Huge Crowds Attend Polish Prolife Rally

With sustained efforts from George Soros, the United States of America and Ireland to deplete their commitment to pro family policies, Poland’s prolife lobby showed defiance this week by marching for life in Warsaw.

Recent prolife successes in the face of unrelenting pressure from outside forces have bought the prolife movement there some time, with the rise of other pro family regimes in Eastern Europe terrifying anti family governments such as Ireland’s, who are worried such policies will encourage their own citizens to look for fairer tax regimes.

The event was attended by figures from the worlds of religion, politics and activism.

Popular Polish priest Fr. Dominik Chmielewski presided over Mass for the event and spoke to those in attendance on the importance of building a culture of life.

Speaking at the event also was Archbishop Marek Jędraszewski, who spoke of his disappointment that the once optimistic European project had now been hijacked by extremists who wished to deChristianise Europe and to destroy the family in the process.

President Andrej Duda also attended, in a move that will enrage the international abortion industry. They called in every favour possible from their friends in the media to try to discredit Duda after he played a role in the banning of eugenicist abortion.

Blessed Cardinal Wyszynski was mentioned by many who spoke at the event, with his opposition to the Communism of the East now mirrored by the totalitarianism of pro eugenics forces from the West, specifically in the EU and USA.

With this year’s events scaled back due to the lockdown crisis, it is hoped that the nationwide march can resume next year.

Notre Dame Rebuilding Begins ahead of 2024 Reopening

In 2019, Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris spontaneously combusted during the most virulent wave of arson attacks on Catholic churches in French history.

Since then, architects have worked at trying to make sure that the building was stable before attempting to begin their restoration work. They have announced this week that that time has finally come, with such work set to begin immediately ahead of a 2024 reopening.

Despite the best efforts of many Modernists to ensure an iconoclastic wreckovation which would have mutated the historic cathedral into some grotesque novelty, decency has prevailed and the church will be restored with its original design.

The restoration will also use the same types of oak trees which were used in the original.

Although this was a disaster, the powerful image of French Catholics praying and singing the Rosary outside their fallen church was one which travelled around the world. With God’s grace, a reopening in 2024 can be such a moment of unity also.

Poland Tightens Laws on Sunday Trade

In 2018, the Polish parliament banned most traders from opening on Sundays.

However, the pro family law was undermined by a loophole which allowed some large outlets to remained open.

The loophole permitted retail outlets to stay open if they fulfilled certain conditions, which were often easily met by bending rules.

A new law passed yesterday in the Polish Parliament however, will now exclude them from opening unless postal services make up the majority of their business. In many cases this means that they will not be able to open up.

Sunday trading is damaging to families, in terms of time spent with their children since they will have to work in many cases, but also in terms of faith.

The expectation that Sundays are for sport and shopping is one that has severely impacted the quality of life for many families. While many European nations pride themselves as progressive for entertaining the possibility of four day working weeks and other concepts like state funded childcare.

Why not just go straight to the common sense option and have a five day working week, with Sunday trading regulated so as to allow families to spend more time with one another?

Prolifers are often accused (even by one another) of failing to offer foolproof solutions for improving daily family life. This idea is one which will be universally popular and universally productive.

Apart from with the large corporations who may feel that they miss out financially, but thankfully for them they have the likes of Anthony Blinken and Samantha Power to fight their corner against Polish families.

Assisted Suicide: At What Cost to the UK?

The Assisted Dying Bill 2021 is before the House of Lords and the British Medical Association has just voted for a “position of neutrality on assisted dying, including physician-assisted dying.” (The BMA is the largest union of British doctors.)

This Bill tasks doctors with the assessments, provision of poison, supervision of ingestion and supervision of the death of the terminally ill person. The BMA’s position is akin to the Taliban claiming they are “neutral” on women’s rights!       

The BMA vote was painfully close — 49% voted FOR neutrality; 48% AGAINST, and 3% abstained.

Credit must be given to those who voted, because both sides have a profound empathy for the dying. That said, there can be little respect for the eight delegates who abstained.

The first cost is to the honour of British Medical Association which may have abrogated almost 200 years of Hippocratic principle on the basis of a handful of abstentions. This perfectly-timed coup means that there is radically less opposition from the medical profession as Bill-13 [HL] comes for the Second Reading in the House of Lords. Ireland has shown that opposition to Assisted Suicide legislation can be effective.

Regular, non-assisted Suicide

If there is a single concrete argument against Assisted Suicide [AS] it is the increase in regular, non-assisted suicide. There has been over 30% increase in regular suicides in the Netherlands since Euthanasia was legalized there in 2001. Similarly, there are more suicides in those US States which legalised Assisted Suicide.    

By 2023 it will be legal for Canadian doctors and Nurse Practitioners to euthanise patients suffering from mental illnesses alone. All together this means that decades of suicide prevention are being flushed away.

Please listen to Lia (Garifalia) Milousis tell her poignant story in the video below. Imagine what might happen to a 2023 version of Lia.


“I’m the future version of myself who survived to tell you this.”

 The media tout AS & Voluntary Euthanasia [VE] as the “strong” and “compassionate” thing to do. This is likely to lead to “suicide contagion”: the Werther Syndrome. I believe we have a responsibility to prevent someone from taking their life out of despair — not to help them do it.

Family, Friends & Community

There must be a profound sense of abandonment and loss felt by the children who are left to pick up the pieces. “Mum didn’t love me…” or, “I should had loved her more…” It will be years before we can truly assess such trauma. This trauma is likely to affect future relationships and increase regular & assisted suicide.

We have no longitudinal evidence about how AS affects family members, friends and their community. The rationalisation that “death is a private matter” can only apply to a hermit living in some desolate place, devoid of all human contact.

The disabled, the handicapped & the mentally challenged

Baroness Hale noted that “Democracy is founded on the principle that each individual has equal value. Treating some as automatically having less value than others not only causes pain and distress to that person, but also violates his or her dignity as a human being.”

Many disabled individuals have voiced their concern that they may be coerced or put under duress to accept AS, simply because it is more “cost-effective.” This happened to Canadian Roger Foley who suffers from a progressive neurological illness. He wanted to live at home but was offered AS/VE as an alternative to forced discharge or $1,800 per day charge. (He found basic home-care services inadequate for his needs.)

Palliative Care

Palliative Care will suffer when accountants see the costs of treatment versus the cheaper AS. In time the funding for ‘expensive’ palliative programs will be reduced, which in turn will drive more people to seek Assisted Suicide.

It is telling that Medical Assistance in Dying [AS/VE] in Canada is perceived to be “a Right” and is now provided universally…while palliative-care is not.

Society

The devaluation of human life means that people will be perceived as objects. That always ends badly. This leads to the acceptance of eugenics; torture; involuntary euthanasia; capital punishment, etc.

(Editor: It might be worthwhile for readers to reflect on Britain’s role in the torture in Abu Ghraib, the torture there and the denials by Blair are evocative of the moral culpability for coercive assisted suicide The greatest moral failure of Tony Blair's premiership | Andrew Rawnsley | The Guardian )

 

Abu Ghraib (2004) under the Bush administration.

 

We can see this dehumanisation creeping into attitudes towards even political opponents; Climate-Deniers; etc.  As Daniel Goody said, ‘Human beings, have by their very existence, inherent value, worth, and distinction.’

 Demographic Death-Knell

Most western countries have birth rates which are already way below replacement levels. A terminally ill person receiving AS will only change demographics very slightly. That calculation will change completely in Canada when younger people are euthanised for non-terminal conditions.  

Health Care Workers

Caring people will leave the medical & nursing professions when they are forced to participate in a morally and ethically offensive act.

The Bill does not recommend or mandate any psychological testing for providers. In Canada, many doctors only performed one or two cases before giving up completely. Many noted an existential crisis from the killing of another human being.

The Bill does not require psychological testing of the curious few who continue to provide AS regularly. Convicted murderers, UK’s Harold Frederick Shipman and American Jack Kevorkian (“Dr. Death”) would really be in their element with legal Assisted Suicide!

Involuntary Euthanasia

In time, Health Care will attract the sociopaths who relish an ability to kill patients: some might graduate to Involuntary Euthanasia. (The killing of a patient without consent: a.k.a. murder.)

Medical Ethics

Others can better describe the damage AS/VE is causing to medical ethics and conscientious objection (noting: Ontario’s “effective referral” requirement.)

The British Medical Journal is published by the BMA and the Journal of Medical Ethics is a subsidiary of the BMJ. The JME published: “After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?” by Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva in 2011. Giubilini and Minerva suggested that infanticide (“after-birth abortion”) is ethical. This sort of tripe has been fed to BMA members over many, many years so is it any surprise they have lost their way?

Medical Education

Medical students are being taught how to kill patients before knowing how to heal properly in the first place. This means that in Canada MAiD [AS/VE] has become a regular therapeutic option.

Humanist Dr. Donald Boudreau of McGill University, said “My personal belief is that healing and euthanizing are simply not miscible.” It is only a matter of time before job requirements specify the need for applicants to provide AS/VE in all Geriatric, Palliative-Care & Family Medicine (etc.) positions. 

Please listen to Dr. Leonie Herx’s succinct comments as she reviews the issues in Canada in the video below. She is a palliative-care physician, Division Chair of Queen’s Palliative Medicine & Past-President of the Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians.

 

Human Rights

There is an open season on the Right to Life throughout the developed world.

The Supreme Court of Canada redefined the ‘Right to Life’ to mean some Canadians have the “Right to Die.” Unbelievably the SCC also gave this select group of Canadians the legal right to demand their death at the hand of another citizen (VE.) As human beings we have free will — the Freedom — to kill ourselves. There is no Right to kill ourselves (and definitely we do not have a Right to require some other person to kill us.)

International Relations

The Assisted Dying Bill allows the UK to kill citizens of other countries! That might cost dearly if a country like the People’s Republic of China objects to their citizens being killed.

 

The Slippery Slope

Look at what has happened in the Netherlands and Canada already.

In Canada euthanasia for mental illness will be legal by 2023.

In the Netherlands euthanasia for infants was illegal but occurred for many years under the tacitly accepted Groningen Protocol. There are many other egregious examples of non-compliance with the Dutch legislation.

 

Conclusion

If introduced, Assisted Suicide will cost the UK dearly.

That said, take heart from the Irish experience. Strong opposition can succeed!

 

 

Dr. Kevin Hay MRCPI MRCGP (inactive) FCFP

 

Kevin was born in the UK, graduated from UCD and now works as a Specialist Family Physician in rural Alberta, Canada. You can follow him on Twitter @kevinhay77.

'So many children!' Pope Praises Orban's Policies

Despite a witch hunt from American media outlets and their imitators in the Irish media, Pope Francis’s recent meeting with prolife Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban was a success.

Western outlets who advocate for abortion and low birth rates, lack of housing and for lower wages were disgusted that Pope Francis was entertaining someone who wanted to help families to earn a living and to grow.

As journalists tried to draw him into condemning Hungary’s new education laws and the country’s lack of cooperation with efforts by Samantha Power of the United States of America to determine European migration policies, Francis instead drew attention to the large families in Hungary’s growing population.

He defended Hungary from attacks by the European Union and made veiled references to the types of extremism that are currently emanating from the likes of Ursula Von Der Leyen and Irish politicians like Fiona O’Loughlin and Maria Walsh, the latter of whom recently landed in Budapest to march in a parade that was designed to put pressure on the government.

Francis promised to return to Hungary as soon as possible, supporting Hungary against ‘non European’ countries who are trying to use the EU to further their own ideals.

Well, thank you, thank you very much. At the beginning it was not well understood: "But you are coming only for the ceremony, and you aren't going to visit us Hungarians? And some people thought badly. No: I explained that a visit had already been planned -- it was in mind -- to Slovakia and the other began after. But I promised your President whom I met -- this is the third time I have met him -- I promised to see whether it will be possible to come back next year or the following one because the Hungarians have so many values. I was struck by the sense of ecumenism, for example that you have, but with a deep, deep, deep profundity. This is what hit me. In general, Europe - I always say this - must reassume the dreams of the founding fathers of the European Union. The European Union is not a gathering to get things done, there is a spirit behind the EU that Schuman, Adenauer, De Gasperi, these great men: go back there. Because there's the danger to be just a managment office, the European Union, and that is not good. It must move precisely toward mysticism, in search of Europe’s roots and bring it forward. And I think all the countries must move forward. It is true that there are some interests, perhaps not European ones, that attempt to use the European Union for ideological colonization, and this is not good. No: the European Union must be indepedent in and of itself, and all the countries on the same level, inspired by the dream of its Great Founders. This is my idea. And you Hungarians: I was with you last year [2 years ago] in Transylvania, that Mass in Hungarian was beautiful.

I received him, the President came to see me, he carried out this courtesy. It is the third time I have met him, and he came with the Prime Minister and the Deputy Minister. The President spoke. The first topic was ecology, really chapeau for you Hungarians, the ecological conscience that you have. He explained how they purify the rivers, things that I did not know. Then I asked about the average age, because I am worried about the demographic winter. In Italy the average age is 47, Spain I think is even worse, many villages are empty or with many elderly people. How can this be resolved? The president explained to me the law they have to help young couples to get married and have children. Interesting, it is a law that is quite similar to the French law, but more developed. They explained this to me, there they added something, the Prime Minister and the Vice-Minister about what this law is about. On immigration, nothing. Then we went back to ecology. The family, in the sense of demographics: you can see that there are so many young people, so many children. In Slovakia, too, there are many young couples. Now the challenge is to find jobs, so that they don't go abroad looking for them. But these were the things... The president always spoke, both ministers added some data. The meeting lasted quite a long time, about 40 minutes.

Pope Francis: 'Abortion is MURDER!'

In his latest plane interview, Pope Francis has doubled down on previous rhetoric which compared abortion ‘doctors’ to ‘hitmen’, by reiterating that abortion is murder and those who avail of it or commit it are ‘killing’.

When asked about whether pro abortion politicians should be allowed to receive Communion, Francis linked abortion to Europe’s demographic decline:

Abortion: it's more than a problem, it's murder, whoever has an abortion kills, no half words. Take any book on embryology for medical students. The third week after conception, all the organs are already there, even the DNA... it is a human life, this human life must be respected, this principle is so clear! To those who cannot understand, I would ask this question: is it right to kill a human life to solve a problem? Is it right to hire a hitman to kill a human life? Scientifically it is a human life. Is it right to take it out to solve a problem? That is why the Church is so hard on this issue, because if it accepts this it would be like accepting daily murder. A Head of State told me that the demographic decline began because in those years there was such a strong law on abortion that six million abortions were performed and this left a drop in births in the society of that country.

British Medical Association Drops Opposition to Assisted Suicide

Today, the BMA — the largest representative body/union for doctors in the UK — voted in favour of taking “a position of neutrality on assisted dying, including physician-assisted dying.”

The vote was painfully close: 49% voted FOR “neutrality” — 48% voted AGAINST, and 3% ABSTAINED. Every simpleton knows that doctors cannot possibly be “neutral” about a patient committing suicide. Doctors cannot be “neutral” when the profession is tasked to provide and supervise the poisons used by patients to kill themselves.

This decision provides enormous support for the introduction of Assisted Suicide to England and Wales (Baroness Meacher’s Bill is before the House of Lords: Scotland has their own legislation.) This vote will be used to brainwash the British people that AS is “just fine.” It will be used to bully politicians into voting in favour of the Bill.

The psychological persuasion will come in many forms. Humans are social creatures and one of the easiest forms of persuasion is the ‘Asch Conformity Syndrome’ which has been shown to work repeatedly in group dynamics. (Also, once Assisted Suicide has been introduced, it will be a small step to add Voluntary Euthanasia.)

The Nazi propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels described “The Big Lie”:

If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.

All is not lost

This is a devastating blow: but Britain has been in a pickle before! Two countries can provide good example for the UK.

The Canada Medical Association also voted to be “neutral.” That allowed the legalization of Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia in Canada without any coordinated opposition. Since 2016 many of the initial tight restrictions have been removed and by 2023 doctors in Canada will be able to euthanise those suffering from mental illnesses alone, legally. The lesson from Canada is that remaining opposition must unite and fight the introduction of Bill 13 HL — now!

The UK should take great encouragement from Ireland where the Dying with Dignity Bill 2020 failed. The Justice Committee of the Oireachtas (Ireland’s Parliament) received over 1,400 submissions which came from private citizens and professional organizations such as the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland; Irish Palliative Medicine Consultants Association; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland; Irish Society of Physicians in Geriatric Medicine; College of Psychiatrists of Ireland; Irish Healthcare Professionals for Dignity in Living and Dying, amongst others.

There are about 300,000 doctors in the UK with just over half being members of the BMA. My hope is that many will immediately resign from the BMA and join a union which opposes AS. (The next largest union is the Hospital Consultants and Specialist Association, which appears to have no stance on AS.)

For more details on the Assisted Dying Bill 2021 (Bill 13 HL) please follow the link.

Doctors and nurses must remain our patient’s advocate, counsellor, and caregiver.

We must shield our patients from coercion. We must treat suicidal patients appropriately: not kill them.

Assisted Suicide is not “end-of-life care.” It is the Ending of Life.

Dr. Kevin Hay

MRCPI MRCGP (inactive) FCFP

Kevin was born in the UK, graduated from University College Dublin and now works as a Specialist Family Physician in rural Alberta, Canada. He has been writing on Assisted Suicide & Voluntary Euthanasia for the past 5 years. You can follow him on Twitter @kevinhay77.

Will Fianna Fail Ban Prolife Prayer?

Despite still hoovering up an obscene amount of prolife and Catholic votes in each election, Ireland’s ruling Fianna Fail party have in recent months turned their ire against both groups of their base.

First there was the instruction to law enforcement to surround entire villages in order to prevent Mass from taking place earlier in the year (on the same weekend that international sport events were taking place in Dublin), then there was the legislation which rendered outdoor Confession and Communion on the tongue as illegal and finally there was the the suggestion that the party needed to become even more pro abortion in order to bring about a reversal in plummeting voter approval ratings.

The party are now seeking to turn the screw further on its Stockholm Syndrome suffering Catholic and prolife base, by banning prolife prayer near abortuaries, an almost unheard of infringement against human rights in Europe. Despite Garda Commissioner Drew Harris insisting that current legislation on public order is sufficient to deal with such vigils, a caucus led by failed Fianna Fail politician Fiona O’Loughlin is seeking to ban Catholics from praying at such venues.

The Oireachtas Women’s Caucus sent a letter to Fiona O’Loughlin, who was rejected by voters but taken care of by Fianna Fail with a Senator position, which outlined their desire to see prolife prayer vigils banned from taking place. The letter was then passed on to self avowed ‘feminist’ and Social Democrats founder Stephen Donnelly, who has stated that he is ‘fully committed’ to having prolifers and Catholics banned from praying for an end to abortion near places where babies are destroyed in the womb.

The move to get the letter published was led by members of the Green Party, who share a special bond with their ruling Fianna Fail colleagues, having weathered the storm to force the bank bailout on the Irish people in the past decade. This pro usury act of totalitarianism was a significant part of Ireland’s decade of death, which saw birth rates successfully reduced by a quarter and abortions increase to 6,000 plus a year. Both parties were recently involved in a widely criticised rule which permitted government camera crews into Maternity Hospitals during lockdown, while keeping fathers out of the building, regardless of the condition of the mother.

Anyone who has ever come across any of these prolife vigils will know that they are prayerful, quiet and unassuming. Most actually take place on the weekends when the GPs in question are not even open. The insinuation that anything untoward is taking place there is really just the guilty conscience of the Green Party and Fianna Fail nagging at them, perhaps in the knowledge that they have caused around 15,000 abortions since 2019, not to mention many more in the decade preceding thanks to their anti family cutbacks in the service of the banking system.

Catholics and the wider community of those who oppose abortion must take their vigils directly to the Dail if this ban takes place. They should also respond in kind and make sure that Fianna Fail are denied the opportunity to stage their notorious ‘church gate collections’, where anti Catholic politicians seek financial contributions from Massgoers who mindlessly fund their own persecution out of some misplaced sense of loyalty to a party that no longer exists except in name only.

The voters roundly rejected pro abortion Fianna Fail TDs in the past year and a half and it seems likely that they will continue to do so. The party appear to have chosen abortion as the issue that eventually brings about their demise and they have chosen to pummel people of faith in the process.

Like all who have tried similar in the past 2,000 years, it will be in vain.

The Largest Mass Execution in American History

1847 is known as one of the worst years of Ireland’s history, with the great number of victims of the so called ‘Great Famine’ perishing during the harsh conditions of that winter, with many emigrating and drowning at sea in the effort to do so.

‘Black 47’ as it came to be known at home, also saw Irishmen abroad suffering for their ethno religious identity, leading to Irish Catholics being the victims of the greatest mass execution in the history of the United States of America.

The USA was not at this time the entity that John F. Kennedy eventually managed to become President of, with prominent Catholics in every city and state, instead it was a primarily Anglo Protestant nativist culture which could often be hostile to the waves of peasant Irish Catholics arriving at its shores in large numbers.

This happened to coincide with antagonism towards another Catholic peoples, the Mexicans. In an effort to annex Texas, the United States under President James Polk went to war with Mexico, enlisting tens of thousands of immigrants to bolster the army, including Irish Catholics. Ulysses S. Grant would later say of the war:

For myself, I was bitterly opposed to the measure, and to this day regard the war, which resulted, as one of the most unjust ever waged by a stronger nation against a weaker nation.

Despite the good pay from the American army, some Irish Catholics quickly recognised the similarities of this struggle with their own one back home. One particular individual who saw this was John Riley, an Irish emigrant who had served and excelled in both the British and American armies. Almost as soon as war was declared, Riley defected to fight alongside his Mexican Catholic brothers. He took with him many other Irish and his own military expertise, together their battalion became known as the ‘San Patricios’, or ‘Saint Patrick’s’ Battalion.

One Mexican commander evoked Irish Catholicism as a means of appealing to potential soldiers, General Lopez De Santa Anna wrote:

The Mexican nation only looks upon you as some deceived foreigners, and hereby stretch out to you a friendly hand, offer you the felicity and fertility of their territory

Can you fight by the side of those who put fire to your temples in Boston and Philadelphia?... If you are Catholics, the same as we, if you follow the doctrines of our Saviour, why are you seen, sword in hand, murdering your brethren, why are you the antagonists of those who defend their country and your own God? You will be received under the laws of that truly Christian hospitality and good faith which Irish guests are entitled to expect and obtain from a Catholic nation

The Boston and Philadelphia ‘temples’ referred to were incidents where Anglo Protestant nativists set a number of churches and convents on fire in the previous year.


The numbers of San Patricios grew even more steady after the Battle of Monterrey, in which the American army had prepared to shell the city Cathedral.

Though small in number, their expertise was significant in the Mexican efforts, which were ultimately in vain. General Santa Anna stated that having an army composed of similar soldiers could’ve won the war. After being captured in August 1847, dozens of San Patricios faced execution. Riley escaped execution because his desertion had occurred prior to the official declaration of war. Instead, he was brutally beaten as punishment.

Irish President Michael D. Higgins with his Mexican counterpart at the memorial to the San Patricios.

Irish President Michael D. Higgins with his Mexican counterpart at the memorial to the San Patricios.

Others were not so fortunate.

Between 10th and 13th September 1847, 50 men were executed. 30 were hanged on 13th September, making it the largest mass execution in United States history.

This fight was a type of precursor to the 20th Century Cristero War, where the Anglo Protestant forces of Freemasonry and the Ku Klux Klan duelled with the Knights of Columbanus (many of them Irish) and the Catholic Cristeros of Mexico.

Their battle cry could have easily been that of the San Patricios:

The Virgin Mary is our protector and defender when there is to fear

She will vanquish all demons at the cry of "Long live Christ the King!"

Soldiers of Christ: Let's follow the flag, for the cross points to the army of God!

Let's follow the flag at the cry of "Long live Christ the King!"

Sanpatricioshang.jpg

Eucharistic Congress Finishes With Pope/Orban Meeting

The Eucharistic Congress 2021 has finished in the Hungarian capital of Budapest, with a large outdoor Mass with Pope Francis to cap off events.

Some of the other significant public highlights included a candlelit Eucharistic procession, attended by thousands as they passed through the Budapest streets.

As part of his trip there, Pope Francis met with Viktor Orban and discussed the future of Christianity on the continent. Orban gifted the pope with a letter from King Bela IV.

This letter had caused outrage from the American Catholic Left, who have been swift to conflate Orban with Planned Parenthood. The implication that defending your country from invasion is the same as abortion is of the type of ignorance that caused some Americans to rename ‘French Fries’ as ‘Freedom Fries’ in the early 2000s, it is the outrage at those who assert the Manifest Destiny of a nation that is always right in fighting ‘tyranny’ even when it is wrong.

Those outraged American Catholics would be better devoting their own energies to discussing the acts of their sitting Catholic president, who scorched 7 innocent children to death this past week with a drone, for no strategic or military reason. No apology, no public penance was given afterwards. The humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan should not be used as a tool by the Catholic left to attack those that they do not like, particularly when those that they have implicitly endorsed or defended are committing war crimes while attending daily Mass. To our knowledge, not a single member of the anti Orban American Catholic Left has condemned Biden’s war crime last week, which left a grieving father mourning the massacre of his 7 children.

Another important part of Eucharistic Congress events was the beatification of Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski, who lived under Communism in Poland, a pivotal figure alongside Pope John Paul II in the survival of the faith there.

Cardinal Dominik Duka, who was acquainted with the Cardinal personally, shared a photo of him praying at the blessed's tomb, a tribute to their shared survival under Communism.

The pope will travel to Slovakia today where he will also offer a public Mass.

Analysis of UK's Assisted Dying Bill 2021

A Detailed Analysis of the UK’s Assisted Dying Bill 2021  

Ignoring all irony about promoting Assisted Suicide during the pandemic, Baroness Meacher introduced a new iteration of the Assisted Dying Bill to the British House of Lords earlier this year (Bill-13 HL).

On September 14th, the British Medical Association will vote on maintaining opposition to Assisted Suicide/Voluntary Euthanasia, or whether it will change its stance to “neutral.” Obviously, any “neutral stance” from doctors is far from neutral.

This article reviews relevant sections of the Bill and comments on specific clauses from a Hippocratic view-point. 

Euphemism — not definitions

“Assisted Dying” is a Euphemism. Assisted Suicide [AS] is when a poison or overdose is legally provided to a person so they may kill themselves.

“Medicine” as used in Bill 13 is a euphemism. Medicine is used to heal and to treat: a “poison’ or ‘overdose’ is used to kill (though such terms are not acceptable to the public.)

“Attending doctor” implies there will be a normal Doctor/Patient relationship. (Patently not the case.)

(Voluntary Euthanasia [VE]: a consenting person is directly killed by another. VE is barred by Bill 13, but certain deficiencies will lead to VE.)

Preamble

The preamble is quite frank: “A Bill to enable adults who are terminally ill to be provided at their request with specified assistance to end their own life; and for connected purposes.”

Section 1: Assisted dying

Similar to most countries, two doctors are to process the request for AS. The UK is adding ante-mortem High Court approval. 

“(1) Subject to the consent of the High Court (Family Division) …

and,

(2) Subsection (1) applies only if the High Court (Family Division), by order, confirms that it is satisfied…”

The Court confirmation is likely to be a “rubber-stamp” after ensuring basic requirements have been met. That much is good — a hearing or an appeal process would be better.

The Bill requires a written request from a competent adult who, is not under duress, nor coerced and who makes: “…a voluntary, clear, settled and informed wish to end his or her own life.”

The UK should note that many of the stringent requirements in the 2016 Canadian legislation have been loosened already (radically.)

The criteria define an applicant as, “…been ordinarily resident in England and Wales for not less than one year.” Remarkably this suggests that UK has the authority to assist the suicide of people who are not even British citizens! That shows an impressive sense of dominion, which might not be shared by the relevant government (such as the People’s Republic of China, etc.)

Under Section 13 (1) “This Act extends to England and Wales only.” The zealots will push for the introduction of this legislation into Northern Ireland which will lead to ‘Suicide Tourism’ for citizens of the Republic of Ireland, some of whom are resident in the North. Certain elements might consider Britain assisting the death of Irish men and women to be…problematic.

The basis for the whole Bill pivots on the clause: “…has capacity to make the decision to end his or her own life.” In the past, the wish to end one’s own life was viewed as needing psychiatric care. There should be an appeal process for family, friends or other doctors who suspect the applicant is under duress, coercion or incapacity.

Section 2: Terminal illness

A pivotal issue in the lack definition about the ability to treat, “reverse,” or cure an illness:

“(a) has been diagnosed by a registered medical practitioner as having an inevitably progressive condition which cannot be reversed by treatment,”

and,

“(2) Treatment which only relieves the symptoms of an inevitably progressive condition temporarily is not to be regarded as treatment which can reverse that condition.”

Many cancers and other serious illnesses have substantial cure rates so the Bill needs to specify the degree to which an illness is “reversed by treatment” to be excluded under the terms above.

Most prognoses are educated guesses: the assessing doctors are likely to be pessimistic about the prognosis to help their clients meet the criterion: “(b)…is reasonably expected to die within six months.”  (Also note: the Canadian requirement for “natural death” to be “reasonably foreseeable” has been removed completely — only 5 years after the original legislation.)

Again, there should be an appeal process for the GP or specialist who disagrees with the prognosis provided by the “attending doctor/s” because Section 10 (“Offences”) could be used to silence doctors: “knowingly or recklessly provides a medical or other professional opinion in respect of B which is false or misleading in a material particular.”     

Section 3: Declaration

The restrictions on witnesses include: “…must not be a relative or directly involved in the person’s care or treatment.” Unbelievably, this allows a person to be a witness of the application/declaration even if they will profit from the death of the applicant! (e.g. a non-related beneficiary in the will.)

The “attending doctors” must declare that the applicant: “(c) has a clear and settled intention to end their own life which has been reached voluntarily, on an informed basis and without coercion or duress” Doctors are simply not trained in the identification of subtle coercion and duress. Also usually they will not report societal coercion (such as the lack of palliative care or increasing financial burdens on the family.)

Telling a person repeatedly that they are “so brave” s a form of duress when the applicant becomes unable to withdraw an application for fear of disappointing others. Organ donation can also be used as leverage: “You will save so many lives...”  

“…the attending doctor and the independent doctor must be satisfied that the person making it has been fully informed of the palliative, hospice and other care which is available to that person.” Bizarrely, there is NO requirement to have a palliative-care consultation; social-worker assessment; spiritual guidance, etc. 

One assessment is mandated: “(5) If the attending doctor or independent doctor has doubt as to a person’s capacity to make a decision…the doctor must—(a) refer the person for assessment by an appropriate specialist; and (b) take account of any opinion provided by the appropriate specialist in respect of that person.”

If there is doubt about the applicant’s capacity, the process must not proceed. The applicant should have the option of requesting a competency assessment to continue, rather than it being mandated. A mandated assessment would remove autonomy at a time when remaining autonomy is paramount.  

Cancelling the application for AS seems easy: “(7) A person who has made a declaration under this section may revoke it at any time and revocation need not be in writing” but it does not specify whom must be told, nor whether it can be through second-hand communication (e.g. from a HC provider or family member. This could put the messenger in danger of an alleged offense under 10.1.b: “wilfully conceals or destroys a declaration made under section 3 by another person.”)

Also, the Bill should specify what happens if the applicant changes their mind a second time and wishes to resume the AS process. If it does not become a new application, the wait-time may have expired.  

Section 4: Assistance in dying

There are several appropriate requirements for the delivery and supervision of the poison.  

The Bill suggests there will be a self-actuated automatic nasogastric and/or IV pump device to deliver the overdose (much like automated devices used for lethal injections in the States): “(b) prepare a medical device which will enable that person to self-administer the medicine.”

This section appropriately reiterates that: “…the final act of doing so must be taken by the person for whom the medicine has been prescribed.”

All Voluntary Euthanasia is excluded: “(5) Subsection (4) does not authorise an assisting health professional to administer a medicine to another person with the intention of causing that person’s death.” The Bill gives no direction as to what is to happen when AS fails or is complicated. (As in the person is unconscious, but not dying.) Though infrequent, this can occur and such occurrences will make for morbid tabloid news — and will be used to promote Voluntary Euthanasia.  

An excellent requirement is: “(6) The assisting health professional must remain with the person until the person has—(a) self-administered the medicine and died; or (b) decided not to self-administer the medicine.” Time of death after AS is variable, so the supervising professionals will not be able to leave at a set time. Later this too will be used to push for Voluntary Euthanasia.

The protocols for AS in Canada are very simple and could easily be administered by non-medical personnel. The main reason governments require doctors and nurses to deliver AS is to make this process “clean” and acceptable to the public.  

Section 5: Conscientious Objection

Section 5 consists of a mere three lines: “A person is not under any duty (whether by contract or arising from any statutory or other legal requirement) to participate in anything authorised by this Act to which that person has a conscientious objection.”  A similar exclusion clause was specified by the Supreme Court of Canada, yet Ontario mandates doctors to make “an effective referral” for AS/VE though the self-referral system in Alberta is working effectively.

“It is legal so you must do it…” is the justification used in Canada.

Section 6: Criminal liability

Point (1) appears as if it was meant to simply verify that the “attending doctor” will not be committing an offense under the Criminal Code. The problem is that this clause almost fully indemnifies against ALL possible criminal charges when providing “any assistance in accordance with this act.” “(1) A person who provides any assistance in accordance with this Act is not guilty of an offence.”

Section 8: (Codes of Practice) reiterates this protection: “(7) A person performing any function under this Act must have regard to any relevant provision of a code and failure to do so does not of itself render a person liable to any criminal or civil proceedings but may be taken into account in any proceedings” (the convoluted second part needs legal interpretation.)

Section 7: Inquests, death certification etc.

This Bill provides no waiver for the Life Insurances which have a suicide exclusion clause.

Section 10: Offenses.

(Comments above in Sections 2 and 3.) 

Section 13: Extent, commencement, repeal and short title

 

One of the final clauses: “(4) At any time during the period of 12 months beginning on the day 10 years after the provisions in subsection (3) come into force, this Act may be repealed by a resolution of each House of Parliament” seems to indicate that Bill 13 must be in effect for 10 years before it can be repealed by a simple resolution in each House.

Other than being wildly undemocratic, this 10-year stipulation is yet another example of the author’s zealotry in favour of Assisted Suicide.

Dr. Kevin Hay MRCPI MRCGP (inactive) FCFP

Kevin was born in the UK, graduated from UCD and now works as a Specialist Family Physician in rural Alberta, Canada.  You can follow him on Twitter: @kevinhay77.

 

Fianna Fail Think That They Need to Become More Pro Abortion

Amongst the many skin crawlingly sycophantic moments in George Soros’s propaganda film ‘The 8th’, the most cringe was the image of Micheal Martin at the end, as the Tenochtitlan celebration of sacrificing babies unfurled around him. Martin desperately attempts to get on camera to thank a major pro abortion campaigner for her role, telling her ‘congratulations’ in a degrading ploy for airtime and approval totally unbefitting a major party leader.

Prior to the Referendum on the 8th Amendment in 2018, Fianna Fail had been a safe haven for prolife voters.

In a bombshell delivered only months before the vote, Martin came out as staunchly for removing the right to life of unborn children in Ireland. This decision has led to deaths of 13,000 children since and the collapse of Ireland’s birth rate by 25%.

His betrayal was not to be the last from the party, when the Dail vote was taken later that year, many ‘prolife’ Fianna Fail TDs chose to either abstain or to actually vote to make sure that babies born alive during abortion were left to die on tables, that sex selective abortions could take place and so that disabled children could be aborted.

Since then, the party have managed to take power, but only by completely humiliating themselves in the process. They now have the office of Taoiseach, but have been repeatedly humiliated by their supposed coalition partners Fine Gael, who seem to be the tail wagging the dog. It seems increasingly unlikely that the party will have any meaningful future, having alienated its core base as well as any potential new or young voters.

According to the Irish Independent today, their solution to this is to double down on their support for aborting Irish babies.

This is a particularly bizarre solution given the fact that Fianna Fail ran an overtly pro abortion candidate in Dublin Bay South, the most pro abortion area in Ireland, and came out with a dismal 4.6 percent of the vote. By contrast, prolife candidate Mairead Toibin of Aontu managed 2.8% in the same vote, without a pro abortion electorate to work with and without the same level of media exposure as the pro abortion Fianna Fail candidate.

In fact, Fianna Fail’s most ardent supporters of Repealing the 8th Amendment were all uniformly rejected by voters post Referendum. This included Lisa Chambers, who infamously chided abortion regret as a ‘makey up thing’ that ‘does not exist’.

Chambers also strangely referred to herself as ‘prolife’ despite campaigning to remove the only legal safeguard to the rights of human beings to be born in Ireland.

Rather than listening to voters who rejected her, Fianna Fail decided to instead stick with Chambers and handed her a seat in the Seanad.

The party decided to rebuke voters by doing the same with Fiona O’Loughlin, another individual who supported Repeal but who had voters desert her for doing so.

Fianna Fail could have taken stock after the last election and realised that the only energy of note in the party was from the prolife wing, even from those were only nominally so. Instead, they have chosen to focus on supporting abortion even more and attacking Catholic countries like Poland and Hungary in crazed diatribes against their pro family policies.

Their decision to pursue the anti baby vote even further is evidence of how tired and obsolete of a party they have become. If people want pro abortion candidates, they will vote for genuine ones, not those seeking it for the sake of votes and being unashamed in doing so. The experience in the recent Dublin Bay South election should be a warning sign to them, they are not part of the pro abortion lobby and they will never be accepted as such. A number of their TDs would have gotten over the line and kept their seats at the last election were it not for the many that had been alienated by their pursuit of the pro abortion vote instead.

Many Catholics still vote for Fianna Fail for reasons of family, locality and even because they perceive the party as friendly towards the faith. Some of its members, including Social Democrats founder Stephen Donnelly, who has gone on record as saying that the church ‘has a lot to answer for’.

Many members of Fianna Fail were particularly crass towards the church during the lockdown crisis when Mass was viciously singled out, with law enforcement arriving at the doors of churches during Easter, Gardai being used to question priests about single digits of extra mourners at funerals and shrines closed off during holy days. Donnelly was heavily criticised for a document which criminalised Mass, leading to Fr. PJ Hughes in Cavan having his town surrounded by state forces under the direction of Fianna Fail in a bid to stop the celebration of the Eucharist from taking place with a number of peoples present.

At the moment, the relationship between many Catholics and Fianna Fail is one of unrequited love, many people of faith (especially rural ones) think that Fianna Fail are their guys in the Dail, while Fianna Fail are mortified to be associated with them and prefer instead to court the ever elusive cosmopolitan vote.

Those few young people who are still left in Fianna Fail must ask themselves if the humiliation of their Dublin Bay South campaign is what they want to repeat at the next election but on a bigger scale. Sadly, the answer is probably a yes and those Catholics who continue to blindly allow Fianna Fail to take their voters for granted should consider the fact that loyalty works both ways.

100 Years of the Legion of Mary

Ask an Irish person what they know about Twentieth Century Catholicism within the country and very little of it is positive.

That is the power of a media that is addicted to cursing the faith and blaming it for every ill currently plaguing the nation, even after three or four decades of obvious secular power.

By the end of the Twenty First Century, one can envision much of that negativity dissipating to make way for a more appreciative awe for the achievements of great individuals such as Frank Duff, Alphonsus Lambe and Edel Quinn. Those stalwarts of the Legion of Mary are not alone, there were also the many missionaries from the Columbans and other orders who exhibited the same bravery and faith that inhibited the soul and actions of the great saint from which they derive their name.

Starting from humble beginnings in Dublin, the Legion of Mary grew to encompass presidiums in China, South America and Africa, surviving and even thriving amongst poverty, tyranny and violence.

Frank Duff was a civil servant who had a remarkable perception of theology and of its practical implications within the world. He had worked for Michael Collins and later for WT Cosgrave during the early years of the state. The Legion of Mary may have an image of being non confrontational, but when it came to proclaiming the gospel, Duff’s zeal for apostolic work was anything but. Fr. Thomas O’Flynn C.M. wrote in his book Frank Duff As I Knew Him:

He had unflinching honesty in asserting what he believed to be the truth. Sometimes at the Pauline Circle, the ecumenical group run by the Legion, I would wince at the fortrightness with which he put forward the teaching of the church to our separated brethren. But even if they did not always agree with him they respected him for his honesty.

He was a fighter, never afraid to defend his corner when the interests of the faith or the Legion were at stake. This courage was part of the psychological gear necessary for his task. When he was launching the new movement in the lay apostolate that later became known as the Legion of Mary he had encountered opposition: sometimes from people in high places. A pioneer in any walk of life needs courage. Frank Duff had it in plenty.

Duff was largely overlooked by the hierarchy in Ireland and one can only wonder how different the history of Twentieth Century Catholicism in Ireland would have been had he been listened to.

In a talk published on the Iona Institute website, Duff’s biographer Finola Kennedy wrote of how Duff broke the norms of secular culture in trying to help unmarried mothers to gain stability in their lives, housing them in his hostel The Regina Coeli. She wrote:

Duff’s special sympathy for unmarried mothers was at odds with the mores of the time when the consequences of an extra-marital birth were disastrous, rendering both mother and child social outcasts. He was probably close to the view of the writer George Moore who in his powerful novel, Esther Waters written at the end of the nineteenth century, tells the story of a mother’s fight for the life of her illegitimate son. Moore wrote, ‘Hers is a heroic adventure if one considers it – a mother’s fight for the life of her child against all the forces that civilisation arrays against the lowly and the illegitimate’.

Anyone who has ever visited Frank Duff’s house in Dublin will notice that in his living room, one finds copies of National Geographic, travel books and encyclopedias concerning every part of the globe and various dictionaries for other languages. The inception of the Legion coincided with the birth of international travel through airplane and also the missions of Irish priests, particularly the Columbans, to the Far East and elsewhere.

One of the most famous examples of these was Fr. Aedan McGrath SSC.

In his book Navan to China, McGrath tells the story of Chinese Legionaries who exhibited profound faith as he had witnessed on countless occasions since his first arrival there in 1930. One of the most striking of these was one where he says:

Under the most trying of circumstances, the Legionaries behaved splendidly in every way. On one occasion a drunken Army Official, who was suspicious of the Praesidia meetings, wildly broke into a junior meeting when the young girls were reciting the Rosary. As he strode into the room, swearing vengeance on all and sundry, not one little head turned: the Legionaries continued their prayers uninterrupted under the leadership of the young girl President! As he surveyed the scene, the officer’s face changed completely, he removed his cap, bowed his head reverently and quietly left the room - conquered by a group of little Legionaries praying to the Mother of God!'

How proud I was of the behaviour and spirit of my Legionaries both on this occasion and at other times when bombs and shells were dropping thickly all around the Mission.

McGrath also told of how in 1946, Pope Pius XII had sent word to the Chinese church to follow the model of the Legion of Mary so as to reach millions of Chinese people with the Good News. Pius XII was not naive however and told them:

You are going to be expelled sometime and in the meantime it is vital that you build up a framework which will caretake the Church in your absence, and that instrument lies ready for you in the Legion.

The Chinese bishops became familiar with the Legion handbook as a means of educating themselves with this new tool. The Chinese Communist Party were completely terrified of the Legion of Mary, it put women into positions of authority, it had no clear centralised structure and it seemed to be spreading like wildfire. Most terrifyingly, it carried with it the name of ‘Legion’ and other Roman inspired paraphernalia.

They tried to paint the Legion as a tool of Imperialism in order to deter Chinese people from joining it.

McGrath writes:

The legion was charged with being ‘reactionary’ at several ‘accusation meetings’ convened by the city authorities. The accusations were sustained, but the ‘reasoning’ at these mass meetings followed the line that ‘foreign priests’ were influential in organising the various groups of Legionaries and since foreigners were imperialists, the Legion was therefore a tool of Imperialism.

At this point in time, the Legion had reached 90 dioceses in China. Such was the disdain towards their success, that the Chinese Communist Party referred to Frank Duff as ‘Ireland’s greatest imperialist’.

Fr. McGrath ended up being imprisoned and tortured by the Chinese Communist Party for 32 months in 1951. In his recollection of his interrogations, he talks about how the Chinese police held one meeting in a church and demanded to know about what the Legion meant by ‘conquering the world’.

The Legion grew rapidly also in Hong Kong, where it was reported that 74 presidia were in operation in 1954.

One of the core motivations for Duff to found and build the Legion of Mary was St. Louis Mary de Montfort’s True Devotion to Mary.

The Legion has three causes for canonisation, one of which was Alphonsus Lambe, who recognised the importance of De Montfort’s book when he travelled to Argentina. In her book Envoy Extraordinaire, Hilde Firtel writes:

Alfie breached a very thorny subject, namely the sentimental and unenlightened devotion to Our Lady that is occasionally found in Latin America. In Europe one hears criticism that some people have saved nothing of devotion to Catholicism save devotion to Our Lady. But this fact which is taken as true is taken as an excuse to deprecate devotion to Our Lady. This is to err in the opposite extreme.

Alfie proposed the remedy as acquainting the faithful with the ‘True Devotion’ of Saint Louis Marie De Montfort. This would give them a true picture of Our Lady’s role in God’s plan of salvation and would gradually rectify their ideas.

The centrality of De Montfort and the deep Marian spirituality of the Legion handbook are core aspects, which transmit profound theological truths to even the lay person.

Duff met a number of popes, but was largely unappreciated in his home country. Perhaps it was because of the uncomfortably prescience with which he could perceive the future for Ireland not just in spiritual terms but economic terms also:

Obviously all this constitutes a danger signal for us in Ireland. We have arrived at the point when taxation has become oppressive and We know it is going to get heavier. At what stage will it amount to a taking over of our ,entire lives by the State" Then there will be no more effort; no more initiative. An eminent man of our own times has said that it is impossible for a dishonest people to become a great nation. I would amplify this thought and say that a people which does not give value cannot hope to keep the Faith.

The mere contemplation of such a nest of problems is enough to paralyse. Solution must be attempted in a spirit of pure faith. The crisis is as great as any of the classic ones of the past. So Legionaries of Mary will, quite naturally, turn to her who is the help of Christians, the destroyer of all heresies, the woman of perpetual succour, to whom recourse has never been made unavailingly.

Duff foresaw that Ireland’s poor catechesis would eventually lead the slide towards atheism:

It has always been imagined by us that the Irish people have a unique regard for the Mass. Therefore it is a shock to encounter proofs to the contrary. I have now covered a good deal of the surface of the country and I tell you our experience in regard to daily Mass, which surely is the test of appreciation. The attendance is miserable in proportion. Yet in the smaller places there is nothing doing at that time and the majority could attend. I specify one case where we had a priest with us and offered a week-day Mass to a village which normally has one on Sunday only. Not a single local person turned up for it. Other places would be better but not much better. Does that sort of thing afford justification for our alleged love of the Mass?

Quite evidently that degree of religion is not going to stand up to the adverse influences which are every day thickening and marshalling themselves. Therefore we find ourselves at a crisis point of religion. The thought forces itself upon me: Is it possible that the tragedy of France and so many other countries is going to reproduce itself in Ireland? We are walking on a slippery slope at the moment. That cannot continue. It improves or it deteriorates-usually the latter.

It was not possible to save France. Portugal. Spain. Italy. Holland. all of which have lost the Faith in the main. Acute French observers coming here soon after the Second World War declared that they saw a remarkable likeness between the Ireland of that time and the France of two hundred years previously: the same characteristics and the same weakness. Two hundred years ago would have been the period in which France would have prided itself on being the most Catholic country in the world that is immediately preceding the French Revolution. The Revolution did not create all thy hollowness and the hatred of religion which then appeared. It only revealed what was there. It was like taking off a mask.

Spain and Portugal spread the Faith over great tracts of the world's surface but those supreme services to the Church did not mean that the keeping of the Faith was guaranteed to them in perpetuity. They plunged into the most hideous phase of anti-religion which could exist and set themselves to propagate it over the world. It could not be said that the people in those country is put up any fight worth while against that horror. After a little flurry of resistance they abandoned themselves to the irreligion which their governments decreed. Even though the more violent aspects of atheism have worn off, the percentage of belief and practice there is negligible and it cannot be claimed that things are improving.

Does that likeness of conditions discerned by the French observers suggest that we will in due course slide into what they have become? We would be insane if we just shrugged off that possibility.

The Legion of Mary was an antidote to all of this. In many countries across the world, it has been a successful antidote. In Ireland, there is still time for it to be so.

Legionaries across Ireland can still be found today, visiting hospitals, feeding the homeless and handing out miraculous medals on streets.

Duff may have had a profound impact on the rest of the world, but he had a special place in his heart for Ireland, including Joseph Mary Plunkett’s poem I See His Blood Upon the Rose with accompanying artwork at the back of the Legion of Mary handbook.

He saw that the mission of the Legion in Ireland was similar to that of the St. Columbanus and the apostles before them, to go purify within before going out into a chaotic world:

These poured out from their little Isle into that continental wilderness. They invaded nearly every part of it. They rebuilt the lost Faith, built it better than it was before because this time it depended on conviction and not on State scaffolding. They may be said to have made modern Catholicism. That was the Peregrinatio pro Christo.

They would have viewed their mission in a very different way from that in which the Apostles looked on theirs. Much more was known about the world than in the year 33. Christianity moreover had taken root. It might have been laid waste over most of the world but those monks would have seen that as a mere temporary calamity which must be repaired. Certainly ( the Faith was not suffering in Ireland. It was new there and boiling with fervour. The monks were providentially ready for a supreme adventure of that kind.

100 years on from its foundation, the Legion of Mary still has the potential to show the vision and determination that Duff embodied and that has sustained millions of Legionaries, many in secret in China, North Korea and elsewhere.

On this, Our Lady’s birthday and the Legion’s Centenary, we pray:

God our Father,

You inspired your servant Frank Duff with a profound insight into the mystery of your Church, the Body of Christ, and of the place of Mary the Mother of Jesus in this mystery.

In his immense desire to share this insight with others and in filial dependence on Mary he formed her Legion to be a sign of her maternal love for the world and a means of enlisting all her children in the Church’s evangelizing work.

We thank you Father for the graces conferred on him and for the benefits accruing to the Church from his courageous and shining faith.

With confidence we beg you that through his intercession you grant the petition we lay before you.

We ask too that if it be in accordance with your will, the holiness of his life may be acknowledged by the Church for the glory of your Name, through Christ Our Lord, Amen.

Iona Talk (ionainstitute.ie)

Monks of the West by Frank Duff

7th September 2021 begins the centenary year of the Legion of Mary, founded by Frank Duff in Dublin. With millions of members across the world, the organisation is the defining legacy of the Twentieth Century Irish Catholic Church. Oft neglected are some of Duff’s writings, which are perceptive, provoking and rich in wisdom.

I have heard legionaries confess to their feelings of extreme apprehension when a difficult work was about to start. What they had measured up and cheerfully committed themselves to, now took on the aspect of danger and folly. The temptation rises up in them to seek an excuse for backing out. Panic takes possession, which means that one has become irrational, virtually an animal. We must redeem ourselves from that condition.

It is not so difficult; a touch of logic brings the brain into control once again.

A simple reflection is: "What sort of soldier am I? The moment the battle impends I wish to take to flight!"

Secondly, one should always put to oneself this simple question: "What am I afraid of?" Very often that question demolishes the fear. It did in the case of a legionary who was overcome by panic when about to enter Russia. But she asked herself that question and it dispelled the panic. For she realised that the worst that could happen would be that she would be sent home. Thirdly, it is one of our mental kinks that on the eve of a momentous and carefully planned undertaking misgivings rush in and declare it to be lunacy. Chaos rules where all had seemed so clear. The enterprise is in danger.

Dealing with such a situation, Hindenburg, the former German Chancellor, says that we must never change plans at the last minute; that history, the great summary of experience, supplies the watch word: "Hold firm." Fourthly. and here I become more positive, more in line with legionary thinking and with Peregrinatio idealism. Do you want to go off on something with no formidable or disadvantageous aspects? A P.P.C. project offers excitement, congenial company, new and strange experience, a certain glamour.

If it meant no more than that to you, it would be a cheap programme. It is a vital consideration that the attraction of the ancient Peregrinatio lay just in features of an intimidating character. That Peregrinatio was not a pure missionary enterprise. It was a pursuit of souls plus other ingredients. Those indomitable monks did not intend their pursuit of souls to be a mere picnic- to use Edel Ouinn's word. They wished it to be not only an uncompromising response on their part to the command of Our Lord on Mount Olivet but also to His other one that we take up our cross daily and follow Him; and also to His startling injunctions on the subject of heroic faith.

Previously I have discussed with you that wonderful moment of the Ascension.

He Whom they now know to be God delivers that Commission that they ransack the whole world for souls. Then, as they gaze in stupefaction, He raises Himself up and finally a cloud receives Him into itself and they see Him no more. It would be absurd to suppose that they set themselves at once to a deliberate contemplation of that world adventure to which He had bound them. They would be too confused for that. Moreover, between now and the time of that going forth there is to be something else which is so thrilling, so overwhelming as to absorb all their thought. That is the promise of the Paraclete Who is to come and do extraordinary things to them, to fit them for all that lies before them.

That prospect, like a thick veil obscuring everything else, postponed real thinking about the conquest of the world. But the moment that the transforming event of Pentecost took place, they set themselves to their task in the wide world, about which so little was known. That contemplation must have been a most formidable one, even fantastic to persons who had never travelled out beyond their own little country.

It was that same sort of proposition which presented itself to the minds of the Irish monks 500 years later. But of course there were differences. The Christian Faith already had a history. The purely apostolic age was over. The Faith had been announced over much of the known world and had been embraced by multitudes. Many too had laid down their lives for it in 'the persecutions which raged against the infant Church. Moreover, something which was unbelievable, impossible, had taken place. The supreme enemy, Rome the persecutor, had been converted and had become the arch-supporter. All its paraphernalia of power had been thrown into the work of spreading Christianity throughout the Empire. The triumph had been bigger and quicker than anyone could have imagined. The world seemed to be converted, or practically so.

But no. Things were far from being as good as they seemed. The arch-support collapsed, the Roman Empire fell, and it brought down the Church with it. Perhaps in this was intended to lie a Divine warning: that God builds His Church with supernatural bricks. These alone last. The human props serve a temporary purpose, but the builders should see them in that light and should not rely upon them. Build away while the help of the scaffolding is there, but do not lag lest the props be taken away before we are ready.

The Roman Empire had played that role of support for the Church at a period when it was necessary. Let us suppose that God had appointed a term of a century or so for the Church to construct firm fabric. to turn into true Christian cells the half-baked material that flowed in because of the State encouragement? Are we to go on to suppose that the builders were lax? That they relied on the permanence of the Empire; and that they did not impart solidarity to the individual cells?

Whether or not this imagining is precisely justified. there would seem to be a just reasoning in it. It is conformed to the method of God as we see it-around us in lesser manifestations. In any case there would appear to be a drastic lesson in that Empire collapse. It is that Church authorities should take unto themselves the wise thought of Shakespeare. which echoes the Psalm: "Put not your trust in princes nor in the faith of men" (Ps. 145).

Unhappily that same lesson had to be repeated many times afterwards. The Church put its trust in governments and in human policies. and these always failed it in the end. And during those spells of confidence it was content with gerry-building. The only safe construction lies in the filling of the individual parts with true faith. If there are circumstances in play which help the Church. such as a favourable government or other external force. it should not be used as an excuse for relaxing one's own effort. On the contrary that favouring climate should be availed of to work the harder and build the better. We can never afford to relax in regard to souls because they relax in unison with us. But apart from this. it must be borne in mind that the friendly government will change its tune after a while. and so will everyone of those other propitious circumstances. Supports will fall away from under us. and the favour of today may be hostility in the next generation.

However that may be, the fall of the Roman Empire laid waste the world. The state, the style. the noble -edifice of imperial Rome with its far-extended might, its splendid institutions and culture, its order and dignity, its Pax Romana, and its office as educator of the nations-all dissolved into chaos and dust. Never before had the like existed and we must pray that such may never again come on earth. We might almost compare the resulting situation to the Deluge in which everything of the old world perished except what was carried in the Ark.

The picture of the post-Roman Europe could not be exceeded for desolation. The arts and crafts ceased to be practised. Agriculture was neglected, for who would sow when he saw no prospect of reaping. Europe drifted back into its primeval state of forest-land, in clearings of which lived communities. In the main there were two broad categories of survival: To attach oneself to the retinue of some great baron or to remain savagely independent through brigandage.

Pope Pius XI, summing up that scene, declared that Christianity was humanly speaking a lost cause. It was a sort of re-enactment of Good Friday when Christ Himself appeared to be a lost cause.

But the great Pope, goes on to say that God had provided a remedy which would restore Christianity.

It was the monks of the West.

These poured out from their little Isle into that continental wilderness. They invaded nearly every part of it. They rebuilt the lost Faith, built it better than it was before because this time it depended on conviction and not on State scaffolding. They may be said to have made modern Catholicism. That was the Peregrinatio pro Christo.

They would have viewed their mission in a very different way from that in which the Apostles looked on theirs. Much more was known about the world than in the year 33. Christianity moreover had taken root. It might have been laid waste over most of the world but those monks would have seen that as a mere temporary calamity which must be repaired. Certainly ( the Faith was not suffering in Ireland. It was new there and boiling with fervour. The monks were providentially ready for a supreme adventure of that kind.

In one respect the prospect was worse than faced the Apostles. To the latter the world more or less meant Rome. Its hand held or overshadowed the known world and throughout its expanse the Roman civilisation and Roman law and order prevailed. One could travel.

But the Europe of St. Columbanus and his followers was in collapse. Law did not exist. Might was right. Those like the monks who did not carry arms would probably be thrown back for protection on their religious habits. In their missions they would have to penetrate the vast forests in which wild animals lived. So their adventure was as brave as that of the Apostles.

They were taking to themselves in fullness and in literalness the Ascension words of Christ. They were going to do what He had ordered. The dangers or obstacles in the way meant nothing to them. In fact an extraordinary element is observable in their outlook. It was not simply that they saw a star and followed it with a total disregard for the pains and penalties. No, we-see from their Annals that those pains were clearly seen and were eagerly desired. They wanted to carry the Cross of Jesus as well as to preach like Him.

Another distinctive feature in them was what one would have to call a reckless faith. Such was it that some would allege it as a defect. Because we are not supposed to put care and common caution altogether aside. Prudence has its due place; it is not a vice. But those incredible persons had no room in their make-up for any half-measures. They saw their mission as a way of pure faith and they were determined to apply their faith all along and in every circumstance. Such an uncompromising vision naturally tends to disregard any circumspection as a weakness. In fact they seemed to set at defiance what are now proposed as the rules of prudence. But perhaps those modem rules go too far in the other direction and hamper faith. Much of what is being prescribed today would seem to undo faith. In any case the monks' method built up religion whereas the new sceptical method is disintegrating it before our eyes. So much so that humanism and social science are being proposed as substitutes for religion.

St. Brendan and his companions in their earlier voyages did not use sails. They used oars, which of course ministered to another facet of their faith, the desire for penance. The Peregrinatio was specifically seen as an exercise of penance. A very large element of that penance was the perpetual exiling of themselves from their own country.

St. Columbanus, finding his group without an abode where they were about to build a monastery, heard of an immense cave which could accommodate them. But it was in the occupancy of a ferocious bear. The Saint went over to the cave where its owner stood menacingly in the entrance to receive him. Columbanus addressed him as if he were a human being; informed him about their need; suggested that the bear could more easily than they find alternative lodging; and finally requested him to give them possession. Throughout this oration the bear listened as if with understanding. When it was finished, he at once shambled peacefully away.

Nor was there in the method of the monks any special effort to conciliate the great; rather the contrary. The highest were treated as members of the flock and told their duty and defects. They did not like this, for the great are seldom humble. Frequently the monks had to pay the price for their frankness. It secured St. Columbanus's expulsion from France. But therein we must recognise the detailed workings of Providence. because that expulsion sent Columbanus to Switzerland and Italy. In both of those countries he and his companions continued their career of conquest.

It is an intriguing thought that St. Columbanus toyed with the idea of going to Russia instead of to Italy. He did not go to Russia; but if he had, he would have changed the history of the world. Unquestionably he would have made in Russia the same impact as he did everywhere else. This would have meant the beginning of evangelisation there four hundred years before St. Cyril and Methodius opened it up. That gain of four hundred years might have saved Russia from the Great Schism of 1054 and might have been decisive in other ways as well.

Such was the Peregrinatio of the monks of the West. It was so great as a historical episode that the only thing of its kind to which one can compare it is the original apostolic adventure, that is of the Twelve and their successors. It was of the same calibre, covered roughly the same territory, and had the same success. The Peregrinatio was the renewal of the apostolic feat.

As between that Peregrinatio and your own there is an infinite. gulf. But at least the outlines are the same. You make the gift of your holidays and money where they poured out their whole lives. You travel in speed and luxury where they were lucky to live in a bear's den. Fear must have been their atmosphere whereas your main apprehension is a snub at a door. You return to appreciation while none of them ever came back, and half of them were never heard of again.

Nevertheless, the outline of resemblance is, there. In a soft and selfish era your gift is a generous one. Underneath what you do lie great reserves of faith and readiness to give if needed. As such it will be taken hold of as the older Peregrinatio was and used to accomplish eternal purposes.

Every such adventure for souls partakes of the character of the first Pentecost and is linked to it. Tongues of fire are there waiting for such as you who open yourselves to them. You are not only in the company of Mary but are her very devoted children and often made a mockery of for her name's sake. The Paraclete will not deny Himself to you. In the time of preparing to go, you are after a fashion restaging the. time of expectation in the Cenacle, when the Disciples had received the command to go to every creature and the promise that the Holy Spirit would come to them and supply them with all they needed for that seemingly impossible mission. To you too He will come through Mary and lavish on you His abundance; indeed He comes no other way than by her. You will not see the tongues of fire nor hear the sound of a mighty wind, but the giving will be no less real and efficacious. You will go off on your various journeys well armed spiritually for the tasks which await you.

Your special ambition should of course be a difficult assignment, one worthy of the things we have been discussing under the title of Peregrinatio. Feed that ambition by thinking of those inconceivably selfless monks. They deprived themselves of absolutely everything that human nature values: esteem, comfort, home. Their sharpest sacrifice was that they would never again return to Ireland. They shed everything in order to take Christ at His word and to take Christ to every man. Some aspects of that nobility can be imitated by you. In .one way your task will be more difficult than theirs. They had to deal with more violent but simpler characters than will confront you.

You will probably not encounter physical danger. Your problem will be the blank wall of unbelief and sophistication which has all the look of being impenetrable. The Apostles and the monks of the Peregrinatio had not that to face; their world was readier to believe. So your particular contribution must be intensity of Faith. We are told on the highest authority that Mary has given you a special Faith. Use it like a battering ram against that blank wall, and you may find that it totters under your blow. It is not as solid or as sure of itself as it pretends to be. Some of it is composed of our own emigrants or their descendants and their affectation of ir religion is not completely genuine. Most of the others would be the descendants of the Reformation in whom survives in varying degrees the Catholic tradition. Catholicism dies hard. Like the faint glow under the ashes, it can be fanned to life again.

Faith is a Divine, almost handleable quality. It can be used like money to buy things. But unlike money it can increase in ourselves according as we bestow it on others. It is supposed to be communicated from one to another. Faith is passed on by giving and hearing. It is not a remote, impersonal element which can be imparted through the communications media. Religious history is full of examples where unbelieving persons suddenly got Faith from others who willed to give it to them.

You are privileged to see signs of this operation in connection with your use of the Miraculous Medal. The fact that this medal works is uncontestable. There is not one among us who has not had startling evidence of its power to soften and to produce effects. The only valid explanation of its efficacy is that it is faith reduced after a fashion to visible form, which is precisely what a Sacramental amounts to. It applies our faith to a particular purpose in a tangible way. Again I use the analogy of money which conveniences us in purchasing. We are looking for something in the higher or spiritual order; we assign the medal, So to speak, to that purchase. Our faith puts itself forth through the medal and our desire is granted to us. The medal almost enables us to handle grace, and I repeat that this is the idea of the Sacramentals. Present the medal to a person and you have brought your faith into very close touch with him.

Some of you have heard the story of the Indian girl drowned in the Cowichan River. The body had been sought unavailingly for a week by the whole tribe. It came at once to the surface at the spot where a Miraculous Medal was thrown in at the moment of the abandonment of the search. One day I told this story to a legionary group. An hour afterwards a watch was lost in a mountain-side wilderness where ten thousand men would not have availed to find it. Remembering the story, a medal was thrown into the midst of the tangle of vegetation. It fell on the watch. The medal could bring up a body, it could find a watch. More important, it can awaken life in a dead soul. But it is only a channel of Faith, so never just give the medal mechanically. Deliberately intend it to be a carrier of your Faith and the confiding of that soul to its Mother Mary whose image is on the medal. Your Faith is the treasure which you carry. Though it is yours, it is not altogether a personal possession.

It is God in you.

He wants to widen His place in you and at the same time to issue through you to others. Indeed these two things are bound up with each other. If we do not try to share our Faith, it may dry up in us. If we do try to put it to a full use, it can become a vaster force than anything in nature, immeasurably greater than the atom bomb, more far-reaching than space travel.

Let us set that force at work on the most neglected cause of the day, conversion. Because conversion is the central idea of the Church and yet so neglected, effort directed towards it will draw omnipotence from on high. Listen, Our Lord Himself is speaking: "Have Faith in God. Amen, I say to you, whoever says to this mountain: arise and cast yourself into the sea, and does not waver in his heart but believes that whatever he \ says will be done, that shall be done for him" (Mark 11, 23). And Our Lord adds: "And nothing will be impossible to you" (Matt. 17, 19).

Let us take Him at His word.

Thousands Attend March For Life UK

The abortion rate in the United Kingdom increased once again this past year, to 18.2 per 1,000 women.

With this in mind, and the recent attacks on Northern Ireland’s unborn under ‘Catholic’ Boris Johnson’s watch, this year’s March for Life UK has had an added urgency.

The numbers who attended Saturday’s event numbered in the thousands, as they marched through the streets of London. This year’s events also saw an earlier online prolife conference called ‘Lifestream’ which was designed to build momentum for the in person march.

One of the speakers at the event was a Catholic, Bishop Paul Swarbrick of Lancaster Diocese.

He asked:

We've abolished the death penalty for the guilty, why do we still have it for the innocent?

You can watch his talk at the link below.

There was also a poignant moment where the attendees knelt in prayer to ask God to help them end the slaughter of the British and Irish unborn.

E-hBjDkXIAAV94Y.jpg

Here is a summary of the UK abortion stats that were recently released:

The age standardised abortion rate for residents is 18.2 per 1,000 women, the highest rate since the Abortion Act was introduced.

  • The abortion rate has increased for women over 35 (from 9.7 to 10.6 per 1,000 between 2019 and 2020).

  • The abortion rate in 2020 was highest for women aged 21 (at 30.6 per 1,000 women)

  • 81% of abortions in 2020 were for women whose marital status was given as single

  • 51% were to women whose marital status was given as single with a partner

  • 77% of women having abortions reported their ethnicity as White, 9% as Asian, 7% as Black, 4% as Mixed and 2% as Other.

  • 98.1% of abortions (205,930) were performed under ground C (That the pregnancy has NOT exceeded its 24th week and that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman) i.e. because they chose to get one and the doctor ticked the box, which makes a mockery of that phrase ‘trust doctors’

  • 1.5% were carried out under ground E (That there is substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped)

  • There were 229 (7%) ground E abortions at 24 weeks and over

  • In 2020, 42% of women undergoing abortions had had one or more previous abortions. The proportion has increased steadily from 34% in 2010

  • Complications were reported in 247 out of 209,917 cases in 2020, a rate of 1 in every 850 abortions (1.2 per 1,000 abortions)

  • Women living in the most deprived areas are more than twice as likely to have abortions than women living in the least deprived areas. The rate in the most deprived decile is 26.8 per 1,000 women, compared to 12.1 per 1,000 women for women living in the least deprived areas. (Figure 14).

  • 1,301 girls under 19 were getting at least their second abortion

  • 20% of all foreign abortions were to women from the Irish Republic. 12% of these were repeat users of abortion.

  • Almost 5% came from Poland and Malta

The UK is now facing a new fight on the life front, with politicians mulling over the legalisation of Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide.

So far, the prolife movement there has generally not been able to replicate the successes of their American counterparts, who have scored major victories in Texas and other states in recent months. Texas and other prolife states like Alabama have one thing that makes it different from most of the UK, religiosity. As a result, the UK is probably one of the most difficult breeding grounds for a successful prolife movement but let us pray for their success nonetheless and work to support them as their level of abortions, 200,000 a year, is catastrophic and the coming battle over Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide could be too.

Priests Offer Mass atop Skellig Michael

The monastic site of Skellig Michael lies off of the coast of County Kerry, in the Atlantic Ocean. The remote island was once home to monks, who lived a life of necessary self sufficiency, solitude and prayer.

Designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1996 and recently made even more famous through the Irish government’s decision to allow Disney to film Star Wars there, the site has been in use since the foundation of a monastery by Augustinians in the early medieval period.

The unique location, its evocative representation of the purity of Celtic Catholicism and its proximity to the picturesque Atlantic views of Kerry have all contributed to Skellig Michael becoming the most precious of all of the treasures of the Irish faith.

This past week, a number of priests travelled by boat to Skellig Michael for Mass atop its peak and to say a prayer of consecration of Ireland to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, the Immaculate Heart of Mary and the Pure and Chaste Heart of St. Joseph.

The occasion drew on the wide variety within the Irish church with priests were from a wide variety of orders and backgrounds, including Servant Home of the Mother, Franciscan Friars of the Renewal, Institute of Incarnate Word, Capuchins, Order of St. Camillus, Salesians, Franciscans, Dominicans and Kerry and Cork and Ross Dioceses.

The consecration prayer read ‘We ask the Holy Family of Nazareth to guide, protect and defend all families in our country and protect all married couples from the attack of secularism’ while also seeking a ‘spiritual renewal.

Ireland is a canvas which has had its colours brought to light with the oils of our Christian heritage, may we never forget that.

You can watch an incredible video of the Mass and consecration below.

Florida Could Pass Texas Style Pro Baby Bill

The fallout from the stunning prolife victory in Texas this week is already having incredible repercussions, with a number of other states promising to follow suit.

The most prominent amongst those is Florida, the third most populous state in the United States of America, with Texas the second. If successful, prolife lawmakers would provide protection for the unborn in a combined population of 50 million, with many more states waiting in the wings.

Governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis has said that ‘What they did in Texas was interesting and I haven’t really been able to look enough into it, I am going to look more significantly at it.”

Meanwhile, Senate President Wilton Simpson stated that Florida Republicans were already working on such an amendment. He stated:

Abortion kills children and forever changes the life of the mother, the father, and the entire extended family.

As an adoptive child myself, it’s important to me that we do everything we can to promote adoption and prevent abortion; therefore, I think it’s worthwhile to take a look at the Texas law and see if there is more we can do here in Florida.

House Speaker Chris Sprowls added:

In Florida, we agree that killing an innocent human being with a beating heart is wrong. It is why we have worked every session to strengthen protections for unborn babies, including those for unborn children with disabilities last session, and it is why I am confident that those who share this moral view in the Florida House will continue the fight .

The pro abortion community in the United States are livid over these restrictions, but they must also know that they are completely powerless, as Ireland’s prolifers were in 2018 while the issue went the other way.

Meanwhile, President Joe Biden’s press secretary Jen Psaki was heavily criticised yesterday when she appeared to breakout in a semi voluntary condescending contortion at the mention of Catholicism in relation to abortion.

Today, President Joe Biden referred to the Texas Law as ‘pernicious' and ‘un American’. He said ‘I respect those who believe that life begins at conception…I don’t believe it but I respect it’.

Without the Supreme Court to count on, it is extremely unlikely that the lucrative abortion industry will have any ability to turn this situation around. The concern of course is that those who have made vast amounts of money from these companies will now spread their poison around the world with increased velocity after losing such an important customer base.

Bodies of Korean Martyrs Recovered After 230 Years

The history of Christianity in Korea is like the history of Christianity in most other countries, full of persecution and those willing to lay down their lives as Our Lord did.

Arriving in the late 18th Century, the Catholic faith had some 10,000 martyrs over the course of the 19th century across Korea, most of them incredible violent.

The Confucian authorities had begun to seize Catholic paraphernalia as early as the 1780s, as a precursor to extensive persecutions.

Yun Ji Chung Paul was from a noble family in Korea, but he quickly became enamoured with the Catholic faith, which was growing in popularity through translations of spiritual books printed from Chinese. After his cousin had taught him about the faith, Paul was baptised in 1787. He quickly began to run afoul of the traditional religion of Korea, by converting his mother who received a Catholic funeral.

He was eventually put on trial alongside his cousin James Kwon Sang-yeon, both of whom were sentence to death. They were beheaded for refusing to perform ancestral rites, leading to the Bishop of Beijing sending a priest to perform the first Mass in the Kingdom of Joseon where the killings had taken place.

When he was being brought to be martyred, records show that he was ‘smiling as if he was on his way to a party’.

His last words were ‘Jesus, Maria’.

Now, DNA testing has matched up three bodies with those of Paul and his brother (who was martyred afterwards) and James.

The Diocese of Jeonju has said, ‘We have found the remains of those who first set the history of martyrdom for our church, which was founded on the blood of the martyrs’.

Despite being a relatively small proportion of the population, around 11%, Korean Catholics have achieved immense successes in recent, years, producing cardinals and missionaries. There have also been two Catholic presidents.

Texas Abortion Merchants Rush Deaths of Unborns

With news that abortion would be effectively illegal in Texas from midnight, those who have made money from destroying unborn children have panicked and tried to hurry through as many controlled destructions as possible.

One such abortion activist is Marva Sadler, who claims that she was raised Christian and that these beliefs (mixed with Rastafarianism) now compel her to carry out these acts of violence against the unborn. She has said:

Whether it’s the Christian tradition I grew up with or the Rastafarian beliefs I practice now, at the core of my work as an abortion provider is the unwavering love and humanity I feel for my patients, my colleagues and my community

The company that she works for, Whole Woman’s Health, states that it ‘believes that everyone must be at the center of their own healthcare decisions. We are committed to destigmatizing abortion and creating safe spaces for all people’. Their homepage shows women shopping and laughing, though it is not clear if this is being portrayed as having occurred before or after an abortion.

In a statement released on their site, Amy Hagstrom Miller (the group’s President) stated:

This morning I woke up with a feeling of deep sadness. I’m worried. I’m numb. I’d like to take a moment to share with you all what the final hours of legal abortion care looked like in Texas last night. Whole Woman’s Health had staff and physicians providing abortions in Texas until 11:56pm CST. That was the time we finished our last abortion in Fort Worth. All day, our waiting rooms were filled with patients and their loved ones in all four of our Texas clinics. They were desperate to get an abortion before this law went into effect.

Last night we had a physician who has worked with us for decades in tears as he tried to complete the abortions for all the folks that were waiting in our Fort Worth waiting room. Marva Sadler, who is a plaintiff in this case and serves as our Director of Clinical Services, was on site working with this physician to see every single patient before last night’s deadline. She called me at 10:00pm CST with 27 patients left in the waiting room. Both she and the physician were crying asking “What can we do? How can we be sure that we can see all these folks?” Keep in mind that the anti-abortion protesters were outside from the moment we opened at 7:30am until we closed at midnight. Once it got dark [outside] they brough giant lights and shined them on the parking lot. We were under surveillance.

In an interview with 19thnews.org, Sadler unconvincingly stated ‘we are not the bad guys here’. 19thnews reported that 67 babies in total were destroyed during the last day of legal abortion in the chamber.

It is always interesting to analyse the language in such articles, the writer of that interview refers to ‘adrenaline’ rushing through the veins of those putting babies to death. The author also makes a peculiar reference of people being in ‘limbo’.

It also says that Sadler, the Christian turned Rastafarian, told the abortion doctor that the intentional killing of one child would have been a ‘victory’. In a deranged tweet today, they wrote:

Abortion is a good thing and it makes people’s lives better’.

The decision in Texas could begin a domino effect that may take years to impact the rest of the world, but nonetheless could herald a more humane and kind wave of treatment towards the unborn.

62 million Americans may have perished in the womb since Roe Vs. Wade, no less tragic than those drowning at Normandy in 1944 or falling from towers in 2001, but it is looking increasing unlikely that 62 million will die in the same way in the coming 50 years.

Texas is Now Essentially Abortion Free

In a stunning victory for the right to life, Texas has become the first state in the United States of America to effectively ban abortion.

Under the law, anyone who aids the abortion of another in direct or indirect fashion is culpable for the death of the baby aborted.

The time limit on the law is at 6 weeks pregnancy, which is effectively a total ban on abortion. Those who assist in the controlled destruction of an unborn child at an abortion facility will be liable for €10,000 to any citizen who says that they have been affected in any way by the occurrence of said child being destroyed.

US President Joe Biden, who ordered a drone strike that blew up 7 innocent Afghan children this week, referred to it as ‘outrageous’.

The bill will take effect from September. It is likely that there will be challenges to the law, but the pro abortion lobby in the USA are currently embroiled in debates about whether or not women exist and men can get pregnant, so it is unlikely that they will be able to mount an effective enough response.

As in the UK, abortion has still continued in large numbers over the course of the past decade in the USA, though prolife campaigners have won several large victories against the barbaric stone age practice, mostly in states where they have engaged heavily in politics.

Fresh from championing President Biden’s efforts in Afghanistan, which included destroying 7 innocent children this week, the American media have employed the usual trope of trying to see today’s events through the lens of Hollywood films that they may have consumed.

Today is a great day for Texas, the United States of America and for humanity.