2021: A Bleak Year For the Irish Unborn

Just three years ago, On New Year’s Day 2019, abortion on demand became legal after the deletion of the RIGHT TO LIFE, contained in the 8th Amendment of our Irish constitution.
Three years later, we gather to remember those unborn boys and girls who have been aborted since REPEAL. According to The Irish abortion clock, almost 20 thousand unborn children have lost their lives since REPEAL.

According to www.irishabortionclock.com, almost 20,000 unborn children have been aborted since the introduction of laws allowing elective abortions in Ireland.

Today, we will be laying 100 white crosses to represent those children’s lives. Our brothers, sisters, nephews, nieces, cousins, sons and daughters.

As we lay each White Cross, please remember that each single cross represents 200 lost lives. Some unwanted, some disabled, some wanted but aborted for social or economic reasons.

As we lay each White Cross, please remember the mothers and fathers who suffer the loss of their child and those parents who regret the abortion of their child.

Last Year, pro-abortion political parties and abortion organisations started calling for a start to the promised Three Year Review of abortion legislation. These groups don’t want to reduce abortion by providing a child friendly environment, they want MORE child abortions. These groups use words like “Reproductive Rights” and “pro-choice” to market more abortions in Ireland.

We have been told that this Three year Review will be held independently of Government, but the Pro Life Campaign has reported that the Minister for Health is approaching the abortion review with a view to “radically expanding” abortions in Ireland.

Ms Eilis Mulroy of the Prolife Campaign said that the minister’s “one-sided” approach means the review could be a “cold house” for those who hold a pro-life viewpoint.

The main campaign by the pro-choice activists during this review is to have the 3 day reflection period removed. These abortion activists think it’s a bad idea to have expectant mothers reflect on aborting their child. However, Gript News reported that this 3 day reflection period led to an estimated 870 expectant mothers changing their minds and not carrying out an abortion in 2019. Yet, the abortion activists want to remove this life saving process?

As we stand here today, In Ireland, there is a major legal and media push to implement exclusion zones around premises where abortion doctors carry out child abortions. Any future legislation will make criminals of any participants who hold peaceful vigils outside premises committing abortions.

Organisations such as Together for Safety, Abortion Rights Campaign, political parties such as Fine Gael, Labour, People before Profit, Green Party, Sinn Fein and Fianna Fáil all want exclusion zones around premises where abortions and performed.

These groups tell us that it’s to protect the rights of mothers. They tell us that prolife people who take part in prolife vigils intimidate and harass mothers entering abortion premises.

Their allegations against prolife people go unchallenged in the Dáil and in the mainstream, mostly pro abortion media.

However allegations by pro abortion politicians, media organisations and the reasons given to introduce legislation to ban prolife vigils near abortion premises do not stack up to scrutiny.

Back in September 2019, GRIPT.ie reported

“The (Garda) Commissioner confirmed his “satisfaction with existing public order legislation to adequately deal with any reasonable public order incident that may arise at such centres. I re-confirm my views expressed at our recent meeting that protests to date at such centres have not contravened the law and are peaceful.”

There was “no evidence to suggest that there is threatening, abusive or insulting behaviour directed towards persons utilising those services,” the Commissioner added in his letter to the Minister for Health.

More recently in December 2021 Limerick Hospital joined the exclusion zone debate saying “The UL (University Hospital) Hospitals Group has said it is has not received any complaints from patients or their families or staff relating to safe access to University Maternity Hospital Limerick, despite a number of politicians calling for a “safe access zone” to be organised at the hospital claiming anti-abortion protestors have regularly been intimidating patients going in and out of the hospital throughout 2021 reported the Limerick Post.

Yet, for the first time in modern Irish history, a minority group will be banned from peaceful protest near the vicinity of abortion premises.

The minority pro-life community will be censored and criminalised. Imagine the backlash if the minority LGBT parades were targeted and banned.

In pro-life countries like Hungary, their government encourages couples and families. Hungarians are encouraged to marry, have children and receive financial supports and housing. The Hungarian parliament has a minister for the Family, not just a minister for Children like we have here in Ireland. All legislation implemented in Hungary goes through a rigorous analysis to measure the positive and negative impacts on Families living in Hungary

That’s the opposite to what our government do here in Ireland. In some ways, families are discouraged. The lack of affordable Housing for couples looking to start a family being one blatant anti-family policy. Another is the tax position for mothers who choose to stay at home to have a family.

Also in 2021, some brave Irish politicians in the Life and dignity Group drafted a Bill to provide pain relief for the unborn child in certain cases of abortion.

The first stage of the Bill stated the following;

“The infliction of unnecessary or avoidable pain on human beings, especially those with no capacity to resist, is something that all compassionate societies should seek to avoid.”

“Thankfully, in most areas of modern medicine, this principle is routinely adopted in practice.”

“This is why medical ethics require that surgical procedures, both routine and major, are carried out with the use of anaesthetics and analgesics, except in extreme circumstances where this is not possible.”

“These values also inform our attitudes to the treatment of animals. Under the Animal Health and Welfare Act 2013, vets and farmers are required to use anaesthetics when carrying out any procedure on an animal.”

The Foetal Pain Relief Bill was debated in December 2021 and we had Deputy Holly Cairns, a TD in the Social Democrats Party tweeted:

"The 'Foetal Pain Relief' Bill is an attempt to drag us backwards.

The women of Ireland who have had to endure patriarchal control for generations, will not put up with it.

The days of middle-aged men trying to control the bodies of young women are over."

The Bill was supported by two Waterford TD’s Independent TD, Matt Shanahan and Fianna Fails TD and Minister Mary Butler. We thank both of these Deputies for their compassionate support.

We also invited all Waterford TD’s and County councillors to this White Cross Memorial today.

We received email acknowledgments from Deputies Mary Butler, Matt Shanahan and David Cullinane.

As of last week, we received no responses from any Waterford based county councillors.

We are saddened that child abortion is now a political football used to gain votes for liberal politicians.

2021 also saw the launch of the International Prolife Flag. This is a major positive move for prolife advocates around the world. We finally have a universal symbol we can rally around and increase our voice.

Today, is the first time we will unfurl the new Prolife flag in Waterford.

On behalf of DeiseForLife, Thank you all for attending and participating and keeping the Prolife message alive in our communities, workplaces and homes.

May you all have a Happy and Peaceful 2022.

The Deise4Life Committee

Top 10 Catholic Images of 2021

2021 was a strange year for Catholicism.

The Latin Mass was suppressed, every Sacrament was suppressed for much of the year here in Ireland (even as government officials jetted around the world) and yet, there were many scenes of Catholics proudly defending their churches from secular attacks.

Here are 10 images that defined the year.

10. Pope Francis sitting in the ruins of Mosul, Iraq.

The city was home to the worst of the persecutions and crucifixions by ISIS, after the illegal war of the UK and the USA unleashed hell for Christians in the Middle East. 81% of Christians in Iraq were killed or expelled because of the results of the war crimes of the UK and USA.

9. Myanmar nun calls for end to violence.

This image went viral in 2021 as a Catholic nun begged police and soldiers to stop targeting civilians in Myanmar.

8. Sydney Catholic Defend Church.

St. Mary’s Cathedral was home to a deliberate attack on the Catholic faith earlier this year, with an anti Catholic concert scheduled for outside its grounds. A number of Catholics rallied to defend the beautiful building and successfully repelled any would be attackers.

7. Mass Rock

The Franciscan Friars of the Renewal were among a number of Irish priests who answered the unjust persecution of the Globalist government with a return to Ireland’s Mass Rocks, where the faith was said in secret for centuries.

6. Irish Men’s Rosary Rally

Newry was one of a number of locations where Irish men drew large crowds at Rosary Rallies.

5. Irish State Stages Siege Against Mass

Fr. PJ Hughes had his whole village swarmed by Gardai in order to stop individuals from attending Mass, even as government officials partied hard into the long hours to celebrate Ireland being named on the UN Security Council. An interesting anecdote is that one local newspaper published this story, right beside the curious republishing of an historic article celebrating Freemasonry in the town.

The image sent shockwaves throughout the world, with the rest of the world marvelling at the deep seethed hatred for the Catholic faith that was held by the Irish government.

4. French police watch Nanterre church.

After a procession was attacked with priests spat on and threats of beheadings, this church in Nanterre was among many watched by police and soldiers in France in December as the once great country continued to come apart at the seems.

3. Locked out Irish Catholics Pray Outside Church

As the Irish government worked hard to clamp down on the worship of Catholics in 2021, not everyone took it lying down. With thousands eventually lining up outside their churches each Sunday to pray when they were barred from Mass.

2. Latin Mass Pilgrimage in Rome

Despite bullying from a number of clerics and Anglo-American commentators, huge numbers travelled to Rome for the Summorum Pontificum pilgrimage once more this year.

  1. Gardai STORM Latin Mass in Athlone.

Garda Commissioner Drew Harris, who is a Northern Irish Protestant, came under severe criticism for this devastating attack on the faith, when his force dared to enter the sanctuary of the Catholic faith. It was a disgusting mistake, which the Garda Commissioner has still refused to publicly apologise for.

On God Becoming Man

During the Christmas season, I am always reminded of how God came down to Earth and became man like us, and for us.

This truth is scandalous to some religions, but a beautiful and powerful one to us Christians. A being, not just any being, but the infinite one, creator of heaven and earth, God Himself, lovingly and willingly made himself known to us by making himself small and fragile - a baby, just like how all of us once were.

The King of the Universe allowed Himself to be born in an insignificant town, in a poor manger, as a fragile little baby of two poor parents. I have never seen any other religion with a God like this, and this really begs some awe, admiration, contemplation, and praise.

Other religions and spiritual systems always speak of how man reaches up to an infinite and supreme being, but it is only in Christianity where God reaches down to man. With other gods and religions, you always see how it’s man having to pray a certain amount of times, or not eating a certain type of food, or having to go to some special place in order to pile up efforts in the hopes of being able to reach God one day.

But not with our God!

Our God came down first and made Himself known to us. Because of that, we live out our faith because of love for Him and not just because we are trying to reach Him. God has already extended His hand towards us, and He waits for us to either say yes or no. The only action He requires is for us to reach back towards his hand and grab it. - To love Him back because He first loved us.

Do not think that our going to mass to fulfill obligations, lenten fasts, and Friday penances are done just out of the spirit of “having to do them.” If we feel like we just have to do them without an ounce of love for the One we are doing it for, then we have reduced ourselves into being one of the pagans. God is already within reach. He already took care of that part for us! There is nothing else we should do in order to reach Him because He is already here.

All we have to do is simply have faith, say yes, and reach back for His hand.

Stevie Rojas

Follow Stevie on Twitter Stevie Rojas J.M.J (@steviesrojas) / Twitter

See more of his writings at stevierojas.com

Newsweek Links BLM and Pro Aborts To Attacks on Catholic Churches

In 2020, Black Lives Matter leader and Protestant Pastor Shaun King put out the closest thing that that movement had to a fatwa. The target of his ire? The Catholic faith.

In frightening echoes of how Irish and other European Catholics were treated by the Ku Klux Klan and other Anglo Protestant groups, King unleashed his frightening tirade on social media, writing:

Yes, I think the statues of the white European they claim is Jesus should also come down.

They are a form of white supremacy.

Always have been.

In the Bible, when the family of Jesus wanted to hide, and blend in, guess where they went?

EGYPT!

Not Denmark.

Tear them down.

In a brave article, Newsweek have pointed out the absurd nature of the BLM movement’s antipathy towards the Catholic faith:

In 2019, before the societal breakdown that happened with the start of the pandemic and the Black Lives Matter riots in the first half of 2020, 37 cases of vandalism or arson on Catholic property were reported to the FBI, according to the National Catholic Register. This was about the same amount as anti-Muslim vandalism (31 cases) but minuscule compared with antisemitic vandalism (684 cases).

All this changed in May 2020, when demonstrators protesting the death of George Floyd went after Catholic churches, such as Our Lady of Mount Lebanon–St. Peter Cathedral in Los Angeles, defacing it with graffiti that said, "Make America pay for its crimes against black lives." They also tore down statues of St. Junípero Serra.

During an orgy of violence in the second week of July, multiple Catholic sites across the country were hit, including an arson-related fire that destroyed much of the interior of the 249-year-old Mission San Gabriel Arcángel in San Gabriel, California. In October, protestors pulled down and defaced a statue of Serra at the nearby Mission San Rafael Arcángel, a move that infuriated San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone, who called for the perpetrators to be punished to deter others from defacing Catholic property.

Commenting on the article, Thomas Reese SJ claims that ‘What we have here is not so much anti-Catholicism as anti-clericalism’, which seems strange given the attacks on statues of Our Lady.

The article then states that abortion is the most common reason for attacks on churches.

It then points out that the current violence against Catholics in the United States is not dissimilar from the treatment of Jews prior to the Holocaust:

Some worry that increased vandalism of a religious group unused to such treatment is the first sign of a society ripping apart at the seams. Before German Jews got shipped off to concentration camps, there was the infamous Kristallnacht on November 9-10, 1938, when Nazi thugs, aided by civilians, destroyed or ransacked some 7,000 Jewish-owned businesses, along with hospitals, schools, homes and synagogues.

Two very important things are then pointed out:

  • The reluctance of mainstream media to cover the violence

  • The fact that most violence is taking place in states controlled by the Democratic Party

It compares this situation to France, where Catholics had to attend religious services under armed protection this Christmas, after recent beheadings and attacks on processions.

Christianity is the most persecuted religion in the world, because it is the most true, there is no reason to think that this persecution should be geographically confined.

Arson, Graffiti and More: Vandals Increasingly Target Catholic Churches (newsweek.com)

Irish Times Praises Frank Duff But Gets One Thing Wrong

Such was the great work of Legion of Mary founder Frank Duff that now even The Irish Times has praised his contribution to Irish society in the early Twentieth Century.

Although the clumsy headline 'Mother and Baby Home Controversy Overshadows Work of Frank Duff’ appears to bizarrely suggest that Frank Duff has been dragged into debates over Mother and Baby Homes, the rest of the article by Paddy Murray is surprisingly quite honest and fair.

Murray’s article starts brightly by mentioning that the Legion’s Centenary deserves more media coverage in Ireland, owing to its 10 million members around the world.

He then refers to the Regina Coeli Hostel, by stating that the Legion of Mary, ‘was behind the establishment of a Mother and Haby home in central Dublin’. The Regina Coeli

The opening line of the Irish Government’s Mother and Baby Home Report recently stated:

Regina Coeli was not a conventional mother and baby home.

The report also states:

There is no indication that Regina Coeli was originally planned as a mother and baby home.

And also:

The arguments against establishing large mother and baby homes did not receive serious consideration, and the only institution that came close to providing a hostel where mothers could work and keep their child was Regina Coeli, which was run by the Legion of Mary

It is universally recognised that the Legion of Mary established a system that was very different to the mainstream concept of ‘Mother and Baby Homes’ (as inherited from the Anglo Protestant system that preceded the Irish State. It is also universally recognised that it was a far more visibly Catholic manifestation of how women and children should be treated than those run by the government.

Not only were the Mother and Baby Homes not uniquely Irish, but they were in fact British, having been recommended and initiated under British rule. As the Commission reports:

Mother and baby homes were not an Irish solution to an Irish problem; Ireland was late in establishing mother and baby homes and the initial recommendation in favour of these special homes came from the 1906 Vice-Regal Commission on the Irish Poor Law.

Proposals for establishing special mother and baby homes emerged as part of a wider review of the Irish poor law that was initiated when Ireland was part of the United Kingdom.

Duff’s kindness and proactive approaches were Irish solutions to Irish problems, indeed, Catholic solutions.

Murray’s article rightly points out:

Duff believed that mothers and their babies should be together and not separated. It wasn’t a popular opinion in 1930 when he established the home.

The article also gives a fine example from Gordon Lewis, who was raised in the hostel and who says he greatly admires Duff for his work and for the difference that he made to his life and to others.

Yet, there can be no getting away from the bizarre claim of the headline that Duff’s work has been somehow ‘overshadowed by mother and baby home controversy’.

It simply has not.

Duff’s work has been ignored for the opposite reason, because his kindness, compassion and deep faith are an affront to Angela’s Ashes revisionism that claims all Irish people lived miserable and unhappy lives until Leo Varadkar led them in a celebration of abortion in Dublin Castle in 2018.

There are at least 10 million people around the world who know and appreciate the greatness of Duff on a weekly basis, it would be wonderful if the Legion of Mary were better understood and more appreciated in their home country, but some things are more important than the praise of others and a sign of a prophet is being left unappreciated in their hometown.

It is a positive thing that Legion of Mary has not sought the approval of the Irish mainstream media during this Centenary Year, it should instead continue its mission in helping those seeking material need, the homeless, sick and destitute as well as those in spiritual need, those who have lost their faith or who need to return to prayer.

Leaders Criticise 'Systematic Attempt' To Drive Christians from Holy Land

In a powerful statement , Christian leaders in the Holy Land have heavily criticised increasing violence against their people in the region.

The hard hitting message criticised ‘frequent and sustained attacks by fringe radical groups’. This included attacks at Easter at the Mount of Olives and elsewhere. They then mentioned Holy Sites being ‘regularly vandalised and desecrated’. This, they said, was part of a ‘systematic attempt to drive the Christian community out of Jerusalem and other parts of the Holy Land’.

The statement also pointed out that the Israeli government had failed to stop those who ‘regularly initimidate local Christians, assault priests and clergy, and desecrate Holy Sites and church properties’.

Worryingly, they stated that although the Jewish Quarter had special protection under law, there was no such protections for the Christian areas of the city. They pointed out that these ‘radical groups’ were not acquiring ‘strategic property in the Christian Quarter, with the aim of diminishing the Christian presence, often using underhanded dealings and intimidation tactics to evict residents from their homes, dramatically decreasing the Christian presence and further disrupting the historic pilgrim routes between Bethlehem and Jerusalem’.

They made a call for dialogue with an aim to establishing two things:

  • To deal with radical ultra Jewish violence against Christians

  • To ensure the maintenance and safety of the presence of the Christian Quarter and its heritage

The Spokesperson for the Israeli Ministry for Foreign Affairs called the claims ‘baseless’.

Lior Haiat stated that the Christian community in Israel is growing, which is true overall, but in East Jerusalem they are not, this is what the church leaders were trying to address. He then called the message ‘infuriating’ and warned that it ‘could lead to violence and bring harm to innocent people’.

Many of the attacks that the Christian leaders were referring to have been led by Bentzi Gopshtain and his organisation Lehava. Lehava are opposed to allowing anyone other than Israeli Jews to be allowed to assimilated within Jerusalem and surround regions. In 2015, the church filed an official complaint against Lehava after he appeared to call for Catholic churches to be burnt to the ground, stating:

The law is straightforward: Maimonides’ interpretation is that one must burn idolatry. There’s not a single rabbi that would deliberate that fact. I expect the government of Israel to carry that out

In 2015, they organised a violent protest against a Christian event at an Armenian Church in the city.

Israeli settlers have also regularly been caught on CCTV spitting on the Armenian Church in Jerusalem.

The Armenian Christian community have repeatedly been victims of these targets, once having to report of constant spitting being sent in their direction.

Last Christmas, it was the church at Gethsemene which faced an arson attack from these extremists.

One Jewish media outlet, JWire responded to the calls by Christian leaders by stating that it was an:

anti-Israel political ploy that should be rejected by Israel.

They also published this cartoon that criticised the Christian leaders and referred to them as ‘weasles’.

St. Joseph and the Holy Family by Garrigou Lagrange

On this Feast of the Holy Family, we present Reginald Garrigou Lagrange OP’s reflection on the Holy Family and on the role of Saint Joseph within it.

We also publish this by means of response to an article in the National Catholic Reporter which referred to Our Lady as a ‘single mom’ and which stated ‘Jesus is the son of Mary, not Joseph’. It also states ‘we have an elaborate and painstaking genealogy created to prove Jesus' ancestral links to the male kings and patriarchs of Israel when in fact, as verse 19 explains, he was born to Mary through the power of the Holy Spirit. Not through Joseph. Not through patriarchal potency. It is enough to make any self-respecting feminist laugh’.

In the essay below, Garrigou Lagrange refutes this by pointing out the special nature of Joseph’s mission:

those whom God Himself chooses directly and immediately to be His exceptional ministers in the work of redemption receive from Him grace proportionate to their vocation. This was the case with St. Joseph. He must have received a relative fulness of grace proportionate to his mission since he was chosen not by men nor by any creature but by God Himself and by God alone to fulfil a mission unique in the world. We cannot say at what precise moment St. Joseph’s sanctification took place. But we can say that, from the time of his marriage to Our Lady, he was confirmed in grace, because of his special mission.

THE PREDESTINATION OF ST. JOSEPH AND HIS EMINENT SANCTITY

He that is lesser among you all, he is the greater.”
—Luke 9:48

One cannot write a book on Our Lady without referring to the predestination of St. Joseph, his eminent perfection, the character of his special mission, his virtues, and his role in the sanctification of souls.

HIS PRE-EMINENCE OVER THE OTHER SAINTS

The opinion that St. Joseph is the greatest of the saints after Our Lady is one which is becoming daily more commonly held in the Church. We do not hesitate to look on the humble carpenter as higher in grace and eternal glory than the patriarchs and the greatest of the prophets—than St. John the Baptist, the apostles, the martyrs and the great doctors of the Church. He who is least in the depth of his humility is, because of the interconnection of the virtues, the greatest in the height of his charity: “He that is the lesser among you all, he is the greater.”

St. Joseph’s pre-eminence was taught by Gerson and St. Bernardine of Siena. It became more and more common in the course of the 16th century. It was admitted by St. Teresa, by the Dominican Isidore de Isolanis, who appears to have written the first treatise on St. Joseph, by St. Francis de Sales, by Suarez, and later by St. Alphonsus Liguori, Ch. Sauve, Cardinal Lepicier and Mgr Sinibaldi; it is very ably treated of in the article “Joseph” in the Diet, de Theol. Cath. by M. A. Michel.

The doctrine of St. Joseph’s pre-eminence received the approval of Leo XIII in his encyclical Quamquam pluries, August 15th, 1899, written to proclaim St. Joseph patron of the universal Church. “The dignity of the Mother of God is so elevated that there can be no higher created one. But since St. Joseph was united to the Blessed Virgin by the conjugal bond, there is no doubt that he approached nearer than any other to that super-eminent dignity of hers by which the Mother of God surpasses all created natures. Conjugal union is the greatest of all; by its very nature it is accompanied by a reciprocal communication of the goods of the spouses. If then God gave St. Joseph to Mary to be her spouse He certainly did not give him merely as a companion in life, a witness of her virginity, a guardian of her honor, but He made him also participate by the conjugal bond in the eminent dignity which was hers.” When Leo XIII said that Joseph came nearest of all to the super-eminent dignity of Mary, did his words imply that Joseph is higher in glory than all the angels? We cannot give any certain answer to the question. We must be content to restate the doctrine which is becoming more and more commonly taught: of all the saints Joseph is the highest after Jesus and Mary; he is among the angels and the archangels. The Church mentions him immediately after Mary and before the Apostles in the prayer A cunctis. Though he is not mentioned in the Canon of the Mass, he has a proper preface, and the month of March is consecrated to him as protector and defender of the universal Church.

The multitude of Christians in all succeeding generations are committed to him in a real though hidden manner. This idea is expressed in the litanies approved by the Church: ‘St. Joseph, illustrious descendant of David, light of the Patriarchs, Spouse of the Mother of God, guardian of her virginity, foster-father of the Son of God, vigilant defender of Christ, head of the Holy Family; Joseph most just, most chaste, most prudent, most strong, most obedient, most faithful, mirror of patience, lover of poverty, model of workers, glory of domestic life, guardian of virgins, support of families, consolation of the afflicted, hope of the sick, patron of the dying, terror of demons, protector of the Holy Church.” He is the greatest after Mary.

THE REASON FOR ST. JOSEPH’S PRE-EMINENCE

What is the justification of this doctrine which has been more and more accepted in the course of five centuries? The principle invoked more or less explicitly by St. Bernard, St. Bernardine of Siena, Isidore de Isolanis, Suarez, and more recent authors is the one, simple and sublime, formulated by St. Thomas when treating of the fulness of grace in Jesus and of holiness in Mary: “An exceptional divine mission calls for a corresponding degree of grace.” This principle explains why the holy soul of Jesus, being united personally to the Word, the Source of all grace, received the absolute fulness of grace. It explains also why Mary, called to be Mother of God, received from the instant of her conception an initial fulness of grace which was greater than the initial fulness of all the saints together: since she was nearer than any other to the Source of grace she drew grace more abundantly. It explains also why the Apostles who were nearer to Our Blessed Lord than the saints who followed them had more perfect knowledge of the mysteries of faith. To preach the gospel infallibly to the world they received at Pentecost the gift of a most eminent, most enlightened, and most firm faith as the principle of their apostolate.

The same truth explains St. Joseph’s pre-eminence. To understand it we must add one remark: all works which are to be referred immediately to God Himself are perfect. The work of creation, for example, which proceeded entirely and directly from the hand of God was perfect. The same must be said of His great servants, whom He has chosen exceptionally and immediately—not through a human instrument—to restore the order disturbed by sin. God does not choose as men do. Men often choose incompetent officials for the highest posts. But those whom God Himself chooses directly and immediately to be His exceptional ministers in the work of redemption receive from Him grace proportionate to their vocation. This was the case with St. Joseph. He must have received a relative fulness of grace proportionate to his mission since he was chosen not by men nor by any creature but by God Himself and by God alone to fulfil a mission unique in the world. We cannot say at what precise moment St. Joseph’s sanctification took place. But we can say that, from the time of his marriage to Our Lady, he was confirmed in grace, because of his special mission.

TO WHAT ORDER DOES ST. JOSEPH’S EXCEPTIONAL MISSION BELONG?

St. Joseph’s mission is evidently higher than the order of nature—even by angelic nature. But is it simply of the order of grace, as were that of St. John the Baptist who prepared the way of salvation, and that the Apostles had in the Church for the sanctification of souls, and that more particular mission of the founders of religious orders? If we examine the question carefully we shall see that St. Joseph’s mission surpassed the order of grace. It borders, by its term, on the hypostatic order, which is constituted by the mystery of the Incarnation. But it is necessary to avoid both exaggeration and understatement in this matter.

Mary’s unique mission, her divine motherhood, has its term in the hypostatic order. So also, in a sense, St. Joseph’s hidden mission. This is the teaching of many saints and other writers. St. Bernard says of St. Joseph: “He is the faithful and prudent servant whom the Lord made the support of His Mother, the foster-father of His flesh, and the sole most faithful co-operator on earth in His great design.”

St. Bernardine of Siena writes: “When God chooses a person by grace for a very elevated mission, He gives all the graces required for it. This is verified in a specially outstanding manner in the case of St. Joseph, Foster-father of Our Lord Jesus Christ and Spouse of Mary . . .” Isidore de Isolanis places St. Joseph’s vocation above that of the Apostles. He remarks that the vocation of the apostles is to preach the gospel, to enlighten souls, to reconcile them with God, but that the vocation of St. Joseph is more immediately in relation with Christ Himself since he is the Spouse of the Mother of God, the Foster-father and Protector of the Saviour. Suarez teaches to the same effect: “Certain offices pertain to the order of sanctifying grace, and among them that of the apostles holds the highest place; thus they have need of more gratuitous gifts than other souls, especially gratuitous gifts of wisdom. But there are other offices which touch upon or border on the order of the Hypostatic Union . . . as can be seen clearly in the case of the divine maternity of the Blessed Virgin, and it is to that order that the ministry of St. Joseph pertains.”

Some years ago Mgr Sinibaldi, titular Bishop of Tiberias and secretary of the Sacred Congregation of Studies, treated the question very ably. He pointed out that the ministry of St. Joseph belonged, in a sense, because of its term, to the hypostatic order: not that St. Joseph co-operated intrinsically as physical instrument of the Holy Ghost in the realization of the mystery of the Incarnation—for under that respect his role is very much inferior to that of Mary—but that he was predestined to be, in the order of moral causes, the protector of the virginity and the honor of Mary at the same time as foster-father and protector of the Word made flesh. “His mission pertains by its term to the hypostatic order, not through intrinsic physical and immediate cooperation, but through extrinsic moral and mediate (through Mary) co-operation, which is, however, really and truly co-operation.”

ST. JOSEPH’S PREDESTINATION IS ONE WITH THE DECREE OF THE INCARNATION

St. Joseph’s pre-eminence becomes all the clearer if we consider that the eternal decree of the Incarnation covered not merely the Incarnation in abstraction from circumstances of time and place but the Incarnation here and now—that is to say, the Incarnation of the Son of God who by the operation of the Holy Ghost was to be conceived at a certain moment of time by the Virgin Mary, espoused to a man of the family of David whose name was Joseph: “The angel Gabriel was sent from God into a city of Galilee, called Nazareth, to a virgin espoused to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David.” (Luke 1:26–27).

All the indications are therefore that St. Joseph was predestined to be foster-father of the Incarnate Word before being predestined to glory; the ultimate reason being that Christ’s predestination as man to the natural divine sonship precedes the predestination of all the elect, since Christ is the first of the predestined. The predestination of Christ to the natural divine sonship is simply the decree of the Incarnation, which, as we have seen, includes Mary’s predestination to the divine motherhood and Joseph’s to be foster-father and protector of the Incarnate Son of God.

As the predestination of Christ to the natural divine sonship is superior to His predestination to glory and precedes it, and as the predestination of Mary to the divine motherhood precedes (in signo priori) her predestination to glory, so also the predestination of St. Joseph to be foster-father of the Incarnate Word precedes his predestination to glory and to grace. In other words, the reason why he was predestined to the highest degree of glory after Mary, and in consequence to the highest degree of grace and of charity, is that he was called to be the worthy foster-father and protector of the Man-God.

The fact that St. Joseph’s first predestination was one with the decree of the Incarnation shows how elevated his unique mission was. This is what people mean when they say that St. Joseph was made and put into the world to be the foster-father of the Incarnate Word and that God willed for him a high degree of glory and grace to fit him for his task.

THE SPECIAL CHARACTER OF ST. JOSEPH’S MISSION

This point is explained admirably by Bossuet in his first panegyric of the saint: “Among the different vocations, I notice two in the Scriptures which seem directly opposed to each other: the first is that of the Apostles, the second that of St. Joseph. Jesus was revealed to the Apostles that they might announce Him throughout the world; He was revealed to St. Joseph who was to remain silent and keep Him hidden. The Apostles are lights to make the world see Jesus. Joseph is a veil to cover Him; and under that mysterious veil are hidden from us the virginity of Mary and the greatness of the Saviour of souls . . . He who makes the Apostles glorious with the glory of preaching, glorifies Joseph by the humility of silence.” The hour for the manifestation of the mystery of the Incarnation had not yet struck: it was to be preceded by the thirty years of the hidden life.

Perfection consists in doing God’s will, each one according to his vocation; St. Joseph’s vocation of silence and obscurity surpassed that of the Apostles because it bordered more nearly on the redemptive Incarnation. After Mary, Joseph was nearest to the Author of grace, and in the silence of Bethlehem, during the exile in Egypt, and in the little home of Nazareth he received more graces than any other saint.

His mission was a dual one.

As regards Mary, he preserved her virginity by contracting with her a true but altogether holy marriage. The angel of the Lord said to him: “Joseph, son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife, for that which is conceived of her is of the Holy Ghost.” (Matt. 1:20; Luke 2:5). Mary is truly his wife. The marriage was a true one, as St. Thomas explains (Ilia, q. 29, a. 2) when showing its appropriateness. There should be no room for doubt, however light, regarding the honor of the Son and the Mother: if ever doubt did arise Joseph, the most informed and the least suspect witness, would be there to defend it. Besides, Mary would find help and protection in St. Joseph. He loved her with a pure and devoted love, in God and for God. Their union was stainless, and most respectful on the side of St. Joseph. Thus he was nearer than any other saint to the Mother of God and the spiritual Mother of men—and he too was a man. The beauty of the whole universe was nothing compared with that of the union of Mary and Joseph, a union created by the Most High, which ravished the angels and gave joy to the Lord.

As regards the Incarnate Word, Joseph watched over Him, protected Him, and contributed to His human education. He is called His foster-father, but the term does not express fully the mysterious supernatural relation between the two. A man becomes foster-father of a child normally as a result of an accident. But it was no accident in the case of St. Joseph: he had been created and put into the world for that purpose: it was the primary reason of his predestination and the reason for all the graces he received. Bossuet expressed this well: “If nature does not give a father’s heart, where will it be found? In other words, since Joseph was not Jesus’ father, how could he have a father’s heart in His regard?

“Here we must recognise the action of God. It is by the power of God that Joseph has a father’s heart, and if nature fails God gives one with His own hand; for it is of God that it is written that He directs our inclinations where he wills. . . . He gives some a heart of flesh when He softens their nature by charity. . . . Does He not give all the faithful the hearts of children when He sends to them the Spirit of His Son? The Apostles feared the least danger, but God gave them a new heart and their courage became undaunted. . . . The same hand gave Joseph the heart of a father and Jesus the heart of a son. That is why Jesus obeys and Joseph does not fear to command. How has he the courage to command his Creator? Because the true Father of Jesus Christ, the God who gives Him birth from all eternity, having chosen Joseph to be the father of His only Son in time, sent down into his bosom some ray or some spark of His own infinite love for His Son; that is what changed his heart, that is what gave him a father’s love, and Joseph the just man who feels that father’s heart within him feels also that God wishes him to use his paternal authority, so that he dares to command Him who he knows is his Master.” That is equivalent to saying that Joseph was predestined first to take the place of a father in regard to the Saviour who could have no earthly father, and in consequence to have all the gifts which were given him that he might be a worthy Protector of the Incarnate Word.

Is it necessary to say with what fidelity St. Joseph guarded the triple deposit confided to him: the virginity of Mary, the Person of Jesus Christ, and the secret of the Eternal Father, that of the Incarnation of His Son, a secret to be guarded faithfully till the hour appointed for its revelation?

In a discourse delivered in the Consistorial Hall on the 19th of March, 1928, Pope Pius XI said, after having spoken on the missions of St. John the Baptist and St. Peter: “Between these two missions there appears that of St. Joseph, one of recollection and silence, one almost unnoticed and destined to be lit up only many centuries afterwards, a silence which would become a resounding hymn of glory, but only after many years. But where the mystery is deepest it is there precisely that the mission is highest and that a more brilliant cortege of virtues is required with their corresponding echo of merits. It was a unique and sublime mission, that of guarding the Son of God, the King of the world, that of protecting the virginity of Mary, that of entering into participation in the mystery hidden from the eyes of ages and so to co-operate in the Incarnation and the Redemption.” That is equivalently to state that Divine Providence conferred on St. Joseph all the graces he received in view of his special mission: in other words, St. Joseph was predestined first of all to be as a father to the Saviour, and was then predestined to the glory and the grace which were becoming in one favored with so exceptional a vocation.

THE VIRTUES AND GIFTS OF ST. JOSEPH

St. Joseph’s virtues are those especially of the hidden life, in a degree proportioned to that of his sanctifying grace: virginity, humility, poverty, patience, prudence, fidelity, simplicity, faith enlightened by the gifts of the Holy Ghost, confidence in God and perfect charity. He preserved what had been confided to him with a fidelity proportioned to its inestimable value.

Bossuet makes this general observation about the virtues of the hidden life: “It is a common failing of men to give themselves entirely to what is outside and to neglect what is within; to work for mere appearances and to neglect what is solid and lasting; to think often of the impression they make and little of what they ought to be. That is why the most highly esteemed virtues are those which concern the conduct and direction of affairs. The hidden virtues, on the contrary, which are practised away from the public view and under the eye of God alone, are not only neglected but hardly even heard of. And yet this is the secret of true virtue . . . a man must be built up interiorly in himself before he deserves to be given rank among others; and if this foundation is lacking, all the other virtues, however brilliant, will be mere display . . . they will not make the man according to God’s heart. Joseph sought God in simplicity; Joseph found God in detachment; Joseph enjoyed God’s company in obscurity.”

St. Joseph’s humility must have been increased by the thought of the gratuity of his exceptional vocation. He must have said to himself: why has the Most High given me, rather than any other man, His Son to watch over? Only because that was His good pleasure. Joseph was freely preferred from all eternity to all other men to whom the Lord could have given the same gifts and the same fidelity to prepare them for so exceptional a vocation. We see in St. Joseph’s predestination a reflection of the gratuitous predestination of Jesus and Mary. The knowledge of the value of the grace he received and of its absolute gratuitousness, far from injuring his humility, would strengthen it. He would think in his heart: “What have you that you have not received?”

Joseph appears the most humble of the saints after Mary—more humble than any of the angels. If he is the most humble he is by that fact the greatest, for the virtues are all connected and a person’s charity is as elevated as his humility is profound. “He that is lesser among you all, he is the greater.” (Luke 9:48).

Bossuet says well: “Though by an extraordinary grace of the Eternal Father he possessed the greatest treasure, it was far from Joseph’s thought to pride himself on his gifts or to make them known, but he hid himself as far as possible from mortal eyes, enjoying with God alone the mystery revealed to him and the infinite riches of which he was the custodian. Joseph has in his house what could attract the eyes of the whole world, and the world does not know him; he guards a God-Man, and breathes not a word of it; he is the witness of so great a mystery, and he tastes it in secret without divulging it abroad.”

His faith cannot be shaken in spite of the darkness of the unexpected mystery. The word of God communicated to him by the angel throws light on the virginal conception of the Saviour: Joseph might have hesitated to believe a thing so wonderful, but he believes it firmly in the simplicity of his heart. By his simplicity and his humility, he reaches up to divine heights.

Obscurity follows once more. Joseph was poor before receiving the secret of the Most High. He becomes still poorer when Jesus is born, for Jesus comes to separate men from everything so as to unite them to God. There is no room for the Saviour in the last of the inns of Bethlehem. Joseph must have suffered from having nothing to offer to Mary and her Son.

His confidence in God was made manifest in trials. Persecution came soon after Jesus’ birth. Herod tried to put Him to death, and the head of the Holy Family was forced to conceal the child, to take refuge in a distant country where he was unknown and where he did not know how he could earn a living. But he set out on the journey relying on Divine Providence.

His love of God and of souls did not cease to increase during the hidden life of Nazareth; the Incarnate Word is an unfailing source of graces, ever newer and more choice, for docile souls who oppose no obstacle to His action. We have said already, when speaking of Mary, that the progress of such docile souls is one of uniform acceleration, that is to say, they are carried all the more powerfully to God the nearer they approach Him. This law of spiritual gravitation was realized in Joseph; his charity grew up to the time of his death, and the progress of his latter years was more rapid than that of his earlier years, for finding himself nearer to God he was more powerfully drawn by Him.

Along with the theological virtues the gifts of the Holy Ghost, which are connected with charity, grew continuously. Those of understanding and of wisdom made his living faith more penetrating and more attuned to the divine. In a simple but most elevated way his contemplation rose to the infinite goodness of God. In its simplicity his contemplation was the most perfect after Mary’s.

His loving contemplation was sweet, but it demanded of him the most perfect spirit of abnegation and sacrifice when he recalled the words of Simeon: “This child will be . . . a sign that will be contradicted” and “Thy own soul a sword shall pierce.” He needed all his generosity to offer to God the Infant Jesus and His Mother Mary whom he loved incomparably more than himself. St. Joseph’s death was a privileged one; St. Francis de Sales writes that it was a death of love. The same holy doctor teaches with Suarez that St. Joseph was one of the saints who rose after the Resurrection of the Lord (Matt. 27:52 sqq.) and appeared in the city of Jerusalem; he holds also that these resurrections were definitive and that Joseph entered Heaven then, body and soul. St. Thomas is much more reserved regarding this point. Though his first opinion was that the resurrections were definitive he taught later, after an examination of St. Augustine’s arguments in the opposed sense, that this was not the case.

ST. JOSEPH’S ROLE IN THE SANCTIFICATION OF SOULS

The humble carpenter is glorified in Heaven to the extent to which he was hidden on earth. He to whom the Incarnate Word was subject has now an incomparable power of intercession. Leo XIII, in his encyclical Quamquam pluries finds in St. Joseph’s mission in regard to the Holy Family “the reasons why he is Patron and Protector of the universal Church. . . . Just as Mary, Mother of the Saviour, is spiritual mother of all Christians . . . Joseph looks on all Christians as having been confided to himself. . . . He is the defender of the Holy Church which is truly the house of God and the kingdom of God on earth.”

What strikes us most in St. Joseph’s role till the end of time is that there are united in it in an admirable way apparently opposed prerogatives. His influence is universal over the whole Church, and yet, like Divine Providence, it descends to the least details; “model of workmen,” he takes an interest in everyone who turns to him. He is the most universal of the saints, and yet he helps a poor man in his ordinary daily needs. His action is primarily of the spiritual order, and yet it extends to temporal affairs; he is the support of families and of communities, the hope of the sick. He watches over Christians of all conditions, of all countries, over fathers of families, husbands and wives, consecrated virgins; over the rich to inspire them to distribute their possessions charitably, and over the poor so as to help them. He is attentive to the needs of great sinners and of souls advanced in virtue. He is the patron of a happy death, of lost causes; he is terrible to the demon, and St. Teresa tells us that he is the guide of interior souls in the ways of prayer. His influence is a wonderful reflection of that of Divine Wisdom which “reacheth from end to end mightily, and ordereth all things sweetly.” (Wis. 8:1).

He has been clothed and will remain clothed in Divine splendor. Grace has become fruitful in him and he will share its fruit with all who strive to attain to the life which is “hid with Christ in God.” (Col. 3:3).

Pope Benedict XVI on the Peace of Christmas

The following is Pope Benedict XVI’s homily on the solemnity of the Nativity of Our Lord, Christmas Eve 2005.

"The Lord said to me: You are my son; this day I have begotten you". With these words of the second Psalm, the Church begins the Vigil Mass of Christmas, at which we celebrate the Birth of Jesus Christ our Redeemer in a stable in Bethlehem. This Psalm was once a part of the coronation rite of the kings of Judah. The People of Israel, in virtue of its election, considered itself in a special way a son of God, adopted by God. Just as the king was the personification of the people, his enthronement was experienced as a solemn act of adoption by God, whereby the King was in some way taken up into the very mystery of God. At Bethlehem night, these words, which were really more an expression of hope than a present reality, took on new and unexpected meaning. The Child lying in the manger is truly God’s Son. God is not eternal solitude but rather a circle of love and mutual self-giving. He is Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

But there is more: in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, God himself, God from God, became man. To him the Father says: "You are my son". God’s everlasting "today" has come down into the fleeting today of the world and lifted our momentary today into God’s eternal today. God is so great that he can become small. God is so powerful that he can make himself vulnerable and come to us as a defenceless child, so that we can love him. God is so good that he can give up his divine splendour and come down to a stable, so that we might find him, so that his goodness might touch us, give itself to us and continue to work through us. This is Christmas: "You are my son, this day I have begotten you". God has become one of us, so that we can be with him and become like him. As a sign, he chose the Child lying in the manger: this is how God is. This is how we come to know him. And on every child shines something of the splendour of that "today", of that closeness of God which we ought to love and to which we must yield – it shines on every child, even on those still unborn.

Let us listen to a second phrase from the liturgy of this holy Night, one taken from the Book of the Prophet Isaiah: "Upon the people who walked in darkness a great light has shone" (Is 9:1). The word "light" pervades the entire liturgy of tonight’s Mass. It is found again in the passage drawn from Saint Paul’s letter to Titus: "The grace of God has appeared" (2:11). The expression "has appeared", in the original Greek says the same thing that was expressed in Hebrew by the words "a light has shone": this "apparition" – this "epiphany" – is the breaking of God’s light upon a world full of darkness and unsolved problems. The Gospel then relates that the glory of the Lord appeared to the shepherds and "shone around them" (Lk 2:9). Wherever God’s glory appears, light spreads throughout the world. Saint John tells us that "God is light and in him is no darkness" (1 Jn 1:5). The light is a source of life.

But first, light means knowledge; it means truth, as contrasted with the darkness of falsehood and ignorance. Light gives us life, it shows us the way. But light, as a source of heat, also means love. Where there is love, light shines forth in the world; where there is hatred, the world remains in darkness. In the stable of Bethlehem there appeared the great light which the world awaits. In that Child lying in the stable, God has shown his glory – the glory of love, which gives itself away, stripping itself of all grandeur in order to guide us along the way of love. The light of Bethlehem has never been extinguished. In every age it has touched men and women, "it has shone around them". Wherever people put their faith in that Child, charity also sprang up – charity towards others, loving concern for the weak and the suffering, the grace of forgiveness. From Bethlehem a stream of light, love and truth spreads through the centuries. If we look to the Saints – from Paul and Augustine to Francis and Dominic, from Francis Xavier and Teresa of Avila to Mother Teresa of Calcutta – we see this flood of goodness, this path of light kindled ever anew by the mystery of Bethlehem, by that God who became a Child. In that Child, God countered the violence of this world with his own goodness. He calls us to follow that Child.

Along with the Christmas tree, our Austrian friends have also brought us a small flame lit in Bethlehem, as if to say that the true mystery of Christmas is the inner brightness radiating from this Child. May that inner brightness spread to us, and kindle in our hearts the flame of God’s goodness; may all of us, by our love, bring light to the world! Let us keep this light-giving flame, lit in faith, from being extinguished by the cold winds of our time! Let us guard it faithfully and give it to others! On this night, when we look towards Bethlehem, let us pray in a special way for the birthplace of our Redeemer and for the men and women who live and suffer there. We wish to pray for peace in the Holy Land: Look, O Lord, upon this corner of the earth, your Homeland, which is so very dear to you! Let your light shine upon it! Let it know peace!

The word "peace" brings us to a third key to the liturgy of this holy Night. The Child foretold by Isaiah is called "Prince of Peace". His kingdom is said to be one "of endless peace". The shepherds in the Gospel hear the glad tidings: "Glory to God in the highest" and "on earth, peace...". At one time we used to say: "to men of good will". Nowadays we say "to those whom God loves". What does this change mean? Is good will no longer important? We would do better to ask: who are those whom God loves, and why does he love them? Does God have favourites? Does he love only certain people, while abandoning the others to themselves? The Gospel answers these questions by pointing to some particular people whom God loves. There are individuals, like Mary, Joseph, Elizabeth, Zechariah, Simeon and Anna. But there are also two groups of people: the shepherds and the Wise Men from the East, the "Magi". Tonight let us look at the shepherds. What kind of people were they? In the world of their time, shepherds were looked down upon; they were considered untrustworthy and not admitted as witnesses in court. But really, who were they? To be sure, they were not great saints, if by that word we mean people of heroic virtue. They were simple souls. The Gospel sheds light on one feature which later on, in the words of Jesus, would take on particular importance: they were people who were watchful. This was chiefly true in a superficial way: they kept watch over their flocks by night. But it was also true in a deeper way: they were ready to receive God’s Word through the Angel's proclamation. Their life was not closed in on itself; their hearts were open. In some way, deep down, they were waiting for something; they were waiting for God. Their watchfulness was a kind of readiness – a readiness to listen and to set out. They were waiting for a light which would show them the way. That is what is important for God. He loves everyone, because everyone is his creature. But some persons have closed their hearts; there is no door by which his love can enter. They think that they do not need God, nor do they want him. Other persons, who, from a moral standpoint, are perhaps no less wretched and sinful, at least experience a certain remorse. They are waiting for God. They realize that they need his goodness, even if they have no clear idea of what this means. Into their expectant hearts God’s light can enter, and with it, his peace. God seeks persons who can be vessels and heralds of his peace. Let us pray that he will not find our hearts closed. Let us strive to be active heralds of his peace – in the world of today.

Among Christians, the word "peace" has taken on a very particular meaning: it has become a word to designate communion in the Eucharist. There Christ’s peace is present. In all the places where the Eucharist is celebrated, a great network of peace spreads through the world. The communities gathered around the Eucharist make up a kingdom of peace as wide as the world itself. When we celebrate the Eucharist we find ourselves in Bethlehem, in the "house of bread". Christ gives himself to us and, in doing so, gives us his peace. He gives it to us so that we can carry the light of peace within and give it to others. He gives it to us so that we can become peacemakers and builders of peace in the world. And so we pray: Lord, fulfil your promise! Where there is conflict, give birth to peace! Where there is hatred, make love spring up! Where darkness prevails, let light shine! Make us heralds of your peace! Amen.

Pope Pius XII on Christmas and Unity

The following was the Christmas message of Pope Pius XII in 1942. It dwells upon the need for societies that are peaceful from top to bottom in order to bring about a true representation of the incarnation.

As the Holy Christmas Season comes round each year, the message of Jesus, Who is light in the midst of darkness, echoes once more from the Crib of Bethlehem in the ears of Christians and re-echoes in their hearts with an ever new freshness of joy and piety. It is a message which lights up with heavenly truth a world that is plunged in darkness by fatal errors. It infuses exuberant and trustful joy into mankind, torn by the anxiety of deep, bitter sorrow. It proclaims liberty to the sons of Adam, shackled with the chains of sin and guilt. It promises mercy, love, peace to the countless hosts of those in suffering and tribulation who see their happiness Shattered and their efforts broken in the tempestuous strife and hate of our stormy days.

The church bells, which announce this message in every continent, not only recall the gift which God made to mankind at the dawn of the Christian Era; they also announce and proclaim a consoling reality of the present, a reality which is eternally young, living and lifegiving; it is the reality of the “True Light which enlighteneth every man that cometh into this World,” and which knows no setting. The Eternal Word, Who is the Way, the Truth and the Life, began His mission of saving and redeeming the human race by being born in the squalor of a stable and by thus ennobling and hallowing poverty.

He thus proclaimed and consecrated a message which is still, today, the Word of Eternal Life. That message can solve the most tortuous questions, unsolved and insoluble for those who bring to their investigations a mentality and an apparatus which are ephemeral and merely human; and those questions stand up, bleeding, imperiously demanding an answer, before the thought and the feeling of embittered and exasperated mankind.

The watchword “I have compassion on the multitude” is for Us a sacred trust which may not be abused; it remains strong, and impelling in all times and in all human situations, as it was the distinguishing mark of Jesus.

The Church would be untrue to herself, ceasing to be a mother, if she turned a deaf ear to her children’s anguished cries, which reach her from every class of the human family. She does not intend to take sides for any of the particular forms in which the several peoples and States strive to solve the gigantic problems of domestic order or international collaboration, as long as these forms conform to the law of God. But on the other hand, as the “Pillar and Ground of Truth” and guardian, by the will of God and the mandate of Christ, of the natural and supernatural order, the Church cannot renounce her right to proclaim to her sons and to the whole world the unchanging basic laws, saving them from every perversion, frustration, corruption, false interpretation and error.

This is all the more necessary for the fact that from the exact maintenance of these laws, and not merely by the effort of noble and courageous wills, depends in the last analysis the solidity of any national and international order, so fervently desired by all peoples. We know the qualities of courage and sacrifice of those peoples, and We also know their straitened conditions and their sorrow; and in this hour of unspeakable trial and strife We feel Ourselves bound to each and every one of them without exception, by a deep, all-embracing, unmovable affection, and by an immense desire to bring them every solace and help which is in any way at Our command.

Primary Elements of Social Life

In our last Christmas Message, We expounded the principles- which Christian thought suggests, for the establishment of an international order of friendly relations and collaboration such as to conform to the demands of God’s Law. Today We shall, with the consent, We feel, and the interested attention of all upright men, pause to consider very carefully and with equal impartiality, the fundamental laws of the internal order of the States and peoples.

International relations and internal order are intimately related. International equilibrium and harmony depend on the internal equilibrium and development of the individual States in the material, social and intellectual spheres. A firm steady peace policy towards other nations is, in fact, impossible without a spirit of peace within the nation which inspires trust. It is only, then, by striving for an integral peace, a peace in both fields, that people will be freed from the cruel nightmare of war, and the material and psychological causes of further discord and disorder will be diminished in a desire for peace, and hence aims at attaining peace, that “tranquil living together in order” in which St. Thomas finds the essence of peace. Two primary elements, then, regulate social life, a living together in order, and a living together in tranquillity.

Order

Order, which is fundamental in an association of men (of beings, that is, who strive to attain an end appropriate to their nature) is not merely external linking up of parts which are numerically distinct. It is rather, and must be, a tendency and an ever more perfect approach to an internal union; and this does not exclude differences founded in fact and sanctioned by the will of God or by supernatural standard.

A clear understanding of the genuine fundamentals of all social life has a capital importance today as never before, when mankind, impregnated by the poison of error and social aberrations, tormented by the fever of discordant desires, doctrines, and aims, is excitedly tossing about in the disorder which it has itself created, and is experiencing the destructive force of false ideas that disregard the Law of God or are opposed to it. And since disorder can only be overcome by an order which is not merely superimposed and fictitious (just as darkness with its fearful and depressing effects can only be driven away by light and not by will o’ the wisps); so security, reorganizations, progressive improvement cannot be expected and cannot be brought about unless by a return of large and influential sections to correct notions about security.

It is a return which calls for the Grace of God in large measure, and for a resolute will, ready and prepared for sacrifice on the part of good farseeing men. From these influential circles who are more capable of penetrating and appreciating the beauty of just social norms, there will pass on and infiltrate into the masses the clear knowledge of the true, divine, spiritual origin of social life. Thus the way will be cleared for the reawakening, the growth and fixing of those moral principles without which even the proudest achievements create but a babel in which the citizens, though they live inside the same walls, speak different and incoherent languages.

From individual and social life we should rise to God, the First Cause and Ultimate Foundation, as He is the Creator of the first conjugal society, from which we have the society which is the family, and the society of peoples and of nations. As an image, albeit imperfect, of its Exemplar, the One and Triune God, Who through the Mystery of the Incarnation, redeemed and raised human nature, life in society, in its ideals and in its end, possesses by the light of reason and of revelation a moral authority and an absoluteness which transcend every temporal change. It has a power of attraction that, far from being weakened or lessened by delusions, errors, failures, draws irresistibly the noblest and most faithful souls to the Lord, to take up with renewed energy, with added knowledge, with new studies, methods and means, the enterprises which in other times and circumstances were tried in vain.

The origin and the primary scope of social life is the conservation, development and perfection of the human person, helping him to realize accurately the demands and values of religion and culture set by the Creator for every man and for all mankind, both as a whole and in its natural ramifications.

A social teaching or a social reconstruction program which denies or prescinds from this internal essential relation to God of everything that regards men, is on a false course; and while it builds up with one hand, it prepares with the other the materials which sooner or later will undermine and destroy the whole fabric. And when it disregards the respect due to the human person and to the life which is proper to that person, and gives no thought to it in its organization, in legislative and executive activity, then instead of serving society, it harms it; instead of encouraging and stimulating social thought, instead of realizing its hopes and expectations, it strips it of all real value and reduces it to a utilitarian formula which is openly rejected by constantly increasing groups.

If social life implies intrinsic unity, it does not, at the same time, exclude differences which are founded in fact and nature. When we hold fast to God, the Supreme Controller of all that relates to man, then the similarities no less than the differences of men find their allotted place in the fixed order of being, of values, and hence also of morality. When, however, this foundation is removed, there is a dangerous lack of cohesion in the various spheres of culture; the frontier of true value becomes uncertain and shifting, even to the point where mere external factors, and often blind instincts, come to determine, according to the prevalent fashion of the day, who is to have control of this or that direction.

After the fateful economy of the past decades, during which the lives of all citizens were subordinated to the stimulus of gain, there now succeeds another and no less fateful policy which, while it considers everybody with reference to the State, excludes all thought of ethics or religion. This is a fatal travesty, a fatal error. It is calculated to bring about far-reaching consequences for social life, which is never nearer to losing its noblest prerogatives than when it thinks it can deny or forget with impunity the external source of its own dignity: God.

Reason, enlightened by faith, assigns to individuals and to particular societies in the social organization a definite and exalted place. It knows, to mention only the most important, that the whole political and economic activity of the State is directed to the permanent realization of the common good.

In a conception of society which is pervaded and sanctioned by religious thought, the influence of economics and of every other sphere of cultural activity represents a universal and most exalted center of activity, very rich in its variety and coherent in its harmony, in which men’s intellectual equality and diversity of occupation come into their own and secure adequate expression. When this is not so, work is depreciated and the worker is belittled.

That social life, such as God willed it, may attain its scope, it needs a juridical order to support it from without, to defend and protect it. The function of this juridical order is not to dominate but to serve, to help the development and increase of society’s vitality in the rich multiplicity of its ends, leading all the individual energies to their perfection in peaceful completion, and defending them with appropriate and honest means against all that may militate against those who only by this means can be held within the noble discipline of social life. But in the just fulfillment of this right, an authority which is truly worthy of the name will always be painfully conscious of its responsibility in the sight of the Eternal Judge, before Whose Tribunal every wrong judgment, and especially every revolt against the order established by God, will receive without fail its sanction and its condemnation.

The precise, bedrock, basic rules that govern society cannot be prejudiced by the intervention of human agency. They can be denied, overlooked, despised, transgressed, but they can never be overthrown with legal validity. It is true indeed that, as time goes on, conditions of life change. But there is never a complete break or a complete discontinuity between the law of yesterday and that of today, between the disappearance of old powers and constitutions and the appearance of a new order. In any case, whatever be the change or transformation, the scope of every social life remains identical, sacred, obligatory; it is the development of the personal values of man as the image of God; and the obligation remains with every member of the human family to realize his unchangeable destiny, whosoever be the legislator and the authority whom he obeys.

In consequence, there always remains, too, his inalienable right, which no opposition can nullify — a right which must be respected by friend and foe — to a legal order and practice which appreciate and understand that it is their essential duty to serve the common good.

The juridical order has, besides, the high and difficult scope of insuring harmonious relations both between individuals and between societies, and within these. This scope will be reached if legislators will abstain from following those perilous theories and practices, so harmful to communities to their spirit of union, which derive their origin and promulgation from false postulates. Among such postulates We must count the juridical positivism which attributes a deceptive majesty to the setting up of purely human laws, and which leaves the way open for a fatal divorce of law from morality.

There is, besides, the conception which claims for particular nations, or classes, the juridical instinct as the final imperative and the norm from which there is no appeal; finally, there are those various theories which, differing among themselves, and deriving from opposite ideologies, agree in considering the State, or a group which represents it, as an absolute and supreme entity, exempt from control and from criticism even when its theoretical and practical postulates result in and offend by, their open denial of essential tenets of the human Christian conscience.

Anyone who considers with an open and penetrating mind the vital connection between social order and a genuine juridical order, and who is conscious of the fact that internal order in all its complexity depends on the predominance of spiritual forces, on the respect of human dignity in oneself and in others, on the love of society and of its God-given ends, cannot wonder at the sad effects of juridical conceptions which, far from the royal road of truth, proceed on the insecure ground of materialistic postulates. But he will realize at once the urgent need of a return to a conception of law which is spiritual and ethical, serious and profound, vivified by the warmth of true humanity and illumined by the splendor of the Christian Faith, which bids us seek in the juridical order an outward refraction of the social order willed by God, a luminous product of the spirit of man which is in turn the image of the Spirit of God.

On this organic conception which alone is living, in which the noblest humanity and the most genuine Christian spirit flourish in harmony, there is marked the Scripture thought, expounded by the great Aquinas: [Opus Justitiae Pax] — The work of justice shall be peace — a thought which is applicable to the internal as to the external aspect of social life. It admits of neither contrast nor alternative such as expressed in the disjunction, love or right, but of the fruitful synthesis, love and right. In the one as in the other, since both radiate from the same Spirit of God, We read the program and the seal of the human spirit; they complement one another, give each other life and support, walk hand in hand along the road of concord and pacification, while right clears the way for love and love makes right less stern, and gives it a higher meaning. Both elevate human life to that social atmosphere where, even amid the failings, the obstacles and the difficulties of this earth a fraternal community of life is made possible.

But once let the baneful spirit of materialist ideas predominate; let the urge for power and for predominance take in its rough hands the direction of affairs; you shall then find its disruptive effects appearing daily in greater measure; you shall see love and justice disappear; all this as the sad foretaste of the catastrophes that menace society when it abandons God.

Tranquillity

The second fundamental element of peace, towards which every human society tends almost instinctively, is tranquillity.

O blessed tranquillity, thou has nothing in common with the spirit of holding fixedly and obstinately, unrelenting and with childish stubbornness, to things as they are; nor yet with the reluctance-child of cowardice and selfishness — to put one’s mind to the solution of problems and questions which the passage of time and the succession of generations, with their different needs and progress, make actual, and bring up a burning question of the day. But for a Christian who is conscious of his responsibilities even towards the least of his brethren, there is no such thing as slothful tranquillity; nor is there question of flight, but of struggle, of action against every inaction and desertion in the great spiritual combat where the stakes are the construction, nay the very soul, of the society of tomorrow.

In the mind of Aquinas, tranquillity and feverish activity are not opposed, but rather form a well-balanced pair for him who is inspired by the beauty and the urgency of the spiritual foundations of society, and of the nobility of its ideals. To you, young people, who are wont to turn your back on the past, and to rely on the future for your aspirations and your hopes, We address Ourselves with ardent love and fatherly anxiety; enthusiasm and courage do not of themselves suffice, if they be not, as they should be, placed in the service of good and of a spotless cause. It is vain to agitate, to weary yourselves, to bustle about without ever resting. You must be inspired with the conviction that you are fighting for truth, that you are sacrificing in the cause of truth your own tastes and energies wishes, and sacrifices; that you are fighting for the eternal laws of God, for the dignity of the human person, and for the attainment of its destiny.

When mature men and young men, while remaining always at anchor, in the sea of the eterna11y active tranquillity of God, coordinate their differences of temperament and activity in a genuine Christian spirit, then if the propelling element is joined to the refraining element, the natural differences between the generations will never become dangerous, and will even conduce vigorously to the enforcement of the eternal laws of God in the changing course of times and of conditions of life.

In one field of social life, where for a whole century there was agitation and bitter conflict, there is today a calm, at least on the surface. We speak of the vast and ever growing world of labor, of the immense army of workers, of breadwinners and dependents. If we consider the present with its wartime exigencies, as an admitted fact, then this calm may be called a necessary and reasonable demand; but if we look at the present situation in the light of justice, and with reference to a legitimately regulated labor movement, then the tranquillity will remain only apparent, until the scope of such a movement be attained.

Always moved by religious motives, the Church has condemned the various forms of Marxist Socialism; and she condemns them today, because it is her permanent right and duty to safeguard men from currents as thought and influences that jeopardize their external salvation. But the Church cannot ignore or overlook the fact that the worker in his efforts to better his lot, is opposed by a machinery which is not only not in accordance with nature, but is at variance with God’s plan and with the purpose He had in creating the goods of earth.

In spite of the fact that the ways they followed were and are false and to be condemned, what man, and especially what priest or Christian, could remain deaf to the cries that rise from the depths and call for justice and a spirit of brotherly collaboration in a world ruled by a just God? Such silence would be culpable and unjustifiable before God, and contrary to the inspired teaching of the Apostle, who, while he inculcates the need of resolution in the fight against error, also knows that we must be full of sympathy for those who err, and open-minded in our understanding of their aspirations, hopes and motives.

When He blessed our first parents, God said: “Increase and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it.” And to the first father of a family, He said later: “In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread.” The dignity of the human person, then, requires normally as a natural foundation of life the right to the use of the goods of the earth. To this right corresponds the fundamental obligation to grant private ownership of property, if possible, to all. Positive legislation regulating private ownership may change and more or less restrict its use. But if legislation is to play its part in the pacification of the community, it must prevent the worker, who is or will be a father of a family, from being condemned to an economic dependence and slavery which is irreconcilable with his rights as a person. Whether this slavery arises from the exploitation of private capital or from the power of the state, the result is the same. Indeed, under the pressure of a State which dominates all and controls the whole field of public and private life, even going into the realm of ideas and beliefs and of conscience, this lack of liberty can have the more serious consequences, as experience shows and proves.

Five Points for Ordering Society

Anyone who considers in the light of reason and of faith the foundations and the aims of social life, which we have traced in broad outline, and contemplates them in their purity and moral sublimity, and in their benefits in every sphere of life, cannot but be convinced of the powerful contribution to order and pacification which efforts directed towards great ideals and resolved to face difficulties, could present, or better, could restore to a world which is internally unhinged, when once they had thrown down the intellectual and juridical barriers, created by prejudice, errors, indifferences, and by a long tradition of secularization of thought, feeling, action which succeeded in detaching and subtracting the early city from the light and force of the City of God. Today, as never before, the hour has come for reparation, for rousing the conscience of the world from the heavy torpor into which the drugs of false ideas, widely diffused, have sunk it. This is all the more so because in this hour of material and moral disintegration the appreciation of the emptiness and inconsistency of every purely human order is beginning to disillusion even those who, in days of apparent happiness, were not conscious of the need of contact with the eternal in themselves or in society, and did not look upon its absence as an essential defect in their constitutions. What was clear to the Christian, who in his deeply founded faith was pained by the ignorance of others, is now presented to us in dazzling clearness by the din of appalling catastrophe which the present upheaval brings to man and which portrays all the terrifying lineaments of a general judgment even for the tepid, the indifferent, the frivolous. It is indeed, an old truth which comes out in ever new forms and thunders through the ages and through the nations from the mouth of the Prophet: “All that forsake thee shall be confounded; they who depart from thee, shall be written in the earth; because they have forsaken the Lord, the Vein of Living Waters.”

The call of the moment is not lamentation but action; not lamentation over what has been, but reconstruction of what is to arise and must arise for the good of society. It is for the best and most distinguished members of the Christian family, filled with the enthusiasm of Crusaders, to unite in the spirit of truth, justice and love to the call; God wills it, ready to serve, to sacrifice themselves, like the Crusaders of old.

If the issue was then the liberation of the land hallowed by the life of the Incarnate Word of God, the call today is, if We may so express Ourselves, to traverse the sea of errors of our day and to march on to free the holy land of the spirit, which is destined to sustain in its foundations the unchangeable norms and laws on which will rise a social construction of solid internal consistency. With this lofty purpose before Us, We turn from the crib of the Prince of Peace, confident that His grace is diffused in all hearts, to you, beloved children, who recognized and adore in Christ your Savior; We turn to all those who are united with Us at least by the bond of faith in God; We turn, finally to all those who would be free of doubt and error, and who desire light and guidance; and We exhort you with suppliant paternal insistence not only to realize fully the dreadful gravity of this hour, but also to meditate upon the vistas of good and supernatural benefit which it opens up, and to unite and collaborate towards the renewal of society in spirit and truth.

The essential aim of this necessary and holy crusade is that the Star of Peace, the Star of Bethlehem, may shine out again over the whole mankind in all its brilliant splendor and reassuring consolation as a pledge and augury of a future better, more fruitful and happier. It is true that the road from night to full day will be long; but of decisive importance are the first steps on the path, the first five mile-stones of which bear chiseled on them the following maxims:

1. Dignity of the Human Person. He who would have the Star of Peace shine out and stand over society should cooperate, for his part, in giving back to the human person the dignity given to it by God from the very beginning; should oppose the excessive herding of men, as if they were a mass without a soul; their economic, social, political, intellectual and moral inconsistency; their dearth of solid principles and strong convictions, their surfeit of instinctive sensible excitement and their fickleness.

He should favor, by every lawful means, in every sphere of life, social institutions in which a full personal responsibility is assured and guaranteed both in the early and the eternal order of things. He should uphold respect for and the practical realization of the following fundamental personal rights; the right to maintain and develop one’s corporal, intellectual and moral life and especially the right to religious formation and education; the right to worship God in private and public and to carry on religious works of charity; the right to marry and to achieve the aim of married life; the right to conjugal and domestic society; the right to work, as the indispensable means towards the maintenance of family life; the right to free choice of state of life, and hence, too, of the priesthood or religious life; the right to the use of material goods; in keeping with his duties and social limitations

2. Defense of Social Unity. He who would have the Star of Peace shine out and stand over society should reject every form of materialism which sees in the people only a herd of individuals who, divided and without any internal cohesion, are considered as a mass to be forded over and treated arbitrarily; he should strive to understand society as an intrinsic unity, which has grown up and matured under the guidance of Providence, a unity which within the bounds assigned to it and according to its own peculiar gifts — tends, with the collaboration of the various classes and professions, towards the eternal and ever new aims of culture and religion.

He should defend the indissolubility of matrimony; he should give to the family — that unique cell of the people — space, light and air so that it may attend to its mission of perpetuating new life, and of educating children in a spirit corresponding to its own true religious convictions, and that it may preserve, fortify and reconstitute, according to its powers, its proper economic, spiritual, moral and juridic unity. He should take care that the material and spiritual advantages of the family be shared by the domestic servants; he should strive to secure for every family a dwelling where a materially and morally healthy family life may be seen in all its vigor and worth; he should take care that the place of work be not so separated from the home as to make the head of the family and educator of the children a virtual stranger to his own household; he should take care above all that the bond of trust and mutual help should be reestablished between the family and the public school, that bond which in other times gave such happy results, but which now has been replaced by mistrust where the school, influenced and controlled by the spirit of materialism, corrupts and destroys what the parents have instilled into the minds of the children.

3. Dignity of Labor. He who would have the Star of Peace shine out and stand over society should give to work the place assigned to it by God from the beginning. As an indispensable means towards gaining over the world that mastery which God wishes, for His glory, all work has an inherent dignity and at the same time a close connection with the perfection of the person; this is the noble dignity and privilege of work which is not any way cheapened by the fatigue and the burden, which have to be borne as the effect of original sin, in obedience and submission to the will of God.

Those who are familiar with the great Encyclicals of Our predecessors and Our Own previous messages know well that the Church does not hesitate to draw the practical conclusions which are derived from the moral nobility of work, and to give them all the support of her authority. These exigencies include, besides a just wage which covers the needs of the worker and his family, the conservation and perfection of a social order which will make possible an assured, even if modest, private property for all classes of society, which will promote higher education for the children of the working class who are especially endowed with intelligence and good will, will promote the care and the practice of the social spirit in one’s immediate neighborhood, in the district, the province, the people and the nation, a spirit which, by smoothing over friction arising from privileges or class interests, removes from the workers the sense of isolation through the assuring experience of a genuinely human, and fraternally Christian, solidarity.

The progress and the extent of urgent social reforms depend on the economic possibilities of single Nations. It is only through an intelligent and generous sharing of forces between the strong and the weak that it will be possible to effect a universal pacification in such wise as not to leave behind centers of conflagration and infection from which new disasters may come. There are evident signs which go to show that, in the ferment of all the prejudices and feelings of hate, those inevitable but lamentable offspring of the war psychosis, there is still aflame in the people the consciousness of their intimate mutual dependence for good or for evil, nay, that this consciousness is more alive and active. It is not true that deep thinkers see ever more clearly in the renunciation of egoism and national isolation, the way to general salvation, ready as they are to demand of their peoples, a heavy participation in the sacrifices necessary for social well-being in other peoples?

May this Christmas Message of Ours, addressed to all those who are animated by a good and generous heart, encourage and increase the legions of these social crusades in every nation. And may God deign to give to their peaceful cause the victory of which their noble enterprise is worthy.

4. The Rehabilitation of Juridical Order. He who would have the Star of Peace shine out and stand over social life should collaborate towards a complete rehabilitation of the juridical order. The juridic sense of today is often altered and overturned by the profession and the practice of positivism and a utilitarianism which are subjected and bound to the service of determined groups, classes and movements, whose programs direct and determine the course of legislation and the practices of the courts. The cure of this situation becomes feasible when we awaken again the consciousness of a juridical order resting on the supreme dominion of God, and safeguarded from all human whims; a consciousness of an order which stretches forth its arm, in protection or punishment, over the unforgettable rights of man and protects them against the attacks of every human power.

From the juridic order, as willed by God, flows man’s inalienable right to juridical security, and by this very fact to a definite sphere of rights, immune from all arbitrary attack. The relations of man to man, of the individual to society, to authority, to civil duties; the relations of society and of authority to the individual, should be placed on a firm juridic footing and be guarded, when the need arises, by the authority of the courts. This supposes:

a) A tribunal and a judge who take their directions from a clearly formulated and defined right.

b) Clear juridical norms which may not be overturned by unwarranted appeals to a supposed popular sentiment or by merely utilitarian considerations.

c) The recognition of the principle that even the State and the functionaries and organizations depend on it are obliged to repair and to withdraw measures which are harmful to the liberty, property, honor, progress of health of the individuals.

5. Christian Conception of the State. He who would have the Star of Peace shine out and stand over human society should cooperate towards the setting up of a State conception and practice founded on reasonable discipline, exalted kindliness and responsible Christian spirit. He should help to restore the State and its power to the service of human society, to the full recognition of the respect due to the human person and his efforts to attain his eternal destiny. He should apply and devote himself to dispelling the errors which aim at causing the State and its authority to deviate from the path of morality, at severing them from the eminently ethical bond which links them to individual and social life, and at making them deny or in practice ignore their essential dependence on the will of the Creator. He should work for the recognition and diffusion of the truth which teaches, even in matters of this world, that the deepest meaning, the ultimate moral basis and the universal validity of “reigning” lies in “serving.”

Postwar Renovation of Society

Beloved Children, may God grant that while you listen to Our voice your heart may be profoundly stirred and moved by the deeply felt seriousness, the loving solicitude, the unremitting insistence, with which We drive home these thoughts, which are meant as an appeal to the conscience of the world, and a rallying-cry to all those who are ready to ponder and weigh the grandeur of their mission and responsibility by the vastness of this universal disaster.

A great part of mankind, and, let Us not shirk from saying it, not a few who call themselves Christians, have to some extent their share in the collective responsibility for the growth of error and for the harm and the lack of moral fiber in the society of today.

What is this world war, with all its attendant circumstances, whether they be remote or proximate causes, its progress and material, legal and moral effects? What is it but the crumbling process, not expected, perhaps, by the thoughtless but seen and depreciated by those whose gaze penetrated into the realities of a social order which hid its mortal weakness and its unbridled lust for gain and power? That which in peace-time lay coiled up, broke loose at the outbreak of war in a sad succession of acts at variance with the human and Christian sense. International agreements to make war less inhuman by confining it to the combatants to regulate the procedure of occupation and imprisonment of the conquered remained in various places a dead letter. And who can see the end of this progressive demoralization of the people, who can wish to watch helplessly this disastrous progress? Should they not rather, over the ruins of a social order which has given such tragic proof of its ineptitude as a factor for the good of the people, gather together the hearts of all those who are magnanimous and upright, in the solemn vow not to rest until in all peoples and all nations of the earth a vast legion shall be formed of those handfuls of men who, bent on bringing back society to its center of gravity, which is the law of God, aspire to the service of the human person and of his common life ennobled in God.

Mankind owes that vow to the countless dead who lie buried on the field of battle: The sacrifice of their lives in the fulfillment of their duty is a holocaust offered for a new and better social order. Mankind owes that vow to the innumerable sorrowing host of mothers, widows and orphans who have seen the light, the solace and the support of their lives wrenched from them. Mankind owes that vow to those numberless exiles whom the hurricane of war has torn from their native land and scattered in the land of the stranger; who can make their own the lament of the Prophet: “Our inheritance is turned to aliens; our house to strangers.” Mankind owes that vow to the hundreds of thousands of persons who, without any fault on their part, sometimes only because of their nationality or race, have been consigned to death or to a slow decline. Mankind owes that vow to the many thousands of non- combatants, women, children, sick and aged, from whom aerial war-fare — whose horrors we have from the beginning frequently denounced — has without discrimination or through inadequate precautions, taken life, goods, health, home, charitable refuge, or house of prayer. Mankind owes that vow to the flood of tears and bitterness, to the accumulation of sorrow and suffering, emanating from the murderous ruin of the dreadful conflict and crying to Heaven to send down the Holy Spirit to liberate the world from the inundation of violence and terror.

And where could you with greater assurance and trust and with more efficacious faith place this vow for the renewal of society than at the foot of the “Desired of all Nations” Who lies before us in the crib with all the charm of His sweet humanity as a Babe, but also in the dynamic attraction of His incipient mission as Redeemer? Where could this noble and holy crusade for the cleaning and renewal of society have a more significant consecration or find a more potent inspiration than at Bethlehem, where the new Adam appears in the adorable mystery of the Incarnation? For it is at His fountains of truth and grace that mankind should find the water of life if it is not to perish in the desert of this life; “Of His fullness we all have received.” His fullness of grace and truth cows as freely today as it has for twenty centuries on the world.

His light can overcome the darkness, the rays of His love can conquer the icy egoism which holds so many back from becoming great and conspicuous in their higher life. To you, crusader-volunteers of a distinguished new society, live up to the new call for moral and Christian rebirth, declare war on the darkness which comes from deserting God, of the coolness that comes from strife between brothers. It is a fight for the human race, which is gravely ill and must be healed in the name of conscience ennobled by Christianity.

May Our blessing and Our paternal good wishes and encouragement go with your generous enterprise, and may they remain with all those who do not shirk hard sacrifices — those weapons which are more potent than any steel to combat the evil from which society suffers. Over your crusade for a social, human and Christian ideal may there shine out as a consolation and an inspiration the star that stands over the Grotto of Bethlehem, the first and the perennial star of the Christian Era. From the sign of it every faithful heart drew, draws and ever will draw strength; “If armies in camp should stand against me, my heart shall not fear.” Where that star shines, there is Christ. “With Him for leader we shall not wander; through Him let us go to Him, that with the Child that is born today we may rejoice.

USA Allows Satanists to Install Mock Nativity Display

The United States of America has allowed sick Satanists to install a shrine to demons in mockery of Our Lord Jesus Christ at the Illinois State Capitol.

Citing so called ‘religious freedom’, cowardly politicians have refused to stop the sick display from being established.

The organisers of the demonic installation, the Satanic Temple, taunted local Bishop Thomas Paprocki by inviting him to witness the event.

The bishop stated that the Satanic filth:

should have no place in this Capitol or any other place

A spokesperson for the Diocese told the media:

Mocking the millions of Christians in the state of Illinois and billions around the world by depicting the baby Jesus this Christmas with the ‘satanic deity’ Baphomet is the very definition of evil and causing division, but that is to be expected from an organization that is in existence to troll people of faith

“Bishop Paprocki declines the invitation to associate with evil and urges all people of true religious faith to shun the devil

There is no other country in the world where this sort of behaviour would be tolerated by Christians. The United States of America is the only nation where open devil worship is permitted in such an important building at Christmas time. There is not a Muslim, Communist or atheistic country that excuses this behaviour, so why does the United States allow for it? Why has the nominally Catholic President of the Untied States said nothing?

Orange Order Flex Strength With Trinity College Branch

Buoyed by recent support from Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald and Fine Gael politician Neale Richmond, anti Catholic group the Orange Order have reopened a ‘dormant’ branch in the historic symbol of Anglo Protestant power in Dublin, Trinity College.

The group, who have complained about being compared to the Ku Klux Klan and other arch Protestant groups, have become more openly visible in the South of Ireland over the past number of years. Then Taoiseach Leo Varadkar, who was educated in a Protestant school and who celebrated abortion in a former seat of Protestant power at Dublin Castle in 2018, visited an Orange Lodge in an official capacity last year and was gifted with a glass obelisk as a thank you. Varadkar, who was Tanaiste when the Irish government surrounded Fr. PJ Hughes and his church earlier this year because he was saying Mass, has also said that he would love to an Orange Order march through Dublin.

His party compatriot Neale Richmond also refused to apologise after being photographed near a banner honouring Oliver Cromwell, who raped, murdered and enslaved tens of thousands of Irish Catholics as part of his ethnic cleansing campaign during the anti Catholic and anti Gaelic genocide of 1649.

Richmond’s refusal to apologise was trumped by ‘Republican’ Mary Lou McDonald, who has gone on record as stating that she wants to force the entire island of Ireland to celebrate the Orange Order’s hatred for Catholicism every 12th of July.

Now, as part of the their increasing arrogance, the Order have openly expressed their reopening of their lodge at Trinity College, which had not been used publicly since 1966. After holding a formal ceremony this past week, they stated that they hope for more lodges to be established around the country.

It is not hard to imagine that they will have a lot of interest, particularly from members of Fine Gael and Sinn Fein, who have showed immense interest in the legacy of the Orange Order recently. In the past decade, this has included shutting the Vatican Embassy as Fine Gael did or picketing Catholic churches as Sinn Fein have done.

In a 2000 article for The Guardian, Henry McDonald summed up the hatred that envelopes the dark heart of the Orange Order:

None the less, anti-Catholicism lies at the root of Orange thought and not unionism; it remains a potent force. Worst of all, its final logical terminus is eliminationist, just as anti-Semitism was in Germany.

After all, if you believe that Catholic men, women and children will burn in the fires of Hell if they do not convert to the true faith, what's wrong with petrol-bombing their homes and burning them out of your streets?

Medical Experts SLAM Assisted Suicide Plans

As the far left gains momentum in trying to provide a legal framework for disposing of those perceived as unwanted and burdensome, the College of Psychiatrists has strongly objected to the plans in a powerful new statement.

Read their press release here:

The College of Psychiatrists of Ireland (College of Psychiatrists) has warned that physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia (PAS-E) is not compatible with good medical care and that its introduction in Ireland could place vulnerable patients at risk.

PAS-E is also known as “assisted dying” and in the New Year the issue will be the focus of a Special Oireachtas Committee set up to examine the Dying with Dignity Bill (2020).

The College of Psychiatrists is the professional and training body for psychiatrists in Ireland and represents 1,000 professional psychiatrists (both specialists and trainees) across the country.  It has today published a position paper on this issue [see editors’ note below] which sets out some key issues regarding the introduction of assisted dying in Ireland.  These include:

  • Assisted dying is contrary to the efforts of psychiatrists, other mental health staff and the public to prevent deaths by suicide.

  • It is likely to place vulnerable people at risk – many requests for assisted dying stem from issues such as fear of being a burden or fear of death rather than from intractable pain. Improvements in existing services should be deployed to manage these issues.

  • While often introduced for patients with terminal illness, once introduced assisted dying is likely to be applied more broadly to other groups, such that the numbers undertaking the procedure grow considerably above expectations;

  • The introduction of assisted dying represents a radical change in Irish law and a long-standing tradition of medical practice, as exemplified in the prohibition of deliberate killing in the Irish Medical Council ethics guidelines;

 

Consultant Liaison Psychiatrist Dr Eric Kelleher is a member of the College of Psychiatrists and contributing author to the position paper on assisted dying.

Speaking today, he said: “We are acutely aware of the sensitivity of this subject, and understand and support the fact that dying with dignity is the goal of all end-of-life care. Strengthening our palliative care and social support networks makes this possible. Not only is assisted dying or euthanasia not necessary for a dignified death, but techniques used to bring about death can themselves result in considerable and protracted suffering”.

“Where assisted dying is available, many requests stem, not from intractable pain, but from such causes as fear, depression, loneliness, and the wish not to burden carers. With adequate resources, including psychiatric care, psychological care, palliative medicine, pain services, and social supports, good end-of-life care is possible,” he said.

Dr Siobhan MacHale, Consultant Liaison Psychiatrist, a member of the College of Psychiatrists and contributing author to the position paper on assisted dying, said: “Once permitted in a jurisdiction, experience has shown that more and more people die from assisted dying. This is usually the result of progressively broadening criteria through legal challenges because, if a right to assisted dying is conceded, there is no logical reason to restrict this to those with a terminal illness.”

She continued: “Both sides of this debate support the goal of dying with dignity, but neither the proposed legislation nor the status quo (as evidenced by both clinical experience and the power of this debate) is sufficient. It is imperative for the Irish people to continue to demonstrate leadership as a liberal and compassionate society in working together to achieve this.”

READ THE FULL STATEMENT HERE:

Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia – The College of Psychiatrists of Ireland (irishpsychiatry.ie)

Dublin Honours Christ on Streets at Christmas

Irish Society for Christian Civilisation – ISFCC, an organization of lay Catholics, held three Christmas rallies on O’Connell St., Dublin on the 4th, 11th and 18th of December. Approximately seventy people attended each rally. The participants prayed the Joyful Mysteries of the Rosary and sang traditional Christmas carols such as Silent Night and Angels We Have Heard on High.

When asked why ISFCC organized these rallies, Damien Murphy, the rally leader, said, “We’re here today for two reasons. First, to bring the true joy and peace of Christmas - which is Our Lord Jesus Christ - to people who walk by us and, also, to oppose the secularization of Christmas in Ireland”

The scene moved many people, who often stopped and participated in the carols. The Child Jesus on a cushion in the centre of the rally also touched many others.

“The world is facing multiple crises.” said Damien. “People need to realise that Our Lady has already given us the solution to these problems when she appeared in Fatima and asked us to pray the Rosary every day.”

“The Rosary strengthens us. Through the Rosary, God gives us the wisdom and prudence to solve our problems because at the heart of every crisis in the world today lies a moral problem. A corrupt society will never be able to succeed but slowly sink into chaos.”

While the idea of Christmas rallies is new, ISFCC has held similar rallies in Dublin at the same location for almost ten years.

“We also have monthly Rosary Rallies here at the same place (O’Connell Street) once a month from May to October and get similar numbers, though our last one in October had around 200 people.” continued Damien.

Irish Society for Christian Civilisation and its campaign Ireland Needs Fatima is part of the worldwide movement called Tradition, Family, and Property founded in Brazil by the late Prof. Plinio Correa de Oliveira.



Latin Attacked Again

Just in time for Christmas, you can read the Vatican’s latest attack on the church’s universal tongue here as the language is limited in Baptisms, Weddings and Confirmations amongst others.

Given that liberals in the Vatican are now pushing for the recognition of Anglican ‘ordinations’ and that English will now be mandatory in most Irish churches, one can only wonder if the Irish martyrs could see this now, how would they feel?

You can read the ridiculous and spiteful document below.

******

Your Eminence / Most Reverend Excellency,

 after the publication by Pope Francis of the Apostolic Letter in the form of a "Motu Proprio" Traditionis custodes on the use of liturgical books prior to the reform of the Second Vatican Council, they reached the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments - which, exercises the authority of the Holy See for matters within its competence (cf. Traditionis custodes , n. 7) - various requests for clarification on its correct application. Some questions have been raised by several parties and with greater frequency: therefore, after having carefully evaluated them, after having informed the Holy Father and having received his consent, the answers to the most recurring questions are now published.

The text of the Motu Proprio and the Letter to all the Bishops that accompanies it clearly express the reasons for what Pope Francis has ordered. The first aim is to continue "in the constant search for ecclesial communion" ( Traditionis custodes , Premessa) which is expressed by recognizing in the liturgical books promulgated by the Holy Pontiffs Paul VI and John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of the Second Vatican Council, the only expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite (cf. Traditionis custodes, no. 1). This is the direction in which we want to walk and this is the meaning of the answers that we publish here: every prescribed norm always has the sole purpose of safeguarding the gift of ecclesial communion by walking together, with conviction of mind and heart, in the line indicated by the Holy Father.

It is sad to see how the deepest bond of unity - participation in the one broken Bread which is His Body offered so that all may be one (cf. Jn 17:21) - becomes a reason for division: it is the task of the Bishops, cum Petro et sub Petro , to safeguard communion, a necessary condition - the Apostle Paul reminds us of this (cf. 1 Cor 11: 17-34) - in order to participate in the Eucharistic table.

One fact is undeniable: the Council Fathers felt the urgency of a reform so that the truth of the faith celebrated would appear more and more in all its beauty and the people of God would grow in a full, active, conscious participation in the liturgical celebration (cf. Sacrosanctum Concilium n.14 ), present moment in the history of salvation, memorial of the Lord's Passover, our only hope.

As Pastors we must not lend ourselves to sterile polemics, capable only of creating division, in which the ritual fact is often exploited by ideological visions. Rather, we are all called to rediscover the value of the liturgical reform by safeguarding the truth and beauty of the Rite it has given us. For this to happen, we are aware that a renewed and continuous liturgical formation is necessary both for priests and for the lay faithful.

In the solemn closing of the second session of the Council (December 4, 1963) St. Paul VI expressed himself as follows (n.11):

"After all, this passionate and complex discussion was by no means without abundant fruit: in fact that theme which was first of all addressed, and which in a certain sense is pre-eminent in the Church, both by its nature and by its dignity - we mean the sacred Liturgy - has reached a happy conclusion, and today comes to us with a solemn rite promulgated. For this reason Our soul rejoices with sincere joy. In this fact we recognize that the just order of values ​​and duties has been respected: in this way we have recognized that the place of honor must be reserved for God; that we as a first duty are obliged to raise prayers to God; that the sacred Liturgy is the primary source of that divine exchange in which the life of God is communicated to us, it is the first school of our soul, it is the first gift that must be given by us to the Christian people, united with us in faith and assiduity to prayer; finally, the first invitation to humanity to loosen its mute tongue in holy and sincere prayers and to feel that ineffable regenerating force of the soul that is inherent in singing with us the praises of God and in the hope of men, for Jesus Christ and in the Holy Spirit ».

When Pope Francis (Address to the 68. But National Liturgical Week, Rome, August 24, 2017) reminds us that "after this teaching, after this long journey we can say with confidence and with magisterial authority that the liturgical reform is irreversible," wants to tell us the only direction in which we are joyfully called to direct our commitment as Pastors.

We entrust to Mary, Mother of the Church, our service to "preserve the unity of the spirit through the bond of peace" (Eph 4: 3).

From the headquarters of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, on 4 December 2021, the 58th anniversary of the promulgation of the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy Sacrosanctum Concilium .

✠ Arthur Roche
Prefect

 

The Supreme Pontiff Francis, in the course of an audience granted to the Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments on 18 November 2021, was informed and gave his consent to the publication of these RESPONSA AD DUBIA with attached NOTES EXPLANATORY .

 

 Traditionis custodes

 Art. 3. Episcopus, in dioecesibus ubi adhuc unus vel plures coetus celebrant secundum Missale antecedens instaurationem years 1970:

 [...]

 § 2. statuat unum vel plures locos ubi fideles, qui his coetibus adhaerent, convenire possint ad Eucharistiam celebrandam (nec autem in ecclesiis paroecialibus nec novas paroecias personales erigens);   

 

To the question proposed:

Where there is no possibility of identifying a church or oratory or chapel available to welcome the faithful who celebrate with the Missale Romanum ( editio typica 1962), the diocesan Bishop can ask the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments for dispensation from disposition of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes (art. 3 § 2), and, therefore, to allow the celebration in the parish church?

Answer:

Affirmatively.

Explanatory note.

The Motu proprio Traditionis custodes in art. 3 § 2 requests that the Bishop, in dioceses in which up to now there is the presence of one or more groups celebrating according to the Missal prior to the 1970 reform, "indicate one or more places where the faithful adhering to these groups can gather for the Eucharistic celebration (but not in parish churches and without erecting new personal parishes) ". The exclusion of the parish church means that the Eucharistic celebration according to the previous rite, being a concession limited to the aforementioned groups, is not part of the ordinary life of the parish community.

This Congregation, exercising the authority of the Holy See for the matter within its competence (cf. Traditionis custodes , n. 7), can grant, at the request of the diocesan Bishop, that the parish church be used for the celebration according to the Missale. Romanum of 1962 only if it is ascertained the impossibility of using another church, oratory or chapel. The assessment of this impossibility must be made with scrupulous attention.

Furthermore, this celebration is not appropriate for it to be included in the timetable of parish Masses as it is attended only by the faithful adhering to the group. Finally, it should be avoided that there is concomitance with the pastoral activities of the parish community. It is understood that when another location becomes available, this license will be withdrawn.

In these provisions there is no intention to marginalize the faithful who are rooted in the preceding celebratory form: they have only the purpose of remembering that it is a concession to provide for their good (in view of the common use of the only lex orandi of the Roman Rite) and not an opportunity to promote the previous rite.

Traditionis custodes

Art. 1. Liturgical books promulgated a sanctis Pontificibus Paulo VI and Ioanne Paulo II, iuxta decreta Vatican Council II, unica expressio “legis orandi” Ritus Romani sunt.

Art. 8. Normae, dispositiones, concessiones et consuetudines antecedentes, quae conformes non sint cum harum Litterarum Apostolicarum Motu Proprio datarum praescriptis, abrogantur.    

To the question proposed:

Is it possible, in accordance with the provisions of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes , to celebrate the Sacraments with the Ritual Romanum and the Pontificale Romanum preceding the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council?

Answer:

Negatively.

Only to canonically erected personal parishes which, according to the provisions of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes , celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962, the diocesan bishop is authorized to grant the license to use only the Ritual Romanum (ultima editio typica 1952) and not the Pontifical Romanum preceding the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council.

Explanatory note.

The Motu proprio Traditionis custodes wants to re-establish in the whole Church of the Roman Rite a single and identical prayer that expresses its unity, according to the liturgical books promulgated by the Holy Pontiffs Paul VI and John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of the Second Vatican Council and in in line with the tradition of the Church.

The diocesan Bishop, as moderator, promoter and guardian of the whole liturgical life, must work to ensure that his diocese returns to a unitary celebratory form (cf. Pope Francis, Letter to the Bishops of the whole world to accompany the text of the Motu Proprio " Traditionis custodes ") .

This congregation, exercising, for matters within its competence, the authority of the Holy See (cf. traditionis custodes , n. 7), believes that, wanting to advance in the direction indicated by the Motu Proprio, we should not grant permission to use the Ritual Romanum and the Pontificale Romanum preceding the liturgical reform, liturgical books which, like all previous norms, instructions, concessions and customs, have been abrogated (cf. Traditionis custodes , n. 8).

Only to canonically erected personal parishes which, according to the provisions of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes , celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962, the diocesan bishop is authorized to grant the license to use only the Ritual Romanum (ultima editio typica 1952) and not the Pontifical Romanum preceding the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council. It should be remembered that the formula for the Sacrament of Confirmation was changed for the whole Latin Church by Saint Paul VI with the Apostolic Constitution Divinæ consortium naturæ (August 15, 1971).

This provision intends to underline the need to clearly affirm the direction indicated by the Motu Proprio which sees in the liturgical books promulgated by the Holy Pontiffs Paul VI and John Paul II, in accordance with the decrees of the Second Vatican Council, the only expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite (cf. Traditionis custodes , n. 1).

In implementing the provisions, care should be taken to accompany those who are rooted in the previous celebratory form towards a full understanding of the value of the celebration in the ritual form given to us by the reform of the Second Vatican Council, through an adequate formation that makes it possible to discover how it is a witness to a faith. unchanged, expression of a renewed ecclesiology, primary source of spirituality for the Christian life.

Traditionis custodes

Art. 3. Episcopus, in dioecesibus ubi adhuc unus vel plures coetus celebrant secundum Missale antecedens instaurationem years 1970:

§ 1. certior fiat coetus illos auctoritatem ac legitimam naturam instaurationis liturgicae, normarum Vatican Council II Magisteriique Summorum Pontificum non excludere;       

To the question proposed:

In the event that a presbyter who has been granted the use of the Missale Romanum of 1962 does not recognize the validity and legitimacy of the concelebration - refusing to concelebrate, in particular, in the Chrism Mass - can he continue to take advantage of this concession?

Answer:

Negatively.

However, before revoking the concession to use the Missale Romanum of 1962, the Bishop should take care to establish a fraternal confrontation with the priest, to ensure that this attitude does not exclude the validity and legitimacy of the liturgical reform, of the dictates of the Second Vatican Council. and of the Magisterium of the Supreme Pontiffs and to accompany him towards the understanding of the value of concelebration, in particular in the Chrism Mass.

Explanatory note.

Art. 3 § 1 of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes asks the diocesan Bishop to ascertain that the groups that ask to celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962 "do not exclude the validity and legitimacy of the liturgical reform, of the dictates of the Second Vatican Council and of the Magisterium of the Supreme Popes ".

St Paul strongly reminds the community of Corinth to live unity as a necessary condition for being able to participate in the Eucharistic table (cf. 1 Cor 11: 17-34).

In the Letter sent to the Bishops of the whole world to accompany the text of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes, the Holy Father expresses himself thus: "Since" liturgical celebrations are not private actions, but celebrations of the Church, which is the sacrament of unity "(cf. Sacrosanctum Concilium n.26 ), must be done in communion with the Church. The Second Vatican Council, while reaffirming the external bonds of incorporation into the Church - the profession of faith, of the sacraments, of communion -, affirmed with Saint Augustine that it is a condition for salvation to remain in the Church not only "with the body", but also "with the heart" (cf. Lumen Gentium n. 14) ».

The explicit desire not to participate in the concelebration, in particular in the Chrism Mass, seems to express a lack both of acceptance of the liturgical reform and of ecclesial communion with the Bishop, necessary requisites to be able to take advantage of the concession to celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962.

However, before revoking the concession to use the Missale Romanum of 1962, the Bishop should offer the priest the time necessary for a sincere discussion on the deepest reasons that lead him not to recognize the value of concelebration, in particular in the Mass presided over by the Bishop, inviting him to live in the eloquent gesture of concelebration that ecclesial communion which is a necessary condition for being able to participate in the table of the Eucharistic sacrifice.

Traditionis custodes

Art. 3. Episcopus, in dioecesibus ubi adhuc unus vel plures coetus celebrant secundum Missale antecedens instaurationem years 1970:

[...]

§ 3. constituat, in loco statuto, dies quibus celebrationes eucharisticae secundum Missale Romanum a sancto Ioanne XXIII anno 1962 promulgatum permittuntur. His in celebrationibus, lectiones proclamentur lingua vernacula, adhibitis Sacrae Scripturae translationibus ad usum liturgicum ab unaquaque Conferentia Episcoporum approbatis;     

To the question proposed:

In the Eucharistic celebration with the use of the Missale Romanum of 1962, is it possible to use the complete text of the Bible for the readings by choosing the pericopes indicated in the same Missal?

Affirmatively.

Explanatory note.

Art. 3 § 3 of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes establishes that the readings are proclaimed in the vernacular language, using the translations of Sacred Scripture for liturgical use, approved by the respective Episcopal Conferences.

Since the texts of the readings are contained in the Missal itself and therefore the book of the Lectionary does not exist, in order to observe the provisions of the Motu Proprio, one must necessarily have recourse to the book of Sacred Scripture in the translation approved by the individual Episcopal Conferences for liturgical use, choosing the pericopes indicated in the 1962 Missale Romanum .

No publication of Lectionaries in the vernacular that reports the cycle of readings of the previous rite may be authorized.

It should be remembered that the current Lectionary is one of the most precious fruits of the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council. The publication of the Lectionary in addition to overcoming the "plenary" form of the Missale Romanum of 1962 to return to the ancient tradition of the individual books corresponding to the individual ministries, realizes what is hoped for in Sacrosanctum Concilium at n. 51: "In order that the table of the word of God be prepared for the faithful with greater abundance, the treasures of the Bible should be opened more widely so that, in a determined number of years, most of the Holy Scripture is read to the people".

Traditionis custodes

Art. 4. Presbyteri ordinati post has Litteras Apostolicas Motu Proprio datas promulgatas, celebrate volentes iuxta Missale Romanum anno 1962 editum, petitionem formalem Episcopo dioecesano mittere debent, here, ante concessionm, a Sede Apostolica licentiam rogabit.    

To the question proposed:

Does the diocesan Bishop have to be authorized by the Apostolic See to be able to grant to priests ordained after the publication of the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes to celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962 (cf. Traditionis custodes n. 4)?

Answer:

Affirmatively.

Explanatory note.

The Latin text (official reference text) in art. 4 reads as follows: "Presbyteri ordinati post has Litteras Apostolicas Motu Proprio datas promulgatas, celebrate volentes iuxta Missale Romanum anno 1962 editum, petitionem formalem Episcopo dioecesano mittere debent, here, before concession, a Sede Apostolica licentiam rogabit".

This is not a simple consultative opinion, but a necessary authorization given to the diocesan Bishop by the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, which exercises the authority of the Holy See for the matter within its competence ( cf. Traditionis custodes , n. 7).

Only having received this license will the diocesan Bishop be able to authorize priests ordained after the publication of the Motu Proprio (July 16, 2021) to celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962.

This norm is intended to offer help to the diocesan Bishop in evaluating this request: his discernment will be taken into due consideration by the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments.

The Motu Proprio clearly expresses the will that the one contained in the liturgical books promulgated by the Holy Pontiffs Paul VI and John Paul II be recognized as the only expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite, in conformity with the decrees of the Second Vatican Council: it is therefore absolutely It is desirable that priests ordained after the publication of the Motu Proprio share this desire of the Holy Father.

Wishing with solicitude to walk in the direction indicated by Pope Francis, all seminary formators are encouraged to accompany future deacons and presbyters in understanding and experiencing the richness of the liturgical reform desired by the Second Vatican Council: it has been able to value every element of the Roman Rite and favored - as wished by the Council Fathers - the full, conscious and active participation of the whole People of God in the liturgy (cf. Sacrosanctum Concilium n. 14), primary source of authentic Christian spirituality.

Traditionis custodes

Art. 5. Presbyteri, qui iam secundum Missale Romanum anno 1962 editum celebrant, ab Episcopo dioecesano licentiam rogabunt ad hanc facultatem servandam.         

To the question proposed:

Can the right to celebrate with the use of the 1962 Missale Romanum be granted ad tempus?

Answer:

Affirmatively.

Explanatory note.

The choice of granting the use of the 1962 Missale Romanum for a defined time - of the duration that the diocesan Bishop deems appropriate - is not only possible but also recommended: the end of the defined period offers the possibility of verifying that everything is in harmony. with the orientation established by the Motu Proprio. The outcome of this verification may provide the reasons for extending or suspending the concession.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To the question proposed:

Is the faculty of celebrating with the use of the Missale Romanum of 1962 granted by the diocesan bishop valid only for the territory of his diocese?

Answer:

Affirmatively.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To the question proposed:

In case of absence or impossibility of the authorized priest, must the person replacing him also have a formal authorization?

Answer:

Affirmatively.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To the question proposed:

Do the deacons and ministers instituted who participate in the celebration with the use of the Missale Romanum of 1962 have to be authorized by the diocesan bishop?

Answer:

Affirmatively.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To the question proposed:

Can a priest authorized to celebrate with the Missale Romanum of 1962, which because of his office (parish priest, chaplain, ...) also celebrates on weekdays with the Missale Romanum of the reform of the Second Vatican Council, can combine using the Missale Romanum of 1962?

Answer:

Negatively.

Explanatory note.

The parish priest or chaplain who - in the fulfillment of his office - celebrates on weekdays with the current Missale Romanum , the only expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite, cannot combine celebrating with the Missale Romanum of 1962, either with a group or privately .

It is not possible to grant the bination due to the fact that the case of the "just cause" or "pastoral necessity" required by can. 905 § 2: the right of the faithful to the Eucharistic celebration is in no way denied since the possibility of participating in the Eucharist in the current ritual form is offered.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To the question proposed:

Can a presbyter authorized to celebrate with the 1962 Missale Romanum celebrate with the same Missal on the same day for another group of faithful who have received the authorization?

Answer:

Negatively.

Explanatory note.

It is not possible to grant the bination due to the fact that the case of the "just cause" or "pastoral necessity" required by can. 905 § 2: the right of the faithful to the Eucharistic celebration is is in no way denied since the possibility of participating in the Eucharist in the current ritual form is offered.

Irish Politicians Vote for Maximum Pain for Aborted Babies

Irish politicians hit a new low this evening, by celebrating Christmas with a vote to make sure that babies will feel as much pain as possible while they are being aborted.

In a sick and sadistic development, Irish politicians, including many from Sinn Fein, openly mocked the idea of administering pain relief to babies as they were being killed in abortion.

The bill had been brought forward by a number of prolife TDs including Carol Nolan, who spoke of the fact that many liberal TDs will vote for banning cruelty to animals but not to unborn babies. The government ultimately blocked it with 107 votes against 37.

Another TD, Michael Collins, also pointed out the need for pain relief as many babies feel severe pain as they are being killed by needle or forceps.

Danny Healy Rae spoke movingly of how society lets babies down by having them killed in the womb. He also rightfully pointed out that those who support abortion were also part of governments that made life a living hell for mothers and fathers.

We need to do more to help mothers, and fathers, indeed, to ensure there is another way. We are not doing that. Many here were hell-bent on ensuring that the abortion legislation went through. That was their right and for those who voted for it that was their right. But that is not to say that I say it is right. I think that these children, if they grew up, and they do grow up and they are not long becoming men and women, would have been a massive asset to this country. The Government, by its amendment, is looking to delay this. I want to remind the Minister that 18 babies are being aborted daily so they are going to suffer pain. It is 126 weekly and over 6,000 in a year. Surely we should not be wasting time. Is there humanity in the Minister or any of the Government? If there is, now is the time to stand up and do what we ask which is just to administer pain relief in the course of these abortions where we are ending little babies lives.

Michael Healy Rae followed the same line of argument, stating:

How could any human being look me straight in the eye and say with any conviction and with any honesty in his heart and soul that it is wrong to want to stop a little person of feeling pain? Every one of us will have to die and how a person could face God after denying a person the right to pain relief is hard to understand. If I was under any one of their whips tonight, I would crack the whip back at them and I would vote with my conscience.

In a typically disgusting display from Sinn Fein, fresh from imposing Westminster’s abortion of disabled Irish babies in the North, David Cullinane stated that he wants the South to also be under London’s abortion jurisdiction:

Sinn Féin is committed to delivering the same services, North and South. We want to see the alignment and delivery of abortion services across the island, and the services available in this State implemented in the North.

We would include some of the other statements supporting babies being aborted with maximum pain, but they were of such low quality, of the kinds of American Lite soundbite clichéd talking points that we dare not waste your time or your brain cells reading the words of people who have no idea of what they are talking about.

We will give one risible example of the low quality of debate, from Ivana Bacik, of pro IMF party Labour:

We will update when we have the full list of those who voted against the measure, but you may notice the name on the teller for the Yes side, Jack Chambers, who was once a stalwart of the prolife movement and who still has the loyalty of many ‘Catholic’ voters.

Sinn Fein Votes Against Babies With Disabilities

Sinn Fein have sent a strong Christmas message to people with disabilities, by voting to ensure that they can be aborted at up to 40 weeks of pregnancy if they have Down Syndrome, a cleft palate or club foot.

The party have become radicalised in their work as enforcers of Britain’s abortion edict in Northern Ireland, a law for which they accepted British rule in the province for the first time in history.

In a vote last night, Sinn Fein continued to add controversy to their already controversial festive season by having 26 MLAs vote loud and strong against proposals to limit abortions on babies who have disabilities.

So called ‘human rights’ group Amnesty International expressed their satisfaction with the gruesome result, which will inevitably lead to essentially the elimination of peoples with Down Syndrome in the North of Ireland as it has done in everywhere else where it has been introduced.

There is simply no doubt about it, Sinn Fein want Ireland in the Commonwealth, they want the 12th of July to be a celebration of anti Catholicism from Belfast to Cork and they want little Irish babies to be killed in the womb because Britain ordered them to do it. To support Sinn Fein now means to oppose an Irish Republic, the Catholic faith and people with disabilities.

In a news story by the BBC last year, one mother of a child with Down Syndrome spoke of how she was offered 15 abortions to kill her baby, but that she was offered no support in order to have him and to raise him.

This is what Sinn Fein have voted for, all in their desperate efforts to do the work of Westminster.

Down's syndrome: 'In all honesty we were offered 15 terminations' - BBC News

Police Supervise French Mass After Beheading Threats

A recent terrorist incident in Nanterre, France has shaken the Catholic world.

The violent Islamist attack on a Marian Procession has barely made a dent in the secular media however, with mainstream European news outlets refusing to carry the story of torches being swiped from faithful, a priest being spat on by Islamists and threats to decapitate Catholics in the name of the Quran.

Now, images have emerged of Mass in the town being supervised by police as the threats were eerily similar to events in recent years in Normandy and Nice, where a priest and parishioners had their heads severed from their bodies during Mass.

To their credit, a number of Muslim groups have done what President Emmanuel Macron is refusing to do and have condemned the terrorism against Catholics.

Social Media ROASTS Irish Journalist's Bishop Tweet

The frosty relationship between Irish Catholics and the Irish State’s Propaganda Arm has grown ever colder over the course of the past year. As a result, listenership at RTE has completely collapsed.

Much of this stems from the station’s decision to use public monies to accuse Catholics of worshipping a ‘rapist God’ in a New Year’s Eve ‘comedy’ sketch.

In a tweet this week, Education Correspondent Emma O’Kelly reminded people of the occasion when principals ‘defied’ bishops by forcing children to attend school on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception.

Perplexed by the apparent cheerleading of forcing children to attend school rather than take a day off with their families and attend church, Twitter users from around the globe expressed bewilderment with the Irish psyche, with many sarcastically stating that the bishops must have been really terrible to express a desire to give kids a day off from school.

Some of those commenting including author Sohrab Ahmari, who wrote ‘Big L for Ireland’.

French Catholic Procession Attacked by Islamists

French Catholicism has hit the headlines in many different ways over the past number of weeks.

There has been the scandal involving the Archbishop of Paris who has now resigned, there has been the proposed wreckovation of Notre Dame and there was also the protest against a secular concert at a church in Nantes.

Now, a far more sinister story has emerged from Nanterre.

A number of Catholics were attending a Marian Procession in the town when a large group of Muslim men attacked them.

The Muslims shut down the event, screaming ‘THIS IS THE LAND OF ALLAH, ON THE QURAN I WILL SLIT YOUR THROAT!’ echoing the recent martyrdom of Father Jacques Hamyl in Normandy in 2016 and three Catholics in Nice last year.

The details of the attack were released in a Twitter thread belonging to an account which has since been deleted, apparently due to threats.

Twitter user Nicolas Phillippe wrote:

Today we celebrated the immaculate conception in our parish of Fontenelles in Nanterre. For the occasion, a short procession of 1km is organized in the evening with the statue of the blessed virgin as well as songs to the virgin

After only a hundred meters, for our first stop, we began to be insulted by passers-by. Then several young men began to surround us, in total a big dozen, who sneered while insulting us

Then sneers followed increasingly violent insults "children of whores", "gang of whores",then increasingly Christiannophobic words "here is not a cathedral", "you are khouffars of disbelievers", "break you are not at home" 

Faced with the hostility of these young people, it was decided to continue the procession route. There, they get closer to us, the insults become more and more violent, and it spits on the ground in our direction.

The father is attacked first being at the head of the procession. He gets spat on, then thrown cold water. The tension rises, and the group that surrounded us comes into contact. "wallah on the Qur'an I'm going to slit your throat." 

The father explains that it is a procession dedicated to the virgin. Nothing to do, "this is the land of Allah, break yourself". Other words are spoken in Arabic, while several parishioners are violently jostled by these young

We were followed and insulted for almost the entire duration of the procession, under infamous words, which were covered by songs to the virgin. In the end, calm only returned when we returned to the Church, where a police patrol was waiting for us because alerted

No one was injured, but the parishioners were shocked by this inexplicable violence towards a simple procession that was done in a good mood, authorized in the prefecture and on a classic course. The hatred in their eyes was there, without being able to explain it.

Honestly, the climate is very heavy, and it is more and more complicated, even dangerous, to be a Christian in certain territories. I am not trying to take pity only to explain the verbal and physical violence that Christians in France face

Most of the shocking details were confirmed today by the diocese’s social media:

A Marian procession took place at Hauts de Seine prefecture

During this march were planned two stops. During the first stop the procession was taken to task by several people who uttered insults and coarse and violent threats. The torch of a devotee was snatched and thrown on the participants. The procession started again and continued to be joined by the police until Saint Marie des Fontenelles. A complaint is about to be filed. The Diocese has contacted the public authorities so that the public so that the security of legitimately iniquitous faithful is fully assured now and in the future.

With the French Presidential Election currently focusing on the disparate nature of French society, priests being spat on by Muslim gangs threatening to slit the throats of Catholics carrying statues of Our Lady can only add more urgency to the need to solve France’s broken identity.