luminous product of the spirit of man which is in turn the image of the Spirit of God.

On this organic conception which alone is living, in which the noblest humanity and the most genuine Christian spirit flourish in harmony, there is marked the Scripture thought, expounded by the great Aquinas: [Opus Justitiae Pax] — The work of justice shall be peace — a thought which is applicable to the internal as to the external aspect of social life. It admits of neither contrast nor alternative such as expressed in the disjunction, love or right, but of the fruitful synthesis, love and right. In the one as in the other, since both radiate from the same Spirit of God, We read the program and the seal of the human spirit; they complement one another, give each other life and support, walk hand in hand along the road of concord and pacification, while right clears the way for love and love makes right less stern, and gives it a higher meaning. Both elevate human life to that social atmosphere where, even amid the failings, the obstacles and the difficulties of this earth a fraternal community of life is made possible.

But once let the baneful spirit of materialist ideas predominate; let the urge for power and for predominance take in its rough hands the direction of affairs; you shall then find its disruptive effects appearing daily in greater measure; you shall see love and justice disappear; all this as the sad foretaste of the catastrophes that menace society when it abandons God.

Tranquillity

The second fundamental element of peace, towards which every human society tends almost instinctively, is tranquillity.

O blessed tranquillity, thou has nothing in common with the spirit of holding fixedly and obstinately, unrelenting and with childish stubbornness, to things as they are; nor yet with the reluctance-child of cowardice and selfishness — to put one’s mind to the solution of problems and questions which the passage of time and the succession of generations, with their different needs and progress, make actual, and bring up a burning question of the day. But for a Christian who is conscious of his responsibilities even towards the least of his brethren, there is no such thing as slothful tranquillity; nor is there question of flight, but of struggle, of action against every inaction and desertion in the great spiritual combat where the stakes are the construction, nay the very soul, of the society of tomorrow.

In the mind of Aquinas, tranquillity and feverish activity are not opposed, but rather form a well-balanced pair for him who is inspired by the beauty and the urgency of the spiritual foundations of society, and of the nobility of its ideals. To you, young people, who are wont to turn your back on the past, and to rely on the future for your aspirations and your hopes, We address Ourselves with ardent love and fatherly anxiety; enthusiasm and courage do not of themselves suffice, if they be not, as they should be, placed in the service of good and of a spotless cause. It is vain to agitate, to weary yourselves, to bustle about without ever resting. You must be inspired with the conviction that you are fighting for truth, that you are sacrificing in the cause of truth your own tastes and energies wishes, and sacrifices; that you are fighting for the eternal laws of God, for the dignity of the human person, and for the attainment of its destiny.

When mature men and young men, while remaining always at anchor, in the sea of the eterna11y active tranquillity of God, coordinate their differences of temperament and activity in a genuine Christian spirit, then if the propelling element is joined to the refraining element, the natural differences between the generations will never become dangerous, and will even conduce vigorously to the enforcement of the eternal laws of God in the changing course of times and of conditions of life.

In one field of social life, where for a whole century there was agitation and bitter conflict, there is today a calm, at least on the surface. We speak of the vast and ever growing world of labor, of the immense army of workers, of breadwinners and dependents. If we consider the present with its wartime exigencies, as an admitted fact, then this calm may be called a necessary and reasonable demand; but if we look at the present situation in the light of justice, and with reference to a legitimately regulated labor movement, then the tranquillity will remain only apparent, until the scope of such a movement be attained.

Always moved by religious motives, the Church has condemned the various forms of Marxist Socialism; and she condemns them today, because it is her permanent right and duty to safeguard men from currents as thought and influences that jeopardize their external salvation. But the Church cannot ignore or overlook the fact that the worker in his efforts to better his lot, is opposed by a machinery which is not only not in accordance with nature, but is at variance with God’s plan and with the purpose He had in creating the goods of earth.

In spite of the fact that the ways they followed were and are false and to be condemned, what man, and especially what priest or Christian, could remain deaf to the cries that rise from the depths and call for justice and a spirit of brotherly collaboration in a world ruled by a just God? Such silence would be culpable and unjustifiable before God, and contrary to the inspired teaching of the Apostle, who, while he inculcates the need of resolution in the fight against error, also knows that we must be full of sympathy for those who err, and open-minded in our understanding of their aspirations, hopes and motives.

When He blessed our first parents, God said: “Increase and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it.” And to the first father of a family, He said later: “In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread.” The dignity of the human person, then, requires normally as a natural foundation of life the right to the use of the goods of the earth. To this right corresponds the fundamental obligation to grant private ownership of property, if possible, to all. Positive legislation regulating private ownership may change and more or less restrict its use. But if legislation is to play its part in the pacification of the community, it must prevent the worker, who is or will be a father of a family, from being condemned to an economic dependence and slavery which is irreconcilable with his rights as a person. Whether this slavery arises from the exploitation of private capital or from the power of the state, the result is the same. Indeed, under the pressure of a State which dominates all and controls the whole field of public and private life, even going into the realm of ideas and beliefs and of conscience, this lack of liberty can have the more serious consequences, as experience shows and proves.

Five Points for Ordering Society

Anyone who considers in the light of reason and of faith the foundations and the aims of social life, which we have traced in broad outline, and contemplates them in their purity and moral sublimity, and in their benefits in every sphere of life, cannot but be convinced of the powerful contribution to order and pacification which efforts directed towards great ideals and resolved to face difficulties, could present, or better, could restore to a world which is internally unhinged, when once they had thrown down the intellectual and juridical barriers, created by prejudice, errors, indifferences, and by a long tradition of secularization of thought, feeling, action which succeeded in detaching and subtracting the early city from the light and force of the City of God. Today, as never before, the hour has come for reparation, for rousing the conscience of the world from the heavy torpor into which the drugs of false ideas, widely diffused, have sunk it. This is all the more so because in this hour of material and moral disintegration the appreciation of the emptiness and inconsistency of every purely human order is beginning to disillusion even those who, in days of apparent happiness, were not conscious of the need of contact with the eternal in themselves or in society, and did not look upon its absence as an essential defect in their constitutions. What was clear to the Christian, who in his deeply founded faith was pained by the ignorance of others, is now presented to us in dazzling clearness by the din of appalling catastrophe which the present upheaval brings to man and which portrays all the terrifying lineaments of a general judgment even for the tepid, the indifferent, the frivolous. It is indeed, an old truth which comes out in ever new forms and thunders through the ages and through the nations from the mouth of the Prophet: “All that forsake thee shall be confounded; they who depart from thee, shall be written in the earth; because they have forsaken the Lord, the Vein of Living Waters.”

The call of the moment is not lamentation but action; not lamentation over what has been, but reconstruction of what is to arise and must arise for the good of society. It is for the best and most distinguished members of the Christian family, filled with the enthusiasm of Crusaders, to unite in the spirit of truth, justice and love to the call; God wills it, ready to serve, to sacrifice themselves, like the Crusaders of old.

If the issue was then the liberation of the land hallowed by the life of the Incarnate Word of God, the call today is, if We may so express Ourselves, to traverse the sea of errors of our day and to march on to free the holy land of the spirit, which is destined to sustain in its foundations the unchangeable norms and laws on which will rise a social construction of solid internal consistency. With this lofty purpose before Us, We turn from the crib of the Prince of Peace, confident that His grace is diffused in all hearts, to you, beloved children, who recognized and adore in Christ your Savior; We turn to all those who are united with Us at least by the bond of faith in God; We turn, finally to all those who would be free of doubt and error, and who desire light and guidance; and We exhort you with suppliant paternal insistence not only to realize fully the dreadful gravity of this hour, but also to meditate upon the vistas of good and supernatural benefit which it opens up, and to unite and collaborate towards the renewal of society in spirit and truth.

The essential aim of this necessary and holy crusade is that the Star of Peace, the Star of Bethlehem, may shine out again over the whole mankind in all its brilliant splendor and reassuring consolation as a pledge and augury of a future better, more fruitful and happier. It is true that the road from night to full day will be long; but of decisive importance are the first steps on the path, the first five mile-stones of which bear chiseled on them the following maxims:

1. Dignity of the Human Person. He who would have the Star of Peace shine out and stand over society should cooperate, for his part, in giving back to the human person the dignity given to it by God from the very beginning; should oppose the excessive herding of men, as if they were a mass without a soul; their economic, social, political, intellectual and moral inconsistency; their dearth of solid principles and strong convictions, their surfeit of instinctive sensible excitement and their fickleness.

He should favor, by every lawful means, in every sphere of life, social institutions in which a full personal responsibility is assured and guaranteed both in the early and the eternal order of things. He should uphold respect for and the practical realization of the following fundamental personal rights; the right to maintain and develop one’s corporal, intellectual and moral life and especially the right to religious formation and education; the right to worship God in private and public and to carry on religious works of charity; the right to marry and to achieve the aim of married life; the right to conjugal and domestic society; the right to work, as the indispensable means towards the maintenance of family life; the right to free choice of state of life, and hence, too, of the priesthood or religious life; the right to the use of material goods; in keeping with his duties and social limitations

2. Defense of Social Unity. He who would have the Star of Peace shine out and stand over society should reject every form of materialism which sees in the people only a herd of individuals who, divided and without any internal cohesion, are considered as a mass to be forded over and treated arbitrarily; he should strive to understand society as an intrinsic unity, which has grown up and matured under the guidance of Providence, a unity which within the bounds assigned to it and according to its own peculiar gifts — tends, with the collaboration of the various classes and professions, towards the eternal and ever new aims of culture and religion.

He should defend the indissolubility of matrimony; he should give to the family — that unique cell of the people — space, light and air so that it may attend to its mission of perpetuating new life, and of educating children in a spirit corresponding to its own true religious convictions, and that it may preserve, fortify and reconstitute, according to its powers, its proper economic, spiritual, moral and juridic unity. He should take care that the material and spiritual advantages of the family be shared by the domestic servants; he should strive to secure for every family a dwelling where a materially and morally healthy family life may be seen in all its vigor and worth; he should take care that the place of work be not so separated from the home as to make the head of the family and educator of the children a virtual stranger to his own household; he should take care above all that the bond of trust and mutual help should be reestablished between the family and the public school, that bond which in other times gave such happy results, but which now has been replaced by mistrust where the school, influenced and controlled by the spirit of materialism, corrupts and destroys what the parents have instilled into the minds of the children.

3. Dignity of Labor. He who would have the Star of Peace shine out and stand over society should give to work the place assigned to it by God from the beginning. As an indispensable means towards gaining over the world that mastery which God wishes, for His glory, all work has an inherent dignity and at the same time a close connection with the perfection of the person; this is the noble dignity and privilege of work which is not any way cheapened by the fatigue and the burden, which have to be borne as the effect of original sin, in obedience and submission to the will of God.

Those who are familiar with the great Encyclicals of Our predecessors and Our Own previous messages know well that the Church does not hesitate to draw the practical conclusions which are derived from the moral nobility of work, and to give them all the support of her authority. These exigencies include, besides a just wage which covers the needs of the worker and his family, the conservation and perfection of a social order which will make possible an assured, even if modest, private property for all classes of society, which will promote higher education for the children of the working class who are especially endowed with intelligence and good will, will promote the care and the practice of the social spirit in one’s immediate neighborhood, in the district, the province, the people and the nation, a spirit which, by smoothing over friction arising from privileges or class interests, removes from the workers the sense of isolation through the assuring experience of a genuinely human, and fraternally Christian, solidarity.

The progress and the extent of urgent social reforms depend on the economic possibilities of single Nations. It is only through an intelligent and generous sharing of forces between the strong and the weak that it will be possible to effect a universal pacification in such wise as not to leave behind centers of conflagration and infection from which new disasters may come. There are evident signs which go to show that, in the ferment of all the prejudices and feelings of hate, those inevitable but lamentable offspring of the war psychosis, there is still aflame in the people the consciousness of their intimate mutual dependence for good or for evil, nay, that this consciousness is more alive and active. It is not true that deep thinkers see ever more clearly in the renunciation of egoism and national isolation, the way to general salvation, ready as they are to demand of their peoples, a heavy participation in the sacrifices necessary for social well-being in other peoples?

May this Christmas Message of Ours, addressed to all those who are animated by a good and generous heart, encourage and increase the legions of these social crusades in every nation. And may God deign to give to their peaceful cause the victory of which their noble enterprise is worthy.

4. The Rehabilitation of Juridical Order. He who would have the Star of Peace shine out and stand over social life should collaborate towards a complete rehabilitation of the juridical order. The juridic sense of today is often altered and overturned by the profession and the practice of positivism and a utilitarianism which are subjected and bound to the service of determined groups, classes and movements, whose programs direct and determine the course of legislation and the practices of the courts. The cure of this situation becomes feasible when we awaken again the consciousness of a juridical order resting on the supreme dominion of God, and safeguarded from all human whims; a consciousness of an order which stretches forth its arm, in protection or punishment, over the unforgettable rights of man and protects them against the attacks of every human power.

From the juridic order, as willed by God, flows man’s inalienable right to juridical security, and by this very fact to a definite sphere of rights, immune from all arbitrary attack. The relations of man to man, of the individual to society, to authority, to civil duties; the relations of society and of authority to the individual, should be placed on a firm juridic footing and be guarded, when the need arises, by the authority of the courts. This supposes:

a) A tribunal and a judge who take their directions from a clearly formulated and defined right.

b) Clear juridical norms which may not be overturned by unwarranted appeals to a supposed popular sentiment or by merely utilitarian considerations.

c) The recognition of the principle that even the State and the functionaries and organizations depend on it are obliged to repair and to withdraw measures which are harmful to the liberty, property, honor, progress of health of the individuals.

5. Christian Conception of the State. He who would have the Star of Peace shine out and stand over human society should cooperate towards the setting up of a State conception and practice founded on reasonable discipline, exalted kindliness and responsible Christian spirit. He should help to restore the State and its power to the service of human society, to the full recognition of the respect due to the human person and his efforts to attain his eternal destiny. He should apply and devote himself to dispelling the errors which aim at causing the State and its authority to deviate from the path of morality, at severing them from the eminently ethical bond which links them to individual and social life, and at making them deny or in practice ignore their essential dependence on the will of the Creator. He should work for the recognition and diffusion of the truth which teaches, even in matters of this world, that the deepest meaning, the ultimate moral basis and the universal validity of “reigning” lies in “serving.”

Postwar Renovation of Society

Beloved Children, may God grant that while you listen to Our voice your heart may be profoundly stirred and moved by the deeply felt seriousness, the loving solicitude, the unremitting insistence, with which We drive home these thoughts, which are meant as an appeal to the conscience of the world, and a rallying-cry to all those who are ready to ponder and weigh the grandeur of their mission and responsibility by the vastness of this universal disaster.

A great part of mankind, and, let Us not shirk from saying it, not a few who call themselves Christians, have to some extent their share in the collective responsibility for the growth of error and for the harm and the lack of moral fiber in the society of today.

What is this world war, with all its attendant circumstances, whether they be remote or proximate causes, its progress and material, legal and moral effects? What is it but the crumbling process, not expected, perhaps, by the thoughtless but seen and depreciated by those whose gaze penetrated into the realities of a social order which hid its mortal weakness and its unbridled lust for gain and power? That which in peace-time lay coiled up, broke loose at the outbreak of war in a sad succession of acts at variance with the human and Christian sense. International agreements to make war less inhuman by confining it to the combatants to regulate the procedure of occupation and imprisonment of the conquered remained in various places a dead letter. And who can see the end of this progressive demoralization of the people, who can wish to watch helplessly this disastrous progress? Should they not rather, over the ruins of a social order which has given such tragic proof of its ineptitude as a factor for the good of the people, gather together the hearts of all those who are magnanimous and upright, in the solemn vow not to rest until in all peoples and all nations of the earth a vast legion shall be formed of those handfuls of men who, bent on bringing back society to its center of gravity, which is the law of God, aspire to the service of the human person and of his common life ennobled in God.

Mankind owes that vow to the countless dead who lie buried on the field of battle: The sacrifice of their lives in the fulfillment of their duty is a holocaust offered for a new and better social order. Mankind owes that vow to the innumerable sorrowing host of mothers, widows and orphans who have seen the light, the solace and the support of their lives wrenched from them. Mankind owes that vow to those numberless exiles whom the hurricane of war has torn from their native land and scattered in the land of the stranger; who can make their own the lament of the Prophet: “Our inheritance is turned to aliens; our house to strangers.” Mankind owes that vow to the hundreds of thousands of persons who, without any fault on their part, sometimes only because of their nationality or race, have been consigned to death or to a slow decline. Mankind owes that vow to the many thousands of non- combatants, women, children, sick and aged, from whom aerial war-fare — whose horrors we have from the beginning frequently denounced — has without discrimination or through inadequate precautions, taken life, goods, health, home, charitable refuge, or house of prayer. Mankind owes that vow to the flood of tears and bitterness, to the accumulation of sorrow and suffering, emanating from the murderous ruin of the dreadful conflict and crying to Heaven to send down the Holy Spirit to liberate the world from the inundation of violence and terror.

And where could you with greater assurance and trust and with more efficacious faith place this vow for the renewal of society than at the foot of the “Desired of all Nations” Who lies before us in the crib with all the charm of His sweet humanity as a Babe, but also in the dynamic attraction of His incipient mission as Redeemer? Where could this noble and holy crusade for the cleaning and renewal of society have a more significant consecration or find a more potent inspiration than at Bethlehem, where the new Adam appears in the adorable mystery of the Incarnation? For it is at His fountains of truth and grace that mankind should find the water of life if it is not to perish in the desert of this life; “Of His fullness we all have received.” His fullness of grace and truth cows as freely today as it has for twenty centuries on the world.

His light can overcome the darkness, the rays of His love can conquer the icy egoism which holds so many back from becoming great and conspicuous in their higher life. To you, crusader-volunteers of a distinguished new society, live up to the new call for moral and Christian rebirth, declare war on the darkness which comes from deserting God, of the coolness that comes from strife between brothers. It is a fight for the human race, which is gravely ill and must be healed in the name of conscience ennobled by Christianity.

May Our blessing and Our paternal good wishes and encouragement go with your generous enterprise, and may they remain with all those who do not shirk hard sacrifices — those weapons which are more potent than any steel to combat the evil from which society suffers. Over your crusade for a social, human and Christian ideal may there shine out as a consolation and an inspiration the star that stands over the Grotto of Bethlehem, the first and the perennial star of the Christian Era. From the sign of it every faithful heart drew, draws and ever will draw strength; “If armies in camp should stand against me, my heart shall not fear.” Where that star shines, there is Christ. “With Him for leader we shall not wander; through Him let us go to Him, that with the Child that is born today we may rejoice.

USA Allows Satanists to Install Mock Nativity Display

The United States of America has allowed sick Satanists to install a shrine to demons in mockery of Our Lord Jesus Christ at the Illinois State Capitol.

Citing so called ‘religious freedom’, cowardly politicians have refused to stop the sick display from being established.

The organisers of the demonic installation, the Satanic Temple, taunted local Bishop Thomas Paprocki by inviting him to witness the event.

The bishop stated that the Satanic filth:

should have no place in this Capitol or any other place

A spokesperson for the Diocese told the media:

Mocking the millions of Christians in the state of Illinois and billions around the world by depicting the baby Jesus this Christmas with the ‘satanic deity’ Baphomet is the very definition of evil and causing division, but that is to be expected from an organization that is in existence to troll people of faith

“Bishop Paprocki declines the invitation to associate with evil and urges all people of true religious faith to shun the devil

There is no other country in the world where this sort of behaviour would be tolerated by Christians. The United States of America is the only nation where open devil worship is permitted in such an important building at Christmas time. There is not a Muslim, Communist or atheistic country that excuses this behaviour, so why does the United States allow for it? Why has the nominally Catholic President of the Untied States said nothing?

Orange Order Flex Strength With Trinity College Branch

Buoyed by recent support from Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald and Fine Gael politician Neale Richmond, anti Catholic group the Orange Order have reopened a ‘dormant’ branch in the historic symbol of Anglo Protestant power in Dublin, Trinity College.

The group, who have complained about being compared to the Ku Klux Klan and other arch Protestant groups, have become more openly visible in the South of Ireland over the past number of years. Then Taoiseach Leo Varadkar, who was educated in a Protestant school and who celebrated abortion in a former seat of Protestant power at Dublin Castle in 2018, visited an Orange Lodge in an official capacity last year and was gifted with a glass obelisk as a thank you. Varadkar, who was Tanaiste when the Irish government surrounded Fr. PJ Hughes and his church earlier this year because he was saying Mass, has also said that he would love to an Orange Order march through Dublin.

His party compatriot Neale Richmond also refused to apologise after being photographed near a banner honouring Oliver Cromwell, who raped, murdered and enslaved tens of thousands of Irish Catholics as part of his ethnic cleansing campaign during the anti Catholic and anti Gaelic genocide of 1649.

Richmond’s refusal to apologise was trumped by ‘Republican’ Mary Lou McDonald, who has gone on record as stating that she wants to force the entire island of Ireland to celebrate the Orange Order’s hatred for Catholicism every 12th of July.

Now, as part of the their increasing arrogance, the Order have openly expressed their reopening of their lodge at Trinity College, which had not been used publicly since 1966. After holding a formal ceremony this past week, they stated that they hope for more lodges to be established around the country.

It is not hard to imagine that they will have a lot of interest, particularly from members of Fine Gael and Sinn Fein, who have showed immense interest in the legacy of the Orange Order recently. In the past decade, this has included shutting the Vatican Embassy as Fine Gael did or picketing Catholic churches as Sinn Fein have done.

In a 2000 article for The Guardian, Henry McDonald summed up the hatred that envelopes the dark heart of the Orange Order:

None the less, anti-Catholicism lies at the root of Orange thought and not unionism; it remains a potent force. Worst of all, its final logical terminus is eliminationist, just as anti-Semitism was in Germany.

After all, if you believe that Catholic men, women and children will burn in the fires of Hell if they do not convert to the true faith, what's wrong with petrol-bombing their homes and burning them out of your streets?

Medical Experts SLAM Assisted Suicide Plans

As the far left gains momentum in trying to provide a legal framework for disposing of those perceived as unwanted and burdensome, the College of Psychiatrists has strongly objected to the plans in a powerful new statement.

Read their press release here:

The College of Psychiatrists of Ireland (College of Psychiatrists) has warned that physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia (PAS-E) is not compatible with good medical care and that its introduction in Ireland could place vulnerable patients at risk.

PAS-E is also known as “assisted dying” and in the New Year the issue will be the focus of a Special Oireachtas Committee set up to examine the Dying with Dignity Bill (2020).

The College of Psychiatrists is the professional and training body for psychiatrists in Ireland and represents 1,000 professional psychiatrists (both specialists and trainees) across the country.  It has today published a position paper on this issue [see editors’ note below] which sets out some key issues regarding the introduction of assisted dying in Ireland.  These include:

  • Assisted dying is contrary to the efforts of psychiatrists, other mental health staff and the public to prevent deaths by suicide.

  • It is likely to place vulnerable people at risk – many requests for assisted dying stem from issues such as fear of being a burden or fear of death rather than from intractable pain. Improvements in existing services should be deployed to manage these issues.

  • While often introduced for patients with terminal illness, once introduced assisted dying is likely to be applied more broadly to other groups, such that the numbers undertaking the procedure grow considerably above expectations;

  • The introduction of assisted dying represents a radical change in Irish law and a long-standing tradition of medical practice, as exemplified in the prohibition of deliberate killing in the Irish Medical Council ethics guidelines;

 

Consultant Liaison Psychiatrist Dr Eric Kelleher is a member of the College of Psychiatrists and contributing author to the position paper on assisted dying.

Speaking today, he said: “We are acutely aware of the sensitivity of this subject, and understand and support the fact that dying with dignity is the goal of all end-of-life care. Strengthening our palliative care and social support networks makes this possible. Not only is assisted dying or euthanasia not necessary for a dignified death, but techniques used to bring about death can themselves result in considerable and protracted suffering”.

“Where assisted dying is available, many requests stem, not from intractable pain, but from such causes as fear, depression, loneliness, and the wish not to burden carers. With adequate resources, including psychiatric care, psychological care, palliative medicine, pain services, and social supports, good end-of-life care is possible,” he said.

Dr Siobhan MacHale, Consultant Liaison Psychiatrist, a member of the College of Psychiatrists and contributing author to the position paper on assisted dying, said: “Once permitted in a jurisdiction, experience has shown that more and more people die from assisted dying. This is usually the result of progressively broadening criteria through legal challenges because, if a right to assisted dying is conceded, there is no logical reason to restrict this to those with a terminal illness.”

She continued: “Both sides of this debate support the goal of dying with dignity, but neither the proposed legislation nor the status quo (as evidenced by both clinical experience and the power of this debate) is sufficient. It is imperative for the Irish people to continue to demonstrate leadership as a liberal and compassionate society in working together to achieve this.”

READ THE FULL STATEMENT HERE:

Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia – The College of Psychiatrists of Ireland (irishpsychiatry.ie)

Dublin Honours Christ on Streets at Christmas

Irish Society for Christian Civilisation – ISFCC, an organization of lay Catholics, held three Christmas rallies on O’Connell St., Dublin on the 4th, 11th and 18th of December. Approximately seventy people attended each rally. The participants prayed the Joyful Mysteries of the Rosary and sang traditional Christmas carols such as Silent Night and Angels We Have Heard on High.

When asked why ISFCC organized these rallies, Damien Murphy, the rally leader, said, “We’re here today for two reasons. First, to bring the true joy and peace of Christmas - which is Our Lord Jesus Christ - to people who walk by us and, also, to oppose the secularization of Christmas in Ireland”

The scene moved many people, who often stopped and participated in the carols. The Child Jesus on a cushion in the centre of the rally also touched many others.

“The world is facing multiple crises.” said Damien. “People need to realise that Our Lady has already given us the solution to these problems when she appeared in Fatima and asked us to pray the Rosary every day.”

“The Rosary strengthens us. Through the Rosary, God gives us the wisdom and prudence to solve our problems because at the heart of every crisis in the world today lies a moral problem. A corrupt society will never be able to succeed but slowly sink into chaos.”

While the idea of Christmas rallies is new, ISFCC has held similar rallies in Dublin at the same location for almost ten years.

“We also have monthly Rosary Rallies here at the same place (O’Connell Street) once a month from May to October and get similar numbers, though our last one in October had around 200 people.” continued Damien.

Irish Society for Christian Civilisation and its campaign Ireland Needs Fatima is part of the worldwide movement called Tradition, Family, and Property founded in Brazil by the late Prof. Plinio Correa de Oliveira.



Latin Attacked Again

Just in time for Christmas, you can read the Vatican’s latest attack on the church’s universal tongue here as the language is limited in Baptisms, Weddings and Confirmations amongst others.

Given that liberals in the Vatican are now pushing for the recognition of Anglican ‘ordinations’ and that English will now be mandatory in most Irish churches, one can only wonder if the Irish martyrs could see this now, how would they feel?

You can read the ridiculous and spiteful document below.

******

Your Eminence / Most Reverend Excellency,

 after the publication by Pope Francis of the Apostolic Letter in the form of a "Motu Proprio" Traditionis custodes on the use of liturgical books prior to the reform of the Second Vatican Council, they reached the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments - which, exercises the authority of the Holy See for matters within its competence (cf. Traditionis custodes , n. 7) - various requests for clarification on its correct application. Some questions have been raised by several parties and with greater frequency: therefore, after having carefully evaluated them, after having informed the Holy Father and having received his consent, the answers to the most recurring questions are now published.

The text of the Motu Proprio and the Letter to all the Bishops that accompanies it clearly express the reasons for what Pope Francis has ordered. The first aim is to continue "in the constant search for ecclesial communion" ( Traditionis custodes , Premessa) which is expressed by recognizing in the liturgical books promulgated by the Holy Pontiffs Paul VI and John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of the Second Vatican Council, the only expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite (cf. Traditionis custodes, no. 1). This is the direction in which we want to walk and this is the meaning of the answers that we publish here: every prescribed norm always has the sole purpose of safeguarding the gift of ecclesial communion by walking together, with conviction of mind and heart, in the line indicated by the Holy Father.

It is sad to see how the deepest bond of unity - participation in the one broken Bread which is His Body offered so that all may be one (cf. Jn 17:21) - becomes a reason for division: it is the task of the Bishops, cum Petro et sub Petro , to safeguard communion, a necessary condition - the Apostle Paul reminds us of this (cf. 1 Cor 11: 17-34) - in order to participate in the Eucharistic table.

One fact is undeniable: the Council Fathers felt the urgency of a reform so that the truth of the faith celebrated would appear more and more in all its beauty and the people of God would grow in a full, active, conscious participation in the liturgical celebration (cf. Sacrosanctum Concilium n.14 ), present moment in the history of salvation, memorial of the Lord's Passover, our only hope.

As Pastors we must not lend ourselves to sterile polemics, capable only of creating division, in which the ritual fact is often exploited by ideological visions. Rather, we are all called to rediscover the value of the liturgical reform by safeguarding the truth and beauty of the Rite it has given us. For this to happen, we are aware that a renewed and continuous liturgical formation is necessary both for priests and for the lay faithful.

In the solemn closing of the second session of the Council (December 4, 1963) St. Paul VI expressed himself as follows (n.11):

"After all, this passionate and complex discussion was by no means without abundant fruit: in fact that theme which was first of all addressed, and which in a certain sense is pre-eminent in the Church, both by its nature and by its dignity - we mean the sacred Liturgy - has reached a happy conclusion, and today comes to us with a solemn rite promulgated. For this reason Our soul rejoices with sincere joy. In this fact we recognize that the just order of values ​​and duties has been respected: in this way we have recognized that the place of honor must be reserved for God; that we as a first duty are obliged to raise prayers to God; that the sacred Liturgy is the primary source of that divine exchange in which the life of God is communicated to us, it is the first school of our soul, it is the first gift that must be given by us to the Christian people, united with us in faith and assiduity to prayer; finally, the first invitation to humanity to loosen its mute tongue in holy and sincere prayers and to feel that ineffable regenerating force of the soul that is inherent in singing with us the praises of God and in the hope of men, for Jesus Christ and in the Holy Spirit ».

When Pope Francis (Address to the 68. But National Liturgical Week, Rome, August 24, 2017) reminds us that "after this teaching, after this long journey we can say with confidence and with magisterial authority that the liturgical reform is irreversible," wants to tell us the only direction in which we are joyfully called to direct our commitment as Pastors.

We entrust to Mary, Mother of the Church, our service to "preserve the unity of the spirit through the bond of peace" (Eph 4: 3).

From the headquarters of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, on 4 December 2021, the 58th anniversary of the promulgation of the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy Sacrosanctum Concilium .

✠ Arthur Roche
Prefect

 

The Supreme Pontiff Francis, in the course of an audience granted to the Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments on 18 November 2021, was informed and gave his consent to the publication of these RESPONSA AD DUBIA with attached NOTES EXPLANATORY .

 

 Traditionis custodes

 Art. 3. Episcopus, in dioecesibus ubi adhuc unus vel plures coetus celebrant secundum Missale antecedens instaurationem years 1970:

 [...]

 § 2. statuat unum vel plures locos ubi fideles, qui his coetibus adhaerent, convenire possint ad Eucharistiam celebrandam (nec autem in ecclesiis paroecialibus nec novas paroecias personales erigens);   

 

To the question proposed:

Where there is no possibility of identifying a church or oratory or chapel available to welcome the faithful who celebrate with the Missale Romanum ( editio typica 1962), the diocesan Bishop can ask the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments for dispensation from disposition of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes (art. 3 § 2), and, therefore, to allow the celebration in the parish church?

Answer:

Affirmatively.

Explanatory note.

The Motu proprio Traditionis custodes in art. 3 § 2 requests that the Bishop, in dioceses in which up to now there is the presence of one or more groups celebrating according to the Missal prior to the 1970 reform, "indicate one or more places where the faithful adhering to these groups can gather for the Eucharistic celebration (but not in parish churches and without erecting new personal parishes) ". The exclusion of the parish church means that the Eucharistic celebration according to the previous rite, being a concession limited to the aforementioned groups, is not part of the ordinary life of the parish community.

This Congregation, exercising the authority of the Holy See for the matter within its competence (cf. Traditionis custodes , n. 7), can grant, at the request of the diocesan Bishop, that the parish church be used for the celebration according to the Missale. Romanum of 1962 only if it is ascertained the impossibility of using another church, oratory or chapel. The assessment of this impossibility must be made with scrupulous attention.

Furthermore, this celebration is not appropriate for it to be included in the timetable of parish Masses as it is attended only by the faithful adhering to the group. Finally, it should be avoided that there is concomitance with the pastoral activities of the parish community. It is understood that when another location becomes available, this license will be withdrawn.

In these provisions there is no intention to marginalize the faithful who are rooted in the preceding celebratory form: they have only the purpose of remembering that it is a concession to provide for their good (in view of the common use of the only lex orandi of the Roman Rite) and not an opportunity to promote the previous rite.

Traditionis custodes

Art. 1. Liturgical books promulgated a sanctis Pontificibus Paulo VI and Ioanne Paulo II, iuxta decreta Vatican Council II, unica expressio “legis orandi” Ritus Romani sunt.

Art. 8. Normae, dispositiones, concessiones et consuetudines antecedentes, quae conformes non sint cum harum Litterarum Apostolicarum Motu Proprio datarum praescriptis, abrogantur.    

To the question proposed:

Is it possible, in accordance with the provisions of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes , to celebrate the Sacraments with the Ritual Romanum and the Pontificale Romanum preceding the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council?

Answer:

Negatively.

Only to canonically erected personal parishes which, according to the provisions of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes , celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962, the diocesan bishop is authorized to grant the license to use only the Ritual Romanum (ultima editio typica 1952) and not the Pontifical Romanum preceding the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council.

Explanatory note.

The Motu proprio Traditionis custodes wants to re-establish in the whole Church of the Roman Rite a single and identical prayer that expresses its unity, according to the liturgical books promulgated by the Holy Pontiffs Paul VI and John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of the Second Vatican Council and in in line with the tradition of the Church.

The diocesan Bishop, as moderator, promoter and guardian of the whole liturgical life, must work to ensure that his diocese returns to a unitary celebratory form (cf. Pope Francis, Letter to the Bishops of the whole world to accompany the text of the Motu Proprio " Traditionis custodes ") .

This congregation, exercising, for matters within its competence, the authority of the Holy See (cf. traditionis custodes , n. 7), believes that, wanting to advance in the direction indicated by the Motu Proprio, we should not grant permission to use the Ritual Romanum and the Pontificale Romanum preceding the liturgical reform, liturgical books which, like all previous norms, instructions, concessions and customs, have been abrogated (cf. Traditionis custodes , n. 8).

Only to canonically erected personal parishes which, according to the provisions of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes , celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962, the diocesan bishop is authorized to grant the license to use only the Ritual Romanum (ultima editio typica 1952) and not the Pontifical Romanum preceding the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council. It should be remembered that the formula for the Sacrament of Confirmation was changed for the whole Latin Church by Saint Paul VI with the Apostolic Constitution Divinæ consortium naturæ (August 15, 1971).

This provision intends to underline the need to clearly affirm the direction indicated by the Motu Proprio which sees in the liturgical books promulgated by the Holy Pontiffs Paul VI and John Paul II, in accordance with the decrees of the Second Vatican Council, the only expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite (cf. Traditionis custodes , n. 1).

In implementing the provisions, care should be taken to accompany those who are rooted in the previous celebratory form towards a full understanding of the value of the celebration in the ritual form given to us by the reform of the Second Vatican Council, through an adequate formation that makes it possible to discover how it is a witness to a faith. unchanged, expression of a renewed ecclesiology, primary source of spirituality for the Christian life.

Traditionis custodes

Art. 3. Episcopus, in dioecesibus ubi adhuc unus vel plures coetus celebrant secundum Missale antecedens instaurationem years 1970:

§ 1. certior fiat coetus illos auctoritatem ac legitimam naturam instaurationis liturgicae, normarum Vatican Council II Magisteriique Summorum Pontificum non excludere;       

To the question proposed:

In the event that a presbyter who has been granted the use of the Missale Romanum of 1962 does not recognize the validity and legitimacy of the concelebration - refusing to concelebrate, in particular, in the Chrism Mass - can he continue to take advantage of this concession?

Answer:

Negatively.

However, before revoking the concession to use the Missale Romanum of 1962, the Bishop should take care to establish a fraternal confrontation with the priest, to ensure that this attitude does not exclude the validity and legitimacy of the liturgical reform, of the dictates of the Second Vatican Council. and of the Magisterium of the Supreme Pontiffs and to accompany him towards the understanding of the value of concelebration, in particular in the Chrism Mass.

Explanatory note.

Art. 3 § 1 of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes asks the diocesan Bishop to ascertain that the groups that ask to celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962 "do not exclude the validity and legitimacy of the liturgical reform, of the dictates of the Second Vatican Council and of the Magisterium of the Supreme Popes ".

St Paul strongly reminds the community of Corinth to live unity as a necessary condition for being able to participate in the Eucharistic table (cf. 1 Cor 11: 17-34).

In the Letter sent to the Bishops of the whole world to accompany the text of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes, the Holy Father expresses himself thus: "Since" liturgical celebrations are not private actions, but celebrations of the Church, which is the sacrament of unity "(cf. Sacrosanctum Concilium n.26 ), must be done in communion with the Church. The Second Vatican Council, while reaffirming the external bonds of incorporation into the Church - the profession of faith, of the sacraments, of communion -, affirmed with Saint Augustine that it is a condition for salvation to remain in the Church not only "with the body", but also "with the heart" (cf. Lumen Gentium n. 14) ».

The explicit desire not to participate in the concelebration, in particular in the Chrism Mass, seems to express a lack both of acceptance of the liturgical reform and of ecclesial communion with the Bishop, necessary requisites to be able to take advantage of the concession to celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962.

However, before revoking the concession to use the Missale Romanum of 1962, the Bishop should offer the priest the time necessary for a sincere discussion on the deepest reasons that lead him not to recognize the value of concelebration, in particular in the Mass presided over by the Bishop, inviting him to live in the eloquent gesture of concelebration that ecclesial communion which is a necessary condition for being able to participate in the table of the Eucharistic sacrifice.

Traditionis custodes

Art. 3. Episcopus, in dioecesibus ubi adhuc unus vel plures coetus celebrant secundum Missale antecedens instaurationem years 1970:

[...]

§ 3. constituat, in loco statuto, dies quibus celebrationes eucharisticae secundum Missale Romanum a sancto Ioanne XXIII anno 1962 promulgatum permittuntur. His in celebrationibus, lectiones proclamentur lingua vernacula, adhibitis Sacrae Scripturae translationibus ad usum liturgicum ab unaquaque Conferentia Episcoporum approbatis;     

To the question proposed:

In the Eucharistic celebration with the use of the Missale Romanum of 1962, is it possible to use the complete text of the Bible for the readings by choosing the pericopes indicated in the same Missal?

Affirmatively.

Explanatory note.

Art. 3 § 3 of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes establishes that the readings are proclaimed in the vernacular language, using the translations of Sacred Scripture for liturgical use, approved by the respective Episcopal Conferences.

Since the texts of the readings are contained in the Missal itself and therefore the book of the Lectionary does not exist, in order to observe the provisions of the Motu Proprio, one must necessarily have recourse to the book of Sacred Scripture in the translation approved by the individual Episcopal Conferences for liturgical use, choosing the pericopes indicated in the 1962 Missale Romanum .

No publication of Lectionaries in the vernacular that reports the cycle of readings of the previous rite may be authorized.

It should be remembered that the current Lectionary is one of the most precious fruits of the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council. The publication of the Lectionary in addition to overcoming the "plenary" form of the Missale Romanum of 1962 to return to the ancient tradition of the individual books corresponding to the individual ministries, realizes what is hoped for in Sacrosanctum Concilium at n. 51: "In order that the table of the word of God be prepared for the faithful with greater abundance, the treasures of the Bible should be opened more widely so that, in a determined number of years, most of the Holy Scripture is read to the people".

Traditionis custodes

Art. 4. Presbyteri ordinati post has Litteras Apostolicas Motu Proprio datas promulgatas, celebrate volentes iuxta Missale Romanum anno 1962 editum, petitionem formalem Episcopo dioecesano mittere debent, here, ante concessionm, a Sede Apostolica licentiam rogabit.    

To the question proposed:

Does the diocesan Bishop have to be authorized by the Apostolic See to be able to grant to priests ordained after the publication of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes to celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962 (cf. Traditionis custodes n. 4)?

Answer:

Affirmatively.

Explanatory note.

The Latin text (official reference text) in art. 4 reads as follows: "Presbyteri ordinati post has Litteras Apostolicas Motu Proprio datas promulgatas, celebrate volentes iuxta Missale Romanum anno 1962 editum, petitionem formalem Episcopo dioecesano mittere debent, here, before concession, a Sede Apostolica licentiam rogabit".

This is not a simple consultative opinion, but a necessary authorization given to the diocesan Bishop by the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, which exercises the authority of the Holy See for the matter within its competence ( cf. Traditionis custodes , n. 7).

Only having received this license will the diocesan Bishop be able to authorize priests ordained after the publication of the Motu Proprio (July 16, 2021) to celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962.

This norm is intended to offer help to the diocesan Bishop in evaluating this request: his discernment will be taken into due consideration by the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments.

The Motu Proprio clearly expresses the will that the one contained in the liturgical books promulgated by the Holy Pontiffs Paul VI and John Paul II be recognized as the only expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite, in conformity with the decrees of the Second Vatican Council: it is therefore absolutely It is desirable that priests ordained after the publication of the Motu Proprio share this desire of the Holy Father.

Wishing with solicitude to walk in the direction indicated by Pope Francis, all seminary formators are encouraged to accompany future deacons and presbyters in understanding and experiencing the richness of the liturgical reform desired by the Second Vatican Council: it has been able to value every element of the Roman Rite and favored - as wished by the Council Fathers - the full, conscious and active participation of the whole People of God in the liturgy (cf. Sacrosanctum Concilium n. 14), primary source of authentic Christian spirituality.

Traditionis custodes

Art. 5. Presbyteri, qui iam secundum Missale Romanum anno 1962 editum celebrant, ab Episcopo dioecesano licentiam rogabunt ad hanc facultatem servandam.         

To the question proposed:

Can the right to celebrate with the use of the 1962 Missale Romanum be granted ad tempus?

Answer:

Affirmatively.

Explanatory note.

The choice of granting the use of the 1962 Missale Romanum for a defined time - of the duration that the diocesan Bishop deems appropriate - is not only possible but also recommended: the end of the defined period offers the possibility of verifying that everything is in harmony. with the orientation established by the Motu Proprio. The outcome of this verification may provide the reasons for extending or suspending the concession.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To the question proposed:

Is the faculty of celebrating with the use of the Missale Romanum of 1962 granted by the diocesan bishop valid only for the territory of his diocese?

Answer:

Affirmatively.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To the question proposed:

In case of absence or impossibility of the authorized priest, must the person replacing him also have a formal authorization?

Answer:

Affirmatively.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To the question proposed:

Do the deacons and ministers instituted who participate in the celebration with the use of the Missale Romanum of 1962 have to be authorized by the diocesan bishop?

Answer:

Affirmatively.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To the question proposed:

Can a priest authorized to celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962, which because of his office (parish priest, chaplain, ...) also celebrates on weekdays with the Missale Romanum of the reform of the Second Vatican Council, can combine using the Missale Romanum of 1962?

Answer:

Negatively.

Explanatory note.

The parish priest or chaplain who - in the fulfillment of his office - celebrates on weekdays with the current Missale Romanum , the only expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite, cannot combine celebrating with the Missale Romanum of 1962, either with a group or privately .

It is not possible to grant the bination due to the fact that the case of the "just cause" or "pastoral necessity" required by can. 905 § 2: the right of the faithful to the Eucharistic celebration is in no way denied since the possibility of participating in the Eucharist in the current ritual form is offered.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To the question proposed:

Can a presbyter authorized to celebrate with the 1962 Missale Romanum celebrate with the same Missal on the same day for another group of faithful who have received the authorization?

Answer:

Negatively.

Explanatory note.

It is not possible to grant the bination due to the fact that the case of the "just cause" or "pastoral necessity" required by can. 905 § 2: the right of the faithful to the Eucharistic celebration is is in no way denied since the possibility of participating in the Eucharist in the current ritual form is offered.

Irish Politicians Vote for Maximum Pain for Aborted Babies

Irish politicians hit a new low this evening, by celebrating Christmas with a vote to make sure that babies will feel as much pain as possible while they are being aborted.

In a sick and sadistic development, Irish politicians, including many from Sinn Fein, openly mocked the idea of administering pain relief to babies as they were being killed in abortion.

The bill had been brought forward by a number of prolife TDs including Carol Nolan, who spoke of the fact that many liberal TDs will vote for banning cruelty to animals but not to unborn babies. The government ultimately blocked it with 107 votes against 37.

Another TD, Michael Collins, also pointed out the need for pain relief as many babies feel severe pain as they are being killed by needle or forceps.

Danny Healy Rae spoke movingly of how society lets babies down by having them killed in the womb. He also rightfully pointed out that those who support abortion were also part of governments that made life a living hell for mothers and fathers.

We need to do more to help mothers, and fathers, indeed, to ensure there is another way. We are not doing that. Many here were hell-bent on ensuring that the abortion legislation went through. That was their right and for those who voted for it that was their right. But that is not to say that I say it is right. I think that these children, if they grew up, and they do grow up and they are not long becoming men and women, would have been a massive asset to this country. The Government, by its amendment, is looking to delay this. I want to remind the Minister that 18 babies are being aborted daily so they are going to suffer pain. It is 126 weekly and over 6,000 in a year. Surely we should not be wasting time. Is there humanity in the Minister or any of the Government? If there is, now is the time to stand up and do what we ask which is just to administer pain relief in the course of these abortions where we are ending little babies lives.

Michael Healy Rae followed the same line of argument, stating:

How could any human being look me straight in the eye and say with any conviction and with any honesty in his heart and soul that it is wrong to want to stop a little person of feeling pain? Every one of us will have to die and how a person could face God after denying a person the right to pain relief is hard to understand. If I was under any one of their whips tonight, I would crack the whip back at them and I would vote with my conscience.

In a typically disgusting display from Sinn Fein, fresh from imposing Westminster’s abortion of disabled Irish babies in the North, David Cullinane stated that he wants the South to also be under London’s abortion jurisdiction:

Sinn Féin is committed to delivering the same services, North and South. We want to see the alignment and delivery of abortion services across the island, and the services available in this State implemented in the North.

We would include some of the other statements supporting babies being aborted with maximum pain, but they were of such low quality, of the kinds of American Lite soundbite clichéd talking points that we dare not waste your time or your brain cells reading the words of people who have no idea of what they are talking about.

We will give one risible example of the low quality of debate, from Ivana Bacik, of pro IMF party Labour:

We will update when we have the full list of those who voted against the measure, but you may notice the name on the teller for the Yes side, Jack Chambers, who was once a stalwart of the prolife movement and who still has the loyalty of many ‘Catholic’ voters.

Sinn Fein Votes Against Babies With Disabilities

Sinn Fein have sent a strong Christmas message to people with disabilities, by voting to ensure that they can be aborted at up to 40 weeks of pregnancy if they have Down Syndrome, a cleft palate or club foot.

The party have become radicalised in their work as enforcers of Britain’s abortion edict in Northern Ireland, a law for which they accepted British rule in the province for the first time in history.

In a vote last night, Sinn Fein continued to add controversy to their already controversial festive season by having 26 MLAs vote loud and strong against proposals to limit abortions on babies who have disabilities.

So called ‘human rights’ group Amnesty International expressed their satisfaction with the gruesome result, which will inevitably lead to essentially the elimination of peoples with Down Syndrome in the North of Ireland as it has done in everywhere else where it has been introduced.

There is simply no doubt about it, Sinn Fein want Ireland in the Commonwealth, they want the 12th of July to be a celebration of anti Catholicism from Belfast to Cork and they want little Irish babies to be killed in the womb because Britain ordered them to do it. To support Sinn Fein now means to oppose an Irish Republic, the Catholic faith and people with disabilities.

In a news story by the BBC last year, one mother of a child with Down Syndrome spoke of how she was offered 15 abortions to kill her baby, but that she was offered no support in order to have him and to raise him.

This is what Sinn Fein have voted for, all in their desperate efforts to do the work of Westminster.

Down's syndrome: 'In all honesty we were offered 15 terminations' - BBC News

Police Supervise French Mass After Beheading Threats

A recent terrorist incident in Nanterre, France has shaken the Catholic world.

The violent Islamist attack on a Marian Procession has barely made a dent in the secular media however, with mainstream European news outlets refusing to carry the story of torches being swiped from faithful, a priest being spat on by Islamists and threats to decapitate Catholics in the name of the Quran.

Now, images have emerged of Mass in the town being supervised by police as the threats were eerily similar to events in recent years in Normandy and Nice, where a priest and parishioners had their heads severed from their bodies during Mass.

To their credit, a number of Muslim groups have done what President Emmanuel Macron is refusing to do and have condemned the terrorism against Catholics.

Social Media ROASTS Irish Journalist's Bishop Tweet

The frosty relationship between Irish Catholics and the Irish State’s Propaganda Arm has grown ever colder over the course of the past year. As a result, listenership at RTE has completely collapsed.

Much of this stems from the station’s decision to use public monies to accuse Catholics of worshipping a ‘rapist God’ in a New Year’s Eve ‘comedy’ sketch.

In a tweet this week, Education Correspondent Emma O’Kelly reminded people of the occasion when principals ‘defied’ bishops by forcing children to attend school on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception.

Perplexed by the apparent cheerleading of forcing children to attend school rather than take a day off with their families and attend church, Twitter users from around the globe expressed bewilderment with the Irish psyche, with many sarcastically stating that the bishops must have been really terrible to express a desire to give kids a day off from school.

Some of those commenting including author Sohrab Ahmari, who wrote ‘Big L for Ireland’.

French Catholic Procession Attacked by Islamists

French Catholicism has hit the headlines in many different ways over the past number of weeks.

There has been the scandal involving the Archbishop of Paris who has now resigned, there has been the proposed wreckovation of Notre Dame and there was also the protest against a secular concert at a church in Nantes.

Now, a far more sinister story has emerged from Nanterre.

A number of Catholics were attending a Marian Procession in the town when a large group of Muslim men attacked them.

The Muslims shut down the event, screaming ‘THIS IS THE LAND OF ALLAH, ON THE QURAN I WILL SLIT YOUR THROAT!’ echoing the recent martyrdom of Father Jacques Hamyl in Normandy in 2016 and three Catholics in Nice last year.

The details of the attack were released in a Twitter thread belonging to an account which has since been deleted, apparently due to threats.

Twitter user Nicolas Phillippe wrote:

Today we celebrated the immaculate conception in our parish of Fontenelles in Nanterre. For the occasion, a short procession of 1km is organized in the evening with the statue of the blessed virgin as well as songs to the virgin

After only a hundred meters, for our first stop, we began to be insulted by passers-by. Then several young men began to surround us, in total a big dozen, who sneered while insulting us

Then sneers followed increasingly violent insults "children of whores", "gang of whores",then increasingly Christiannophobic words "here is not a cathedral", "you are khouffars of disbelievers", "break you are not at home" 

Faced with the hostility of these young people, it was decided to continue the procession route. There, they get closer to us, the insults become more and more violent, and it spits on the ground in our direction.

The father is attacked first being at the head of the procession. He gets spat on, then thrown cold water. The tension rises, and the group that surrounded us comes into contact. "wallah on the Qur'an I'm going to slit your throat." 

The father explains that it is a procession dedicated to the virgin. Nothing to do, "this is the land of Allah, break yourself". Other words are spoken in Arabic, while several parishioners are violently jostled by these young

We were followed and insulted for almost the entire duration of the procession, under infamous words, which were covered by songs to the virgin. In the end, calm only returned when we returned to the Church, where a police patrol was waiting for us because alerted

No one was injured, but the parishioners were shocked by this inexplicable violence towards a simple procession that was done in a good mood, authorized in the prefecture and on a classic course. The hatred in their eyes was there, without being able to explain it.

Honestly, the climate is very heavy, and it is more and more complicated, even dangerous, to be a Christian in certain territories. I am not trying to take pity only to explain the verbal and physical violence that Christians in France face

Most of the shocking details were confirmed today by the diocese’s social media:

A Marian procession took place at Hauts de Seine prefecture

During this march were planned two stops. During the first stop the procession was taken to task by several people who uttered insults and coarse and violent threats. The torch of a devotee was snatched and thrown on the participants. The procession started again and continued to be joined by the police until Saint Marie des Fontenelles. A complaint is about to be filed. The Diocese has contacted the public authorities so that the public so that the security of legitimately iniquitous faithful is fully assured now and in the future.

With the French Presidential Election currently focusing on the disparate nature of French society, priests being spat on by Muslim gangs threatening to slit the throats of Catholics carrying statues of Our Lady can only add more urgency to the need to solve France’s broken identity.

Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange on the Immaculate Conception

[Because of] the nobility of Mary's title, Mother of God, it is . . . appropriate to examine the meaning and implications of the words spoken to her by the Angel Gabriel on the day of the Annunciation: 'Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: Blessed art thou among women' (Luke 1: 28). As a help to understanding these words spoken in God's name we shall consider: 1st-----the different plenitudes of grace; 2nd-----the privilege of the Immaculate Conception; 3rd-----the sublimity of Mary's first grace.

Article I
THE DIFFERENT PLENITUDES OF GRACE

According to the usage of Holy Scripture, which becomes more and more explicit in the New Testament, it is grace in the strict sense of the term which is implied in the term 'fulness of grace'-----that is to say, grace which is really distinct from nature, both human and Angelic, grace which is a free gift of God surpassing the natural powers and exigencies of all nature, created or creatable. [l] Habitual or sanctifying grace makes us participate in the very nature, in the inner life of God, according to the words of St. Peter (2 Peter 1: 4): 'By whom he hath given us most great and precious promises: that by these you may be made partakers of the divine nature.' By grace we have become adopted children of God, heirs and co-heirs with Christ (Rom. 8: 17); by grace we are 'born of God' (John i, 13). It prepares us to receive eternal life as a heritage and as a reward of the merits of which it is itself the principle. It is even the germ of eternal life, the semen gloriae as Tradition terms it, since by it we are disposed in advance for the face to face vision and the beatific love of God.

Habitual grace is received into the very essence of the soul as a supernatural graft which elevates and deifies its vitality. From it there flows into the faculties the infused virtues, theological and moral, and the seven gifts of the Holy Ghost, all of which supernatural organism constitutes a sort of second nature of such a kind as to enable us to perform connaturally the supernatural and meritorious acts of the infused virtues and the seven gifts. We have, too, by habitual grace the Blessed Trinity dwelling within us as in a temple where They are known and loved, even as it were experimentally. And at times we do know Them in this quasi-experimental fashion when by a special grace They make Themselves known to us as the life of our life, for '. . . you have received the spirit of adoption of sons, whereby we cry Abba [Father]' (Rom. 8: 15). Then does the Holy Ghost inspire us with filial love, and in that sense '. . . the Spirit Himself giveth testimony to our spirit, that we are the sons of God' (Rom. 8: 16).

While habitual grace makes us thus children of God, actual or transitory grace first of all disposes us for adoptive childhood, and subsequently makes us act, through the infused virtues and gifts working separately or both together, in a manner becoming God's children. This new life of grace, virtues and gifts, is none other than eternal life begun on earth, since habitual grace and charity will outlive the passage of time.

Grace-----call it, if you will, a participation in the Divine nature-----was no less gratuitous for the Angels than for us. As St. Augustine says (De Civ. Dei, XII, c. 9): 'God created them, at the same instant forming their nature and endowing them with grace.' When creating the Angels God conferred grace on them, to which grace their nature, richly endowed though it was, could lay no claim. The Angels, and man also, could have been created in a purely natural condition, lacking the Divine graft whence issues a new life.

The grace intended in the words 'Hail, full of grace' addressed to Our Lady is therefore something higher than nature or the exigencies of nature, created or merely possible.

It is a participation in the Divine nature or in the inner life of God, which makes the soul to enter into the kingdom of God, a kingdom far surpassing all the kingdoms of nature-----mineral, vegetable, animal, human, and even Angelic. So elevated is grace that St. Thomas could say: 'The good of the grace of one soul is greater than the good of the nature of the whole universe.'

The least degree of grace in the soul of a newly Baptized child is worth more than all created natures, including those that are Angelic. Being a participation in the inner life of God, grace is something greater than all miracles and exterior signs of Divine revelation or of the sanctity of God's favoured servants. And it is of this grace, germ and promise of glory, that the Angel spoke when he said to Mary: 'Hail, full of grace.' Gazing at Mary's soul, he saw that, though he himself was in the possession of the Beatific Vision, Mary's grace and charity far surpassed his for she possessed them in the degree required to become at that instant the Mother of God.

Mary, of course, had received from the Most High natural gifts of body and soul in wonderful perfection. Judged even from the natural level, the soul of Jesus united in itself all that there is of beauty and nobility in the souls of the great poets and artists, of men of genius and of men of generosity. In an analogous way the soul of Mary was a Divine masterpiece because of the natural perfection of her intelligence and will and sensibility. There is no shadow of doubt that she was more gifted than anyone who has ever struck us as remarkable for penetration and sureness of mind, for strength of will, for equilibrium or harmony of higher and lower faculties. Since she had been preserved from Original Sin and its baneful effects, concupiscence and darkness of understanding, her body did not weigh down her mind but rather served it. When forming the body of a Saint, God has in mind the soul which is to vivify it: when forming Mary's body He had in mind the Body and the infinitely holy Soul of the Word made flesh. As St. Albert the Great loves to recall, the Fathers of the Church say that Mary, viewed even naturally, had the grace of Rebecca, the beauty of Rachel, and the gentle majesty of Esther. They add that her chaste beauty never held the gaze for its own sake alone, but always lifted souls up to God.

The more perfect these gifts of nature in Mary, the more elevated they make her grace appear, for it surpasses them immeasurably.

When speaking of fulness of grace it is well to note that it exists in three different degrees in Our Lord, in Mary, and in the just. St. Thomas explains this a number of times.

There is, first of all, the absolute fulness of grace which is peculiar to Jesus, the Saviour of mankind. Taking into consideration only the ordinary power of God, there can be no greater grace than this. It is the eminent and inexhaustible source of all the grace which all men have received since the Fall, or will receive till the end of time. It is the source also of the beatitude of the elect, for Jesus has merited all the effects of our predestination.

There is, in the second place, the fulness of superabundance which is Mary's special privilege, and which is so named since it is like a spiritual river which has poured of its abundance upon the souls of men for almost two thousand years.

There is finally the fullness of sufficiency which is common to all the just and which makes them capable of performing those meritorious acts-----they normally become more perfect in the course of years-----which lead them to eternal life.

These three fullness have been well compared to an inexhaustible spring, to the stream or river which flows from it, and to the different canals fed by the river, which irrigate and make fertile the whole region they traverse-----that is to say, the whole Church, universal in time and space. The river of grace proceeds from God through the Saviour, as we read 'Drop down dew, ye heavens, from above, and let the clouds rain the just: let the earth be opened, and bud forth a saviour' (Is. 14: 8). And then finally it rises once more to God, the Ocean of peace, in the form of merits, prayers, and sacrifices.

To continue the image: the fulness of the spring has not increased; that of the river, on the contrary, which flows from it has increased. Or, to speak in plain terms, the absolute fulness of Our Saviour knew no increase, for it was sovereignly perfect from the first instant of His conception by reason of the personal union with the Word. For, from the first instant, the lumen gloriae and the Beatific Vision were communicated to Jesus's soul, so that the second Council of Constantinople could say (Denz. 224) that Christ did not grow more perfect by reason of His meritorious acts: 'Ex profectu operum non melioratus est.' Mary's fulness of grace, however, did not cease to increase up to the time of her death. For that reason theologians usually speak of, 1st-----her initial fullness or plenitude; 2nd-----the fulness of her second sanctification at the instant of the conception of the Saviour; 3rd-----the final fulness [at the instant of her entry into glory], its extent, and its superabundance.

Article II
THE PRIVILEGE OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION

The initial fulness of grace in Mary presents two aspects. One is negative, at least in its formulation: her preservation from Original Sin. The other is positive: her conception, absolutely pure and holy by reason of the perfection of her initial sanctifying grace in which were rooted the infused virtues and the gifts of the Holy Ghost.

The Dogmatic Definition

The definition of the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, made by Pius IX on December 8th, 1854, reads as follows: 'We declare, announce, and define that the doctrine which states that the Blessed Virgin Mary was preserved, in the first instant of her conception, by a singular grace and privilege of God Omnipotent and because of the merits of Jesus Christ the Saviour of the human race, free from all stain of Original Sin, is revealed by God and must therefore be believed firmly and with constancy by all the faithful' (Denz. 1641).

This definition contains three especially important points: 1st-----It affirms that the Blessed Virgin was preserved from all stain of Original Sin from the first instant of her conception. The conception meant is that known as passive or consummated-----that in which her soul was created and united to her body-----for it is then only that one can speak of a human person, whereas the definition bears on a privilege granted to the person of Mary. The definition states also that the Immaculate Conception is a special privilege and an altogether singular grace, the work of Divine Omnipotence.

What are we to understand by Original Sin from which Mary has been preserved? The Church has not defined its intrinsic nature, but she has taught us something about it by telling us its effects: the Divine hatred or malediction, a stain on the soul, a state of non-justice or spiritual death, servitude under the empire of Satan, subjection to the law of concupiscence, subjection to suffering and to bodily death in so far as they are the penalty of the common sin. These effects presuppose the loss of the sanctifying grace which, along with integrity of nature, Adam had received for us and for himself, and which he lost by sin, also for us and for himself.

It follows therefore that Mary was not preserved free from every stain of Original Sin otherwise than by receiving sanctifying grace into her soul from the first instant of her conception. Thus she was conceived in that state of justice and holiness which is the effect of the Divine friendship as opposed to the Divine malediction, and in consequence she was withdrawn from the slavery of the devil and subjection to the law of concupiscence. She was withdrawn too from subjection to the law of suffering and death, considered as penalties of the sin of our nature, [8] even though both Jesus and Mary knew suffering and death in so far as they are consequences of our nature [in carne passibili] and endured them for our salvation.

2nd-----It is affirmed in the definition, as it was already affirmed in 1661 by Alexander VIII (Denz. 1100) that it was through the merits of Jesus Christ, the Saviour of the human race, that Mary was preserved from Original Sin. Hence the opinion held by some 13th-century theologians-----that Mary was immaculate in the sense of not needing to be redeemed, and that her first grace was independent of the future merits of her Son-----may no longer be admitted. According to the Bull Ineffabilis Deus, Mary was redeemed by the merits of her Son in a most perfect way, by a redemption which did not free her from a stain already contracted, but which preserved her from contracting one. Even in human affairs we look on one as more a saviour if he wards off a blow than if he merely heals the wound it inflicts.

The idea of a preservative redemption reminds us that Mary, being a child of Adam and proceeding from him by way of natural generation, should have incurred the hereditary taint, and would have incurred it in fact had not God decided from all eternity to grant her the unique privilege of an immaculate conception in dependence on the future merits of her Son.

The liturgy had already made this point in the prayer proper to the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, which was approved by Sixtus IV (1476): 'Thou hast preserved her [Mary] from all stain through the foreseen death of this same Son.' The Blessed Virgin was preserved from Original Sin by the future death of her Son, that is to say, by the merits of Christ dying for us on the Cross.

It is therefore clear that Mary's preservation from Original Sin differs essentially from that of the Saviour. Jesus was not redeemed by the merits of another, not even by His Own. He was preserved from Original Sin and from all sin for two reasons: first because of the personal or hypostatic union of His humanity to the Word in the very instant in which His sacred soul was created, since it could not be that sin should ever be attributed to the Word made flesh; secondly, since His conception was virginal and due to the operation of the Holy Ghost, so that Jesus did not descend from Adam by way of natural generation. [9]

These two reasons are peculiar to Jesus alone.

3rd-----The definition proposes the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception as revealed, that is, as contained at least implicitly in the deposit of Revelation-----in Scripture and Tradition, or in one at least of those two sources.

The Testimony of the Scriptures

The Bull Ineffabilis Deus quotes two texts of Scripture, Genesis 3: 15, and Luke 1: 28, 42.

The privilege of the Immaculate Conception is revealed as it were implicitly or confusedly in the book of Genesis in the words spoken by God to the serpent, and thereby to Satan: 'I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.' The pronoun we translate as 'she' in 'she shall crush thy head' is masculine in the Hebrew text, and stands for the posterity or seed of the woman; this is true also of the Septuagint and the Syraic versions. The Vulgate however has the feminine pronoun 'ipsa', referring the prophecy directly to the woman herself However there is no essential difference of meaning between the two readings since the woman is to be associated with the victory of Him Who will be the great representative of her posterity in their conflict with Satan throughout the ages.

Taken by themselves these words are certainly not sufficient to prove that the Immaculate Conception is revealed. But the Fathers of the Church, in their comparison of Eve and Mary, have seen in them an allusion to it, and it is on that account that the text is cited by Pius IX.

To the naturalist exegete the text means no more than the instinctive revulsion man experiences towards the serpent. But to the Jewish and Christian tradition it means much more. The Christian tradition sees in that promise-----it has been termed the protoevangelium-----the first sketch of the Messiah and His victory over the spirit of evil. For Jesus is pre-eminently the posterity of the woman in conflict with the posterity of the serpent. But if Jesus is termed the posterity of the woman, that is not because of His remote connection with Eve, who was able to pass on to her descendants only a fallen and wounded nature, deprived of the Divine life. Rather is it because of His connection with Mary, in whose womb He took a stainless humanity. As Fr. F. X. Le Bachelet says, in col. 118 of the article referred to already, 'We do not find in Eve the principle of that enmity which God will put between the race of the woman and the race of the serpent; for Eve, like Adam, is herself fallen a victim to the serpent. It is only between Mary, Mother of the Redeemer, that enmity ultimately exists. Hence the person of Mary is included, though in a veiled manner, in the protoevangelium, and the Vulgate reading 'ipsa' [she] expresses something really implied in the sacred text, since the victory of the Redeemer is morally, but really, the victory of His Mother.'

For that reason early Christianity never ceased to contrast Eve who shared in Adam's sin by yielding to the serpent's suggestion with Mary who shared in the redemptive work of Christ by believing the words of the Angel on the morning of the Annunciation.

The promise of Genesis speaks of a victory that will be complete: 'She shall crush thy head.' And since the victory over Satan will be complete, so also the victory over sin which makes the soul slave and the devil master. But as Pius IX teaches in the Bull Ineffabilis Deus, the victory over Satan would not be complete if Mary had not been preserved from Original Sin by the merits of her Son: 'De ipso (serpente) plenissime triumphans, illius caput immaculato pede (Maria) contrivit.'

The Immaculate Conception is contained therefore in the promise of Genesis as the oak is contained in the acorn. A person who had never seen an oak could never guess the value of the acorn, nor its final stage of development. But we who have seen the oak know for what the acorn is destined, and that it does not yield an elm nor a poplar. The same law of evolution obtains in the order of progressive Divine revelation.

The Bull Ineffabilis quotes also the salutation addressed by the Angel to Mary (Luke 1: 28): 'Hail, full of grace . . . blessed are thou among woman', as well as the similar words uttered by St. Elizabeth under Divine inspiration (Luke 1: 42). Pius IX does not state that these words are sufficient by themselves to prove that the Immaculate Conception is revealed; for that, the exegetic tradition of the Fathers must be invoked.

This tradition becomes explicit with St. Ephrem the Syrian (d. 373). Among the Greeks it is found on the morrow of the Council of Ephesus (431), especially in the teaching of two bishop-opponents of Nestorious, St. Proclus who was a successor of St. John Chrysostom in the chair of Constantinople (431-446) and Theodore, bishop of Ancyra. Later we find it in the teaching of St. Sophronius, Patriarch of Jerusalem (634-638), Andrew of Crete (d. 740), St. John Damascene [d. towards the middle of the 8th century]. These different testimonies will be found at length in the article Marie of the Dict. Apol., cols. 223-231.

Understood in the light of this exegetic tradition, the words of the Angel to Mary 'Hail, full of grace'-----that is 'Hail, thou art fully pleasing to God and loved by Him'-----are not limited temporally in their application in such a way as to exclude even the initial period of Mary's life. On the contrary, the Blessed Virgin would not have received complete fulness of grace had her soul been even for an instant in the condition of spiritual death which follows on Original Sin, had she been even for an instant deprived of grace, turned away from God, a daughter of wrath, in slavery to the devil. St. Proclus says that she was 'formed from stainless clay'. Theodore of Ancyra says that 'the Son of the Most High came forth from the Most High'. St. John Damascene writes that Mary is the holy daughter of Joachim and Anne 'who has escaped the burning darts of the evil one', that she is a new paradise 'to which the serpent has no stealthy access', that she is exempt from the debt of death which is one of the consequences of Original Sin, and that she must therefore be exempt from the common fall.

If Mary had contracted Original Sin her fulness of grace would have been diminished in this sense that it would not have extended to the whole of her life. Thus, Our Holy Mother the Church, reading the words of the Angelic salutation in the light of Tradition and with the assistance of the Holy Ghost, saw revealed implicitly in it the privilege of the Immaculate Conception. The privilege is revealed in the text not as an effect is in a cause which could exist without it, but as a part is in a whole; the part is actually contained in the whole at least by way of implicit statement.

The Testimony of Tradition

Tradition itself affirms the truth of the Immaculate Conception more and more explicitly in the course of time. St. Justin, St. Irenaeus, Tertullian, contrast Eve, the cause of death, and Mary, the cause of life and salvation. This antithesis is constantly on the lips of the Fathers and is found also in the most solemn documents of the Church's magisterium, especially in the Bull Ineffabilis Deus. It is presented as perfect and without restriction; thus, Mary must always have been greater than Eve, and most particularly at the first moment of her life. The Fathers often say that Mary is stainless, that she has always been blessed by God in honour of her Son, that she is intemerata, intacta, impolluta, intaminata, illibata, altogether without spot.

Comparing Mary and Eve, St. Ephrem says: 'Both were at first simple and innocent, but thereafter Eve became cause of death and Mary cause of life.' Speaking to Our Blessed Lord, he continues: 'You Lord and Your Mother are the only two who are perfectly beautiful under every respect. In You there is no fault, and in Your Mother there is no stain. All other children of God are far from such beauty.'

In much the same way St. Ambrose says of Mary that she is free from every stain of sin 'per gratiam ab omni integra labe peccati'. St. Augustine's comment is well known: 'The honour of the Lord does not permit that the question of sin be raised in connected with the Blessed Virgin Mary.' If however the question be put to the Saints 'Are you sinless?' he affirms that they will answer with the Apostle St. John (1 John, 1: 8): 'If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.' There are two other texts which seem to show that St. Augustine meant his words to be understood in the sense of the Immaculate Conception. Many other texts of the Fathers will be found in the works of Passaglia, Palmieri and Le Bachelet.

It should not be forgotten that the Feast of the Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary has been celebrated in the Church, especially in the Greek Church, since the 7th and 8th centuries. The same Feast is found in Sicily in the 9th, in Ireland in the 10th, and almost everywhere in Europe in the 12th century.

The Lateran Council, held in the year 649 (Denz., 256) calls Mary 'Immaculate'. In 1476 and 1483 Pope Sixtus IV speaks favorably of the privilege in connection with the Feast of the Conception of Mary (Denz., 734 sqq.). The Council of Trent (Denz., 792) declares, when speaking of Original Sin which infects all men, that it does not intend to include the Blessed and Immaculate Virgin Mary. In 1567 Baius is condemned for having taught the contrary (Denz., 1073). In 1661 Alexander VII affirmed the privilege, saying that almost all Catholics held it, though it had not yet been defined (Denz., 1100). Finally, on December 8th, 1854, we have the promulgation of the solemn definition (Denz., 1641).

It must be admitted that in the 12th and 13th centuries certain great doctors, as, for example, St. Bernard, St. Anselm, Peter Lombard, Hugh of St. Victor, St. Albert the Great, St. Bonaventure, and St. Thomas Aquinas appear to have been disinclined to admit the privilege. But this was because they did not consider the precise instant of Mary's animation, or of the creation of her soul, and also because they did not distinguish, with the help of the idea of preservative redemption, between the debt to contract the hereditary stain and its actual contraction. In other words, they did not always distinguish sufficiently between ' debebat contrahere' and contraxit peccatum'. We shall see later that there were three stages in St. Thomas's doctrine and that though he appears to deny the Immaculate Conception in the second, he admits it in the first, and probably in the third also.

Theological Reasons for Admitting the Immaculate Conception

The principal argument ex convenientia, or from becomingness, for the Immaculate Conception, is an elaboration of the one which St. Thomas (IIIa, q. 27, a. I) and others give for Mary's sanctification in her mother's womb before birth. 'It is reasonable to believe that she who gave birth to the Only-begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth, received greater privileges of grace than all others . . . We find however that to some the privilege of sanctification in their mother's womb has been granted, as for example to Jeremias . . . and John the Baptist. . . . Hence it is reasonable to believe that the Blessed Virgin was sanctified before birth.' In a. 5 of the same question we read also: 'The nearer one approaches to the source of all grace the more grace one receives; but Mary came nearest of all to Christ, Who is the principle of grace.'

But this argument ex convenientia needs to be expanded before it will prove the Immaculate Conception.
It is Scotus's glory [Thomists should consider it a point of honour to admit that their adversary was right in this matter] to have shown the supreme becomingness of this privilege in answer to the following difficulty which St. Thomas and many other theologians put forward: Christ is the universal Redeemer of all men without exception (Rom. 3: 23; 5: 12, 19; Gal. 3: 22; 2 Cor. 5: 14; 1 Tim. 2: 16); but if Mary did not contract Original Sin she would not have been redeemed; hence, since she was redeemed, she must have contracted Original Sin.

Duns Scotus answers this objection [36] by referring to the idea of a redemption which is preservative, not liberative. He shows how reasonable this idea is, and in some places at least does not link it up with his peculiar doctrine concerning the motive of the Incarnation, so that it can be admitted independently of what one thinks about the second matter.

This is his line of argument.

It is becoming that a perfect Redeemer should make use of a sovereign mode of redemption, at least in regard to the person of His Mother who was to be associated more closely with Him than anyone else in the work of salvation. But the sovereign mode of redemption is not that which liberates from a stain already contracted, but that which preserves from all stain, just as he who wards off a blow from another saves him more than if he were simply to heal a wound that has been inflicted. Hence it was most becoming that the perfect Redeemer should, by His merits, preserve His Mother from Original Sin and all actual sin. This argument can be found in embryo in Eadmer.

The Bull Ineffabilis gives this argument, in a somewhat different form, along with others. For example, it states that the honour and dishonour alike of parents affect their children, and that it was not becoming that the perfect Redeemer should have a mother who was conceived in sin. Also, just as the Word proceeds eternally from a most holy Father, it was becoming that He should be born on earth of a mother to whom the splendour of sanctity had never been lacking. Finally, in order that Mary should be able to repair the effects of Eve's fall, overcome the wiles of the devil, and give supernatural life to all, with, by, and in Christ, it was becoming that she herself should never have been in a fallen condition, a slave to sin and the devil.

If it be objected that Christ alone is immaculate, it is easy to answer: Christ alone is immaculate of Himself, and by the double title of His Hypostatic Union and His virginal conception; Mary is immaculate through the merits of her Son.

The consequences of the Immaculate Conception have been developed by the great spiritual writers. Mary has been preserved from the two baneful fruits of Original Sin, concupiscence and darkness of understanding.

Since the definition of the Immaculate Conception we are obliged to hold that concupiscence has been not only bound, or restrained, in Mary from the time she was in her mother's womb, but even that she was never in any sense its subject. There could be no disordered movement of her sensitive nature, no escape of her sensibility from the previous control of reason and will. Her sensibility was always fully subject to her rational powers, and thereby to God's Will, as obtained in the state of original innocence. Thus Mary is virgin of virgins, most pure, 'inviolata, intemerata', tower of ivory, most pure mirror of God.

Similarly, Mary was never subject to error or illusion. Her judgment was always enlightened and correct. If she did not understand a thing fully she suspended her judgment upon it, and thus avoided the precipitation which might have been the cause of error. She is, as the Litanies say, the Seat of Wisdom, the Queen of Doctors, the Virgin most prudent, the Mother of good counsel. All theologians realize that nature spoke more eloquently to her of the Creator than to the greatest poets. She had, too, an eminent and wonderfully simple knowledge of what the Scriptures said of the Messiah, the Incarnation, and the Redemption. Thus she was fully exempt from concupiscence and error.

But why did the Immaculate Conception not make Mary immune from pain and death since they too were consequences of Original Sin?

It should be noted that the pain and death which Jesus and Mary knew were not consequences of Original Sin as they are for us. For Jesus and Mary they were consequences of but human nature, which, of itself, and like the animal nature in general, is subject to pain and death of the body: it was only because of a special privilege that Adam had been exempt from them in the state of innocence. As for Jesus, He was conceived virginally in passible flesh in order to redeem us by dying, and when the time came He accepted suffering and death, its consummation, freely for love of us. Mary, for her part, accepted suffering and death voluntarily in imitation of Him and to unite herself to Him; she was one with Him in His expiation and in His work of redemption.

There is one wonderful thing, one delight of contemplatives, which we should not overlook. It is that the privilege of the Immaculate Conception and the fullness of grace did not withdraw Mary from pain, but rather made her all the more sensitive to suffer from contact with sin, the greatest of evils. Precisely because she was so pure, precisely because her heart was consumed by the love of God, Mary suffered pains to which our imperfection makes us insensible. We suffer if our self-love is wounded, or our pride, or our susceptibilities. Mary, however, suffered from sin, and that in the measure of her love of God Whom sin offends, and her love of Her Son Whom sin crucifies; she suffered in the measure of her love of us, whom sin wounds and kills. Thus the Immaculate Conception increased Mary's sufferings and disposed her to bear them heroically. Not one of them did she squander. All passed through her hands in union with those of her Son, thus to be offered up for our salvation.

St. Thomas and the Immaculate Conception

As certain commentators have suggested, three periods may be distinguished in St. Thomas's teaching.
In the first-----that of 1253-1254, the beginning of his theological career-----he supports the privilege, probably because of the liturgical tradition which favoured it, as well as because of his pious admiration for the perfect holiness of the Mother of God. It is in this period that he wrote (I Sent., d. 44, q. I, a. 3, ad 3): 'Purity is increased by withdrawing from its opposite: hence there can be a creature than whom no more pure is possible in creation, if it be free from all contagion of sin: and such was the purity of the Blessed Virgin who was immune from Original and actual sin.' This text states therefore that Mary was so pure as to be exempt from all Original and actual sin.

During the second period St. Thomas, seeing better the difficulties in the question-----for the theologians of his time held that Mary was immaculate independently of Christ's merits-----hesitated, and refused to commit himself. He, of course, held that all men without exception are redeemed by one Saviour (Rom. 3: 23; 5: 12, 19; Gal. 3: 22; 2 Cor. 5: 14; 1 Tim. 2: 6). Hence we find him proposing the question thus in IIIa, q. 27, a. 2: Was the Blessed Virgin sanctified in the conception of her body before its animation? For, according to him and many other theologians, the conception of the body was to be distinguished from the animation, or creation of the soul. This latter [called today the consummated passive conception] was thought to be about a month later in time than the initial conception.

The holy doctor mentions certain arguments at the beginning of the article which favour the Immaculate Conception-----even taking conception to be that which precedes animation. He then answers them as follows: 'There are two reasons why the sanctification of the Blessed Virgin cannot have taken place before her animation: 1st-----the sanctification in question is cleansing from Original Sin . . . but the guilt of sin can be removed only by grace [which has as object the soul itself] . . . 2nd-----if the Blessed Virgin had been sanctified before animation she would have have incurred the stain of Original Sin and would therefore never have stood in need of redemption by Christ. . . . But this may not be admitted, since Christ is Head of all men (1 Tim. 2: 6).'

Even had he written after the definition of 1854 St. Thomas could have said that Mary was not sanctified before animation. However, he goes further than that here, for he adds at the end of the article: 'Hence it follows that the sanctification of the Blessed Virgin took place after her animation.' Nor does he distinguish, as he does in many other contexts, between posteriority in nature and posteriority in time. In the answer to the second objection he even states that the Blessed Virgin 'contracted Original Sin'. [38] However, it must be recognized that the whole point of his argument is to show that Mary incurred the debt of Original Sin since she descended from Adam by way of natural generation. Unfortunately he did not distinguish sufficiently the debt from actually incurring the stain.

Regarding the question of the exact moment at which Mary was sanctified in the womb of her mother, St. Thomas does not make any definite pronouncement. He states that it followed close on animation-----cito post are his words in Quodl. VI, a. 7. But he believes that nothing more precise can be said: 'the time of her sanctification is unknown' (IIIa, q. 27, a. 2, ad 3).

St. Thomas does not consider in the Summa if Mary was sanctified in the very instant of animation. St. Bonaventure had put himself that question and had answered it in the negative. It is possible that St. Thomas's silence was inspired by the reserved attitude of the Roman Church which, unlike so many other Churches, did not celebrate the Feast of the Conception (cf. ibid., ad 3). This is the explanation proposed by Fr. N. del Prado, O.P., in Santo Tomas y la lmmaculada, Vergara, 1909, by Fr. Mandonnet, O.P., Dict. Theol. Cath., art. Freres Precheurs, col. 899, and by Fr. Hugon, O.P., Tractatus Dogmatici, t. II, ed. 5, 1927, p. 749. For these authors the thought of the holy doctor in this second period of his professional career was that expressed long afterwards by Gregory XV in his letters of July 4th, 1622: 'Spiritus Sanctus nondum tanti mysterii arcanum Ecclesiae suae patefecit.'

The texts we have considered so far do not therefore imply any contradiction of the dogma of the Immaculate Conception. They could even be retained if the idea of preservative redemption were introduced. There is however one text which cannot be so easily explained away. In III Sent., dist. III, q. 1, a. 1, ad 2am qm, we read: 'Nor (did it happen) even in the instant of infusion of the soul, namely, by grace being then given her so as to preserve her from incurring the original fault. Christ alone among men has the privilege of not needing redemption.' Frs. del Prado and Hugon explain this text as follows: The meaning of St. Thomas's words may be that the Blessed Virgin was not preserved from Original Sin in such a way as not to incur its debt, as that would mean not to stand in need of redemption. However, one could have expected to find in the text itself the explicit distinction between the debt and the fact of incurring the stain.

In the final period of his career, when writing the Exposito super salutatione angelica----which is certainly authentic ----in 1272 or 1273, St. Thomas expressed himself thus: 'For she [the Blessed Virgin] was most pure in the matter of fault (quantum ad culpam) and incurred neither Original nor mental nor venial sin.'

Based French Catholics Protect Church From Secular Concert

On the even of the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, a group of based French Catholics successfully defended their church in Nantes from being used to make money for a secular pop musician.

Echoing the Gospel story of the money changers in the Temple, these brave Catholics successfully orchestrated to sing hymns and show solidarity outside the Notre Dame de bon Port church in the city of Nantes.

The Mayor of Nantes, Bassem Asseh, has had the gall to condemn Catholics for defending their own church, stating that it impinged ‘freedom of expression’.

The booking of Swedish singer Anna von Hausswolff to play a Catholic church on the even of the Feast of the Immaculate Conception is really quite bizarre, considering her music features such lyrics as:

These pills keep me alive
These pills keep me alive
Oh my love
I'm holding it
Caressing it.
Oh, I'm sick
The heat and cold.
The presence of a dual code.
I'm on the floor constantly, intensivley,
Making love.
I made love
I made love
With the devil
With the devil.
Oh I, I made love with the devil
With the devil.
Oh I, I made love with the devil
With the devil.
Oh I, I made love with the devil
With the devil.
Oh I, I made love with the devil
With the devil.
Devil
With the devil.
Devil.
With the devil.
Devil.
With the devil.

There is no reason to think that the civic authorities could not have arranged a more suitable non religious venue for this concert and had it pass off without trouble. To arrange it in a church on a normal day is offensive, to do so on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception is an act of war.

French media outlets, panicked since the rise of politician Eric Zemmour, have condemned the Catholics, with Le Monde calling them ‘fundamentalist Catholics’ and others calling them ‘integralists’.

Mostly however, they were just young men and women who did not want to see their churches desecrated.

Dublin Puts Christ Back Into Christmas

On the 4th of December near The Spire in Dublin, Irish Society for Christian Civilisation held Christmas Carols and a Rosary near the Crib on O’Connell Street.

If you watch the video below of the event, there is also the explanation of the story behind a famous Christmas song.

It is great to see a public demonstration of faith like this, especially at a time where commercial interests are diluting the Catholic faith from the Christmas season.

Seville Hosts STUNNING Procession

One of the most stunning jewels in the crown of European Catholicism is the majestic series of processions which occur each year in Spain.

On the 75th anniversary of its official recognition by the Holy See, Spanish in the city of Seville honoured the patronage of the Virgen de los Reyes.

There are a number of stories regarding the origin of the icon, including a donation to King Ferdinand III of Castile by King Louis IX of France after a dream, and that it played a part in the Reconquista of Seville in 1248.

In 1946, the Vatican officially recognised the long standing devotion with a ceremony that took place involving Pope Pius XII.

In celebration of that event, thousands took to the streets of Seville today, including marching bands, priests and public officials.

The rich beauty of Spanish Catholicism is something that has been attacked in recent months by members of the White Anglo Saxon Catholic American Blogosphere, with attacks on everyone from Saint Junipero Serra to Christopher Columbus to Queen Isabella to even statues of and stained glasses of the Reconquista. Yet the incredible videos of the Seville processions speak for themselves. Perhaps the ailing European continent can love to learn to herself and feel young once more by reengaging with these treasured traditions and the faith that they venerate.

Irish Group to Host Webinar on Upcoming Synod

Family Solidarity will host a webinar with Sr Nathalie Becquart, under-secretary of the Synod of the Bishop in Rome, and Dr Vincenzo Bassi, president of the European Federation of Catholic Families Organisations (FAFCE).

In October, Pope Francis called the Catholic Church to embark on the synodal journey, asking for a broad participation, particularly at the local level. Sr Nathalie will talk about the role of the family, and of family organisations, in this process of spiritual discernment.

“Synodality is a call for mutual listening between all the members of the Church, and inspired by the Holy Spirit. Encouraged by the opening of the Synod, family associations wish to become protagonists of the synodal movement initiated by Pope Francis. In the same way that family members care for each other and move forward in a common understanding of unity, family associations wish today to work within the Church to create a true path of unity and communion for the common good.”, said Vincenzo Bassi of FAFCE.

He added: “This webinar is a way that FAFCE and Family Solidarity have to raise awareness about the responsibility that Christians and, specifically, our organisations have in this goal in the first instance, by working to create a network of encounters between families and by developing Family Associations. In fact, as Pope Francis said at the opening of the synodal path, “As we initiate this process, we too are called to become experts in the art of encounter. Not so much by organizing events or theorizing about problems, as in taking time to encounter the Lord and one another“.”

The webinar will take place on Thursday 9th December at 7.00 pm (Irish time) and it will be moderated by journalist Jason Osborne (Irish Catholic). Dr Angelo Bottone, chairman of Family Solidarity, will make the closing remarks.

The event will be livestreamed on the FAFCE Youtube and Facebook pages.

For ZOOM registration and more details, see https://familysolidarity.org/synodality/



 

Pope Compares EU to Communist and Nazi Dictatorships

Pope Francis launched a stunning rebuke of the European Union’s recent discriminatory attitudes towards Christianity.

In a recent communique from the EU, its ‘Commissioner for Equality’ Helena Dalli, had instructed her staff not to wish one another a ‘Happy Christmas’.

This came despite Dalli regularly wishing people a ‘Happy Eid’ in celebration of the Islamic festival.

After a backlash at the bigoted suggestions, Dalli withdrew them, but stopped short of apologising.

Now, in his pre flight press conference on the way back from Greece, Pope Francis has spoken out strongly against the aggressive suggestions from Ms. Dalli and from the European Union.

He compared her initiative to the worst excesses of Communism and other secular leaderships like Nazism and Napoleon.

Pope Francis stated:

You refer to the European Union document on Christmas... this is an anachronism. In history many, many dictatorships have tried to do so. Think of Napoleon: from there... Think of the Nazi dictatorship, the communist one... it is a fashion of a watered-down secularism, distilled water... But this is something that throughout hasn’t worked.

But this makes me think of something, talking about the European Union, which I believe is necessary: the European Union must take in hand the ideals of the founding fathers, which were ideals of unity, of greatness, and be careful not to take the path of ideological colonisation. This could end up dividing the countries and [causing] the European Union to fail. The European Union must respect each country as it is structured within, the variety of countries, and not want to make them uniform. I don't think it will do that, it wasn't its intention, but be careful, because sometimes they come, and they throw projects like this one out there and they don't know what to do; I don't know what comes to mind... No, each country has its own peculiarity, but each country is open to the others. The European Union: its sovereignty, the sovereignty of brothers in a unity that respects the individuality of each country. And be careful not to be vehicles of ideological colonisation. That is why [the issue] of Christmas is an anachronism.

The European Union caused further distress to Catholics this past week when one of its ambassadors mocked Our Lady by dressing up as here with a beard, suggesting that she may well have had one.

The EU is yet to apologise for that offensive gesture either.

Irish Men's Rosary Draws Huge Crowds Again

Although there are many in the Irish church who prefer to mourn the loss of faith among many, there are others who are willing to do far more than merely ‘manage the decline’ of the faith in Ireland.

One prominent example of those unwilling to merely allow the faith to disappear with the next generation has been evident in the successful men’s Rosary Rallies of recent months.

Following on from the successes of similar events in Poland, Irish Catholics have drawn hundred to events in Derry and Newry and now they have brought their biggest one yet with yesterday’s rally in Belfast.

On Facebook, Męski Różaniec Święty w Irlandii (Men’s Holy Rosary Ireland) wrote:

Another Public Male Holy Rosary behind us and what a huge success. We started the day with a Mass in Classic Roman Rhythm (Trydenck) at The Church of the Immaculate Heart of Mary ICKSP. Today we were in the very centre of Belfast, where together with the rest of the Irish we prayed the rosary in the intention of rewarding the Immaculate Heart of Mary

With a repentance :

- For all the ways the Irish nation has turned away from the Gospel and the teaching of the Catholic Church

- for the sins of abortion, birth control and all forms of impurity.

In His mercy we ask:

- the end of covid virus

- The end of the signs of growing tyranny on our nation

- Restoring our nation back to God.

Another Men's Rosary will be held in Armagh, Main Square, Market Street next to the library

January 1, 2022 at 1pm

The next event on New Year’s Day in Armagh is sure to draw large crowds again. It shames the naysayers and prophets of doom to see such a positive event, drawing men onto to the streets to publicly and boldly proclaim their love of the Most Holy Rosary of The Blessed Virgin Mary.

We pray that this idea may be adopted by others in parts of Ireland and play its part in reviving the faith across the island.

EU Ambassador Says Virgin Mary 'Had Beard'

The increasingly fraught relationship between Christians and the European Union hit new lows in recent weeks.

Firstly, there were calls to remove the term ‘Happy Christmas’ from official documentation, per a request from an EU Minister.

Now, a European Union Ambassador has claimed that Our Lady had a beard, while mocking Catholics with a deliberately offensive photoshoot where he dressed up as Our Lady.

The photoshoot was taken for German magazine Siegessäule, who went out of their way to offend Christians during Advent with the deliberately blasphemous set of pictures.

Earlier this year, Riccardo Simonetti was made an LGBTQ Goodwill Ambassador for the European Parliament. Sharing the images on his social media, he wrote:

If we ignore the fact that Jesus wasn’t white, we could as well believe the Virgin Mary had a beard, why not? 🧔‍♀️

The shocking images and lack of reaction stand as yet another example of the European Union’s soft stance on anti Christian sentiments within its ranks.

There has been strong condemnation of the provocative attacks, with one MEP calling for Simonetti to be removed from his ambassador position.

Jorge Buxadé of the VOX party, has demanded that the EU removes him from his ambassador role.

You can read their open letter to the EU below: